Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 22, § 64653 - Filtration
(a) All approved
surface water utilized by a supplier shall be treated using one of the
following filtration technologies unless an alternative process has been
approved by the State Board pursuant to subsections (e), (f), (g), and (h):
(1) Conventional filtration
treatment;
(2) Direct filtration
treatment;
(3) Diatomaceous earth
filtration; or
(4) Slow sand
filtration.
(b)
Conventional filtration treatment shall be deemed to be capable of achieving at
least 99.7 percent removal of Giardia lamblia cysts, 99
percent removal of viruses, and 99 percent removal of
Cryptosporidium when in compliance with operating criteria
specified in section
64660 and performance standards
specified in table 64653. Direct filtration treatment, diatomaceous earth
filtration, and slow sand filtration shall be deemed to be capable of achieving
at least 99 percent removal of Giardia
lamblia cysts, 90 percent removal of viruses, and 99 percent
removal of Cryptosporidium when in compliance with operating
criteria specified in section
64660 and performance standards
specified in table 64653.
(c) A
supplier shall comply with the combined filter effluent turbidity performance
standards in table 64653 for each treatment plant while the plant is in
operation:
Table 64653
Combined Filter Effluent Turbidity Performance Standards(a)
| If a supplier uses... | The turbidity level of the combined filter effluent... |
| (1) Conventional or direct filtration treatment and serves 10,000 or more persons | (A) Shall be less than or equal to 0.3 NTU in at least 95 percent of the measurements taken each month; |
| (B) Shall not exceed 1 NTU for more than one continuous hour; | |
| (C) Shall not exceed 1 NTU at four-hour intervals; and | |
| (D) Shall not exceed 1.0 NTU for more than eight consecutive hours. | |
| (2) Conventional or direct filtration treatment and serves fewer than 10,000 persons | (A) Shall be less than or equal to 0.3 NTU in at least 95 percent of the measurements taken each month; |
| (B) For a supplier using a grab sample monitoring program: | |
| 1. Shall not exceed 1 NTU; and | |
| 2. Shall not exceed 1.0 NTU in more than two consecutive samples; and | |
| (C) For a supplier using a continuous monitoring program: | |
| 1. If recording results at least once every 15 minutes, shall comply with paragraph (1)(B); and | |
| 2. Shall comply with paragraphs (1)(C) and (1)(D). | |
| (3) Diatomaceous earth filtration | (A) Shall be less than or equal to 0.5 NTU in at least 95 percent of the measurements taken each month; |
| (B) Shall not exceed 5.0 NTU; | |
| (C) For a supplier using a grab sample monitoring program, shall comply with paragraph (2)(B)2; and | |
| (D) For a supplier using a continuous monitoring program, shall comply with paragraph (1)(D). | |
| (4) Slow sand filtration | (A) Shall be less than or equal to 1.0 NTU in at least 95 percent of the measurements taken each month; and |
| (B) Shall not exceed 5.0 NTU. | |
| __________________________________________________ | |
| (a) If there is only one filter at the treatment plant, the combined filter effluent turbidity performance standards shall apply to the effluent produced by the filter. | |
(d)
To obtain approval for a higher removal efficiency than that specified in
subsection (b), a water supplier shall demonstrate to the State Board that the
higher removal efficiency can be reliably obtained.
(e) An alternative to the filtration
technologies specified in subsection (a) may be used provided that the supplier
demonstrates to the State Board that the alternative technology:
(1) Provides a minimum of 99 percent Giardia
lamblia cyst removal, 90 percent virus removal for the supplier serving more
than 500 persons, and 99 percent Cryptosporidium removal;
and
(2) Meets the turbidity
performance standards established by the State Board, as determined from the
alternative filtration technology demonstration conducted pursuant to
subsection (f). The turbidity performance standards shall not be less stringent
than the turbidity performance standards established in subsection
(c)(1).
(f) The
alternative filtration technology demonstration shall be based on the results
from a prior equivalency demonstration or a testing of a full scale
installation that is treating a water with similar characteristics and is
exposed to similar hazards as the water proposed for treatment. A pilot plant
test of the water to be treated may also be used for this demonstration if
conducted with the approval of the State Board. The demonstration shall be
presented in an engineering report prepared by a qualified engineer.
(g) A supplier proposing to use an
alternative filtration technology may request from the State Board a waiver to
comply with the requirements of subsection (e) to demonstrate 90 percent virus
removal. The request shall be based on a watershed sanitary survey conducted in
accordance with section
64665, within 12 months of the
date of the request, that demonstrates a lack of virus hazard in the
watershed.
(h) The State Board's
approval of alternative filtration technologies, including establishment of
performance standards and monitoring requirements, shall be done in accordance
with the permit process specified in sections
116525
through
116550
of the Health and Safety Code.
(i)
Within 60 days following the first full year of operation of a new alternative
filtration treatment process approved by the State Board, the supplier shall
submit an engineering report prepared by a qualified engineer describing the
effectiveness of the plant operation. The report shall include results of all
water quality tests performed and shall evaluate compliance with established
performance standards under actual operating conditions. It shall also include
an assessment of problems experienced, corrective actions needed, and a
schedule for providing needed improvements.
Notes
2. Amendment of subsections (a), (b), (d)(1) and (e)-(h) and amendment of NOTE filed 6-8-98; operative 7-8-98 (Register 98, No. 24).
3. Amendment of subsection (b), new subsection (c)(3) and amendment of subsection (f) and NOTE filed 12-13-2007; operative 1-12-2008 (Register 2007, No. 50).
4. Amendment of section and NOTE filed 5-22-2013; operative 7-1-2013 (Register 2013, No. 21).
5. Change without regulatory effect amending section and NOTE filed 6-2-2015 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2015, No. 23).
6. Amendment of Table 64563 filed 5-28-2021; operative 7-1-2021 (Register 2021, No. 22).
Note: Authority cited: Sections 116271, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 116350, 116365, 116375, 116385, 116525, 116530, 116540, 116550 and 116735, Health and Safety Code.
2. Amendment of subsections (a), (b), (d)(1) and (e)-(h) and amendment of Note filed 6-8-98; operative 7-8-98 (Register 98, No. 24).
3. Amendment of subsection (b), new subsection (c)(3) and amendment of subsection (f) and Note filed 12-13-2007; operative 1-12-2008 (Register 2007, No. 50).
4. Amendment of section and Note filed 5-22-2013; operative 7-1-2013 (Register 2013, No. 21).
5. Change without regulatory effect amending section and Note filed 6-2-2015 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2015, No. 23).
6. Amendment of Table 64563 filed 5-28-2021; operative
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.