10 CCR 2506-1-4.802 - APPEAL PROCESS

Any household that is aggrieved by any action of the local office affecting the household's participation in SNAP may appeal by requesting a local-level dispute resolution conference (DRC) and/or a state-level fair hearing.

The right of a household to a DRC and state-level hearing is primarily to ensure that a proposed eligibility determination or action is valid, to protect the person against an erroneous action concerning benefits, and to ensure reasonable promptness of local office action. The individual may choose to request a DRC or bypass the DRC and appeal directly to the Colorado Department of Human Services (CDHS) for a state-level fair hearing.

CDHS may deny fair hearings to those households that are disputing a mass change, or the fact that a statewide reduction, cancellation, or suspension was ordered. In such instances, CDHS is not required to hold a fair hearing unless the request is based on the household's belief that the rules were misapplied.

If the household has a combined appeal, the appeal will be bifurcated. The SNAP fair hearings unit will process and hear the SNAP appeal, and the Office of Administrative Courts (OAC) will process and hear the other benefits program appeal(s). The SNAP fair hearings unit will provide the parties with any necessary instructions and/or procedures related to combined appeals.

4.802.1 Time Period for Requesting an Appeal
A. A household shall be allowed to request a DRC or state-level fair hearing on the following:
1. Any action by the local office that occurred in the previous ninety (90) calendar days.
2. A loss of benefits that occurred in the previous ninety (90) calendar days. Such SNAP action shall include a denial of a request for restoration of benefits lost more than ninety (90) calendar days, but less than a year prior to the request.
3. At any time during a certification period a household may request a fair hearing to dispute its current level of benefits.
B. An aggrieved household shall be advised that the use of a DRC is optional, and it shall in no way delay or replace the state-level fair hearing process. If the household does not want a DRC but desires to have the disputed matter considered only at a state-level hearing, this fact should be indicated in the case record. In these cases, the request for an appeal shall be forwarded to the SNAP fair hearings unit.
4.802.2 Continuation of Benefits Pending Final Agency Decision
A. Eligibility for Continuation of Benefits
1. If a household requests a state-level fair hearing or local-level dispute resolution conference any time prior to the effective date of the Notice of Adverse Action and its certification period has not expired, the household's participation in the program shall be continued on the basis authorized immediately prior to the Notice of Adverse Action unless the household specifically waives continuation of benefits.

Households which were not given a ten (10) day advance notice period plus one (1) additional calendar day for mailing time, or five (5) additional calendar days for mailing for households participating in the address confidentiality program (ACP), prior to the effective date of the Notice of Adverse Action shall be given ten (10) calendar days after the date the notice is mailed to appeal and receive continued benefits unless the household specifically waives continuation of benefits.

2. If a request for an appeal is not made within the times specified above, benefits shall be reduced or terminated as provided in the Notice of Adverse Action. However, if the household established that its failure to make the request within the established timeframe was for circumstances beyond the individual's control, the local office shall reinstate the household's benefits on the basis authorized immediately prior to the Notice of Adverse Action, unless the household indicates it has waived continuation of benefits. Such circumstances are: illness, illness of another household member requiring the presence of the member, a household emergency, the unavailability of transportation, or other circumstances that would preclude the individual from taking the required action.
3. When benefits are reduced or terminated because of a mass change, participation on the prior basis shall be reinstated only if the issue being contested is that SNAP eligibility or benefits were improperly computed or that federal regulations or state rules were misapplied or misinterpreted by the local office.
4. Households appealing a decision based on information reported as part of the recertification process are not eligible for continued benefits. The benefit allotment that a household is certified to receive shall not be issued beyond the end of the household's assigned certification period without a new determination of eligibility. The household's benefit allotment beginning with the new certification period shall be based on the new review of eligibility.
B. Household's Requirement to Request a Continuation of Benefits

If the letter or form requesting an appeal does not positively indicate that the household has waived continuation of benefits, the local office shall assume that continuation of benefits is desired, and the benefits shall be issued accordingly.

C. Establishing a Claim on Benefits That Were Continued

If the local office action is upheld by the hearing decision, a claim shall be established against the household for all over-issuances. This includes over-issuances due to the household receiving a continuation of benefits that the household was determined not eligible to receive. Such claims shall be classified as an inadvertent household error claim.

D. The certification office shall promptly inform the household in writing if the benefits are reduced or terminated pending the final agency decision. Once benefits are continued or reinstated, benefits shall not be reduced or terminated prior to the receipt of the final agency decision unless:
1. The certification period expires. The household may reapply and may be determined eligible for a new certification period with a benefit amount as determined by the local office.
2. The administrative adjudicator makes a preliminary determination, in writing and at the hearing, that the sole issue is one of federal law or regulation and that the household's claim that the local office improperly computed the benefits or misinterpreted or misapplied such law or regulation is invalid.
3. A change affecting the household's eligibility or basis of issuance occurs while the final agency decision is pending, and the household fails to request a hearing after the subsequent Notice of Adverse Action.
4. A mass change affecting the household's eligibility or basis of issuance occurs while the final agency decision is pending. During the fair hearing period, the local office shall adjust allotments to consider reported changes, information considered verified upon receipt, and mass changes, but not the factors on which the fair hearing is based.
4.802.21 Households Disputing Restoration of Lost Benefits
A. The household has the right to appeal through the fair hearing process if the household disagrees with any action taken to grant or restore lost benefits.
B. If the local office has determined that a household is entitled to restoration of lost benefits but the household is appealing some action in calculating or restoring the lost benefits, the household shall receive the lost benefits as determined by the local office, pending the hearing results. Once a final agency decision is reached, the local office shall comply with that decision.
C. To be eligible for restored benefits, the household shall have had its SNAP benefits wrongfully delayed, denied, or terminated. The term denial shall include the situation where, through certification office error, the net income was larger than required under proper determination, and because of this improperly set net income, the household was unable to get the full allotment for which it was eligible. Delay shall mean that eligibility determination was not accomplished within the prescribed time limits set forth in Section 4.205.2.
4.802.3 Rights During an Appeal
A. A household is entitled to the following:
1. Be represented by an authorized representative, such as legal counsel, relative, friend, or other spokesman, or they may represent themselves at the DRC or state-level fair hearing.
2. Adequate opportunity to examine the case file and all documents and records used by the local office in making its decision and all documents and records that are to be used at the hearing at a reasonable time before the date of the hearing as well as during the hearing.

The contents of the case file including the application form and documents of verification used by the local office to establish the household's eligibility and allotment shall be made available, provided that confidential information, such as the names of individuals who have disclosed information about the household without its knowledge; or the nature or status of pending criminal prosecutions; or confidential informants; or privileged communications between the local office and its attorney is protected from disclosure.

If requested by the household or its representative, the local office shall provide a free copy of the portions of the case file that are relevant to the hearing. Confidential information that is protected from release and other documents or records which the household will not otherwise have an opportunity to contest, or challenge shall not be introduced at the hearing nor affect the hearing officer's decision.

3. Present new information or documentation to support reversal or modification of the proposed adverse action.
B. The household, its representative, and the local office shall be entitled to:
1. Present the case or have it presented by a legal counsel or other person.
2. Bring witnesses.
3. Advance arguments without undue interference.
4. Question or refute any testimony or evidence, including an opportunity to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses.
5. Submit evidence to establish all pertinent facts and circumstances in the case.
4.802.4 Local Office Responsibility During an Appeal
A. Upon request, the local office shall make available without charge the specific materials necessary for a household or its representative to determine whether a hearing should be requested or to prepare for a hearing. If the individual making the request communicates in a language other than English, the local office is required to provide bilingual staff or an interpreter who can effectively translate between the client's language and English. The local office shall ensure that the hearing procedures are verbally explained in that language, upon request. The local office shall also help a household with its hearing process. Households shall be advised of any legal services available that can provide representation at the hearing.
B. The local office shall expedite hearing requests from households, such as migrant farm workers, that plan to move from the jurisdiction of the hearing officer before the hearing decision would normally be reached. Hearing requests from these households shall be processed faster than others, if necessary, to enable them to receive a decision before they leave the area.
C. The local office shall have the burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence, to establish the basis of the issue being appealed whether the appeal is at a state-level fair hearing or at a local-level DRC. This burden of proof applies to all matters other than IPV, which is outlined in sections 4.803.2, C and 4.803.2, E.
4.802.5 Local-Level Dispute Resolution Conferences (DRC)
A. Before taking action to deny, terminate, reduce, or recover SNAP benefits, the local office shall provide the household an opportunity for a DRC. The individual may choose to bypass the DRC process and appeal directly to the SNAP fair hearings unit for a state-level fair hearing.
B. If the household requests a DRC, the local office shall arrange one to attempt to resolve the disputed action. The household may be represented by legal counsel or have other persons present to aid the household in the DRC.
C. Failure of the client to request a DRC within the prior notice period or failure to appear at the time of the scheduled DRC without making a timely request for postponement shall constitute abandonment of the right to a DRC, unless the client can show good cause for their failure to appear. "Good cause" includes, but is not limited to:
1. Death or incapacity of a client, or a member of his or her immediate family, or the representative;
2. Any other health or medical condition of an emergency nature; or
3. Other circumstances beyond the control of the client, and which would prevent a reasonable person from making a timely request for a DRC or postponement of a scheduled DRC.
D. The local office may consolidate the SNAP DRC with disputes regarding other assistance payments programs, the Colorado Works (CW) Program, or disputes concerning Medicaid eligibility if the facts are similar and consolidation will facilitate the resolution of all disputes.
4.802.51 Management of Local-Level Dispute Resolution Conference (DRC)
A. General Requirements

The DRC shall be conducted on an informal basis. Every effort shall be made to ensure that the household understands the local office's specific reasons for the proposed action and the applicable State Department's rules. The local office shall have available at the DRC all pertinent documents and records in the case file relevant to the specific action in dispute.

B. Scheduling
1. To the extent possible, the DRC shall be scheduled and conducted within the prior notice period. If the local office cannot conduct the DRC within this period, for whatever reason, the adverse action in dispute shall be delayed until a DRC can be held, unless the household waives continuation of benefits.
2. If a DRC is requested to attempt to resolve a contested denial of expedited service, it shall be scheduled within two (2) working days of the receipt of the request for a DRC unless the household requests that it be held later. Prior notice is not required.
3. The local office shall provide reasonable notice to the household of the scheduled time and location for the DRC, or the time of the scheduled telephone conference. Notice shall be in writing; however, verbal notice may be given to facilitate the DRC process.
C. Location

The DRC shall be held in the local office where the proposed decision is pending and before a person who was not directly involved in the initial determination of the action in question. The DRC may be conducted either in person or by telephone. If a telephonic conference is requested, it shall be agreed upon by the client. In the event the household does not speak English or is visually or hearing impaired, an interpreter or translator shall be provided by the local office.

D. County Representatives

The individual who initiated the action in dispute shall not conduct the DRC. The individual who initiated the action in dispute shall attend the DRC and present the factual basis for the disputed action. The person designated to conduct the DRC shall be in a position which, based on knowledge, experience, and training, would enable them to determine if the proposed action is valid.

E. Joint Dispute Resolution Processes

Two (2) or more local offices may establish a joint DRC process. If two or more counties establish a joint process, the location of the DRC need not be held in the county or agency taking the action, but the DRC location shall be convenient to the client.

F. Notice of DRC Decision
1. If the additional information presented in the DRC proves that the adverse action is not warranted, the case record shall be documented, and the Notice of Adverse Action cancelled.
2. At the conclusion of the DRC, the person presiding shall reduce to writing the agreement entered by the parties. Such agreement shall be signed by the parties and/or their representatives and shall be binding upon the parties. A copy of the written decision shall immediately be provided to the client and/or his or her representative. The local office shall also forward a copy of the decision to the State Department, within five (5) working days of the hearing, regardless of whether the client agrees with the outcome.
3. In the event the dispute is not resolved, the person presiding shall prepare a written statement indicating that the dispute was not resolved. The decision shall include:
a. A statement explaining the client's right to request a state-level fair hearing;
b. The time limit for requesting a state-level hearing; and,
c. If appropriate, a statement that the household's previous benefit amount will continue pending a final state decision in accordance with Section 4.802.2, if appealed to the state within the appeal timeframe provided on the original Notice of Action cooresponding to the disputed action.
4.802.6 STATE-LEVEL FAIR HEARINGS
4.802.61 MANAGEMENT OF STATE-LEVEL HEARINGS
A. Scheduling
1. The SNAP fair hearings unit at the Colorado Department of Human Services (CDHS) or the Office of Administrative Courts (OAC), if so designated by CDHS, shall arrange the time, date, and place of the state-level fair hearing so that the hearing is accessible to the household. At least ten (10) calendar days prior to the hearing, advance written notice shall be provided to all parties involved to permit adequate preparation of the case. The household, however, may request less advanced notice to expedite the scheduling of the hearing. The notice shall:
a. Advise the household or its representative of the name, address, and phone number of the person to notify in the event it is not possible for the household to attend the scheduled hearing.
b. Specify that the household's hearing request will be dismissed if the household or its representative fails to appear for the hearing without good cause.
c. Include a copy of the information outlining CDHS' state-level fair hearing procedures.
d. Explain that the household may examine the case file prior to the hearing.
2. Hearing requests for households that plan to move from the area, such as migrant farm workers, shall be processed faster than others, if necessary, to enable them to receive a decision and any appropriate restoration of benefits before they leave the area.
3. The administrative adjudicator shall complete the hearing no more than twenty-five (25) calendar days from when the SNAP fair hearings unit received the notice of appeal. The household may request and is entitled to receive a postponement (also referred to as a continuance) of the scheduled hearing. The postponement shall not exceed 30 days and the time limit for action on the final agency decision may be extended for as many days as the hearing is postponed. A county may not request and is not entitled to receive a postponement.
4. The administrative adjudicator may respond to a series of individual requests for hearings by conducting a single group hearing related to SNAP appeals. The snap fair hearings unit may consolidate only SNAP related cases where individual issues of fact are not disputed and where related issues of state and/or federal law, regulation, or policy are the sole issues being raised. In all group hearings, the regulations governing individual hearings shall be followed. Each individual household shall be permitted to present its own case or have its case presented by a representative.
B. Hearings Conducted by Phone

The hearing may be conducted by telephone using conference call techniques or by video conference unless one of the parties objects to either of these methods. If a hearing is held by telephone using conference call techniques or by video conference, the rules of procedure (including a recording of the hearing) shall be the same as a face-to-face hearing.

C. Attendance

The hearing shall be attended by a representative of the local office and by the household and/or its representative. The hearing may also be attended by friends or relatives of the household if the household so chooses. The administrative adjudicator shall have the authority to limit the number of persons in attendance at the hearing if space limitations exist.

D. Administrative Adjudicator

The administrative adjudicator shall:

1. Administer all oaths or affirmations as required by the State;
2. Ensure all relevant issues are considered;
3. Request, receive, and make part of the record all evidence determined necessary to decide the issues being raised;
4. Regulate the conduct and course of the hearing consistent with due process to ensure an orderly hearing;
5. Order, where relevant and useful, an independent medical assessment or professional evaluation from a source mutually satisfactory to the household and the local office;
6. Provide a hearing record and prepare and file an initial hearing decision with the Office of Appeals (OOA) which shall serve each party with a copy of the initial decision.
4.802.62 Hearing Denials or Dismissals
A. CDHS shall not deny or dismiss a request for a hearing unless:
1. The request is not received within the time period specified in Section 4.802.1.
2. The request is withdrawn in writing by the household or its representative; or,
3. The household or its representative fails, without good cause, to appear at the scheduled hearing.
B. The administrative adjudicator shall not enter a default against any party for failure to file a written answer to the notice of hearing but shall base the initial decision upon the evidence presented at the hearing.
C. When the administrative adjudicator dismisses an appeal for reasons other than failure to appear, the decision of the administrative adjudicator shall be an initial decision, which shall not be implemented pending review by the Office of Appeals and entry of a final agency decision.
D. When an appellant fails to appear at a duly scheduled hearing, having been given proper notice, and without having given timely advance notice to the administrative adjudicator of acceptable good cause for inability to appear at the hearing at the time, date and place specified in the notice of hearing, then the appeal shall be considered abandoned, and an order of dismissal shall be entered by the administrative adjudicator and served upon the parties by the Office of Appeals (OOA). The order of dismissal for failure to appear shall not be implemented pending review by the OOA and entry of a final agency decision.

The appellant, however, shall be afforded a period of ten (10) calendar days from the date the order of dismissal was mailed, during which the appellant may explain in a letter to the administrative adjudicator the reason for his or her failure to appear. If the administrative adjudicator, then finds that there was acceptable good cause for the appellant not appearing, the administrative adjudicator shall vacate the order dismissing the appeal and reschedule another hearing date.

If the appellant does not submit a letter seeking to show good cause within a period of ten (10) calendar days, the order of dismissal shall be filed with the OOA. The OOA shall confirm the dismissal of the appeal by an agency decision, which shall be served upon the parties and the interested division of the State Department. Within three (3) working days after the effective date of the decision, the local office shall implement necessary actions to provide benefits in the correct amount, terminate benefits, recover benefits incorrectly paid, and/or other appropriate actions in accordance with the rules.

If the appellant submits a letter seeking to show good cause and the administrative adjudicator finds that the stated facts do not constitute good cause, the administrative adjudicator shall enter an initial decision confirming the dismissal.

4.802.63 State-Level Hearing Decisions
A. Decisions of the administrative adjudicator shall not run counter to Federal law, State Department rule, or state statute, and shall be based on the hearing record.

The exclusive record for an initial decision by the administrative adjudicator shall constitute the verbatim transcript or recording of testimony and exhibits, or an official report containing the substance of what transpired at the hearing, together with all papers and requests filed in the proceedings. This record shall be retained in accordance with normal retention periods. This record shall also be available to the household or its representative at any reasonable time for copying and inspection.

B. Following the conclusion of the state hearing, the administrative adjudicator shall promptly prepare and issue an initial decision and file it with the OOA.
C. Initial Decision
1. The administrative adjudicator shall render an initial decision within ten (10) calendar days of the hearing date. However, if the head of the household or the household's representative requests a delay in the proceedings, the time limit for action on the decision may be extended for as many days as the hearing is delayed, up to thirty (30) calendar days.
2. The initial decision shall make an initial determination whether the county or the Colorado Department of Human Services (CDHS) or its agent acted in accordance with, and/or properly interpreted, the rules of the State Department. The administrative adjudicator may determine whether statutes were properly interpreted and applied only when no implementing state rules exist. The administrative adjudicator has no jurisdiction or authority to determine issues of constitutionality or legality of departmental rules.
3. The initial decision shall advise the household that failure to file exceptions to provisions of the initial decision will waive the right to seek judicial review of a final agency decision affirming those provisions.
4. The Office of Appeals shall promptly serve the initial decision upon each party by first class mail and shall transmit a copy of the decision to the divisions of the State Department that administer the program(s) pertinent to the appeal.
5. The initial decision by the administrative adjudicator shall summarize the facts of the case, specify the reasons for the initial decision, and identify the supporting evidence and the pertinent rules.
6. The Office of Appeals at CDHS, as the designee of the Executive Director, shall review the initial decision of the administrative adjudicator and shall enter a final agency decision affirming, modifying, or reversing the initial decision. The Office of Appeals may issue an order of remand upon receipt of the initial decision and identification of an issue that warrants a remand before the initial decision is sent to the parties. Additionally, the Office of Appeals may issue an order of remand at the time of the substantive review of an initial decision for final agency decision. An order of remand is not a final agency decision that is subject to judicial review. The initial decision shall not be implemented pending review by the Office of Appeals and entry of a final agency decision. While review of the initial decision is pending before the Office of Appeals, the record on review, including any transcript or tape of testimony filed with the Office of Appeals, shall be available for examination by any party at the Office of Appeals during regular business hours.
D. Exceptions to the Initial Decision
1. Any party seeking a final agency decision that reverses, modifies, or remands the initial decision of the administrative adjudicator must file a written notice of intent to file exceptions to the decision with the OOA within five (5) calendar days - plus three (3) calendar days for mailing - from the date the initial decision is mailed to the parties. If the party has filed such a notice of intent, the party will have fifteen (15) calendar days, plus three (3) calendar days for mailing from the date the initial decision is mailed to the parties to file its written exceptions with the OOA. Exceptions shall state specific grounds for reversal, modification, or remand of the initial decision. Exceptions that fail to state specific grounds for reversal, modification, or remand of the initial decision shall be considered as only arguments of general dissatisfaction.
2. If any party asserts that the administrative adjudicator findings of fact are not supported by the weight of the evidence, the OOA will request the SNAP fair hearings unit provide an audio recording of the hearing to the OOA. If the local office asserts that the administrative adjudicator's findings of fact are not supported by the weight of the evidence, the local office shall provide a hearing transcript to the OOA on or before the deadline for the filing of exceptions. If the local office's yearly budget is not sufficient to pay the cost of a hearing transcript, the local office may request that the OOA review an audio recording of the hearing in lieu of a hearing transcript. Such requests must be mailed or emailed to the OOA at least five (5) calendar days before the deadline for the filing of exceptions. Additionally, the letter must indicate the insufficiency of the local office's budget to pay for a hearing transcript and the letter must be signed by the county department's director. The OOA shall issue an order regarding the request, and if granted, the OOA shall request the audio recording from the SNAP fair hearings unit. If the division(s) of the State Department responsible for administering the program(s) relevant to the appeal assert(s) that the administrative adjudicator's findings of fact are not supported by the weight of the evidence, it shall simultaneously with, or prior to the filing of exceptions, file a hearing transcript with the OOA on or before the deadline for filing exceptions.
3. Considering the federal timeliness requirements for SNAP cases, a party may not request an extension of time to file exceptions unless a party is able to show sufficient good cause as to why an extension of time should be granted. The determination of good cause is within the sole discretion of the OOA. When an extension of time is granted by the OOA, the extension shall not be for more than five (5) calendar days after the original exceptions filing deadline. Local offices or the State Department will need to immediately review initial decisions to assess any need to request an audio recording from the SNAP fair hearings unit to receive the audio recording and expedite the transcription of the audio recording through whatever transcription service it chooses. Any party requesting transcription services shall be fully responsible for the cost of such.
4. If the exceptions do not challenge the findings of fact, but instead assert only that the administrative adjudicator improperly interpreted or applied state rules or relevant statutes, no transcript review or audio recording review is required.
5. The OOA shall serve a copy of the exceptions on each party by first class mail and by electronic mail if the party has consented to receiving communications by electronic mail. Each party shall be limited to ten (10) calendar days from the date exceptions are mailed to the parties in which to file a written response to such exceptions. The OOA shall not permit oral argument.
6. The OOA shall not consider evidence that was not part of the record before the administrative adjudicator. However, the case may be remanded to the administrative adjudicator for rehearing if a party establishes in its exceptions that material evidence has been discovered that the party could not with reasonable diligence have produced at the hearing.
7. The division(s) of the State Department responsible for administering the program(s) relevant to the appeal may file exceptions to the initial decision, or respond to exceptions filed by a party, even though the Division has not previously appeared as a party to the appeal. The Division's exceptions shall be filed in compliance with the requirements of section 4.802.63, D, 1 and 2, above. Exceptions filed by a Division that did not appear as a party at the hearing shall be treated as requesting a review of the initial decision upon the State Department's own motion.
E. Final Agency Decisions
1. The OOA shall enter a final agency decision resolving the appeal within sixty (60) calendar days after the request for appeal was received by the SNAP fair hearings unit.
2. In the absence of exceptions filed by any party or by a division of the State Department, or when exceptions are filed, the OOA shall review the initial decision and may review the hearing file of the administrative adjudicator and/or the taped testimony of witnesses before entering a final agency decision. Review by the OOA shall determine whether the initial decision properly interprets and applies the rules of the State Department or relevant statutes and whether the findings of fact and conclusions of law support the decision. If a party or Division of the State Department objects to the final agency decision entered upon review by the OOA, the party or Division may seek reconsideration.
3. The OOA shall mail copies of the final agency decision to all parties by first class mail.
4. For purposes of requesting judicial review, the effective date of the final agency decision shall be the third (3rd) day after the date the decision is mailed to the parties, even if the third day falls on Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday. The parties shall be advised of this in the final agency decision.
F. Motion for Reconsideration of a Final Agency Decision
1. A motion for reconsideration of a final agency decision may be granted by the OOA for the following reasons:
a. Upon a showing of good cause for failure to file exceptions to the initial decision within the fifteen (15) calendar day period; or,
b. Upon a showing that the final agency decision is based upon a clear or plain error of fact or law. An error of law means failure by the OOA to follow a rule, statute, or court decision that controls the outcome of the appeal.
2. No motion for reconsideration shall be granted unless it is filed in writing with the OOA within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date that the final agency decision is mailed to the parties. The motion shall state specific grounds for reconsideration of the agency decision.
3. The OOA shall mail a copy of the motion for reconsideration to each party of record and to the appropriate Division of the State Department.
G. Acting on Decisions
1. Initial decisions shall not be implemented pending review by the OOA and entry of a final agency decision.
2. The State Department or local office shall initiate action to comply with the final agency decision within three (3) working days after the effective date. The acting department/office shall comply with the decision, even if reconsideration is requested, unless the effective date of the agency decision is postponed by order of the OOA or a reviewing court.
3. If it is ruled that the household had its SNAP benefits wrongfully delayed, denied, or terminated, the local office shall provide retroactive benefits. If it is decided that benefits were over-issued before and during the pendency of the determination of final agency action, a claim for over-issued benefits will be prepared.
4. Final agency decisions which result in an increase in household benefits shall be reflected in the benefit allotment within ten (10) days of the receipt of the decision, even if the local office is obligated to provide a supplementary allotment or otherwise provide the household with the opportunity to obtain the allotment outside of the normal cycle. However, the local office may take longer than ten (10) days if it elects to make the decision effective in the household's normal issuance cycle, provided that the issuance will occur within sixty (60) days from the household's request for the hearing.
5. Final agency decisions which result in a decrease in household benefits shall be reflected in the next scheduled issuance following receipt of the decision unless the decision is stayed by the OOA upon a showing of irreparable harm.

Notes

10 CCR 2506-1-4.802
37 CR 15, August 10, 2014, effective 9/1/2014 37 CR 21, November 10,2014, effective 12/1/2014 38 CR 23, December 10, 2015, effective 1/1/2016 39 CR 01, January 10, 2016, effective 2/1/2016 39 CR 05, March 10, 2016, effective 4/1/2016 39 CR 07, April 10, 2016, effective 5/1/2016 39 CR 15, August 10, 2016, effective 9/1/2016 39 CR 17, September 10, 2016, effective 10/1/2016 39 CR 19, October 10, 2016, effective 11/1/2016 39 CR 23, December 10, 2016, effective 1/1/2017 40 CR 11, June 10, 2017, effective 7/1/2017 40 CR 17, September 10, 2017, effective 10/1/2017 41 CR 15, August 10, 2018, effective 9/1/2018 40 CR 23, December 10, 2017, effective 12/30/2018 42 CR 01, January 10, 2019, effective 2/1/2019 42 CR 03, February 10, 2019, effective 3/15/2019 42 CR 17, September 10, 2019, effective 10/1/2019 42 CR 18, October 10, 2019, effective 10/1/2019 42 CR 23, December 10, 2019, effective 12/30/2019 43 CR 01, January 10, 2020, effective 1/30/2020 43 CR 05, March 10, 2020, effective 2/7/2020 43 CR 07, April 10, 2020, effective 4/30/2020 43 CR 21, November 10, 2020, effective 11/30/2020 44 CR 21, November 10, 2021, effective 11/30/2021 45 CR 05, March 10, 2022, effective 3/30/2022 45 CR 19, October 10, 2022, effective 10/1/2022 45 CR 19, October 10, 2022, effective 11/1/2022 45 CR 21, November 10, 2022, effective 11/30/2022 46 CR 17, September 10, 2023, effective 9/30/2023

State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.


No prior version found.