Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. R. 110-12-7-.03 - Local Government Responsibilities
(1) The local government must follow the
applicable procedures identified under DRI Communication Procedures detailed in
Chapter 110-12-7-.02
when:
1) an applicant (developer, builder, or
landowner who is proposing the new development) requests some type of local
government action related to a proposed development project, such as, but not
limited to, a request for rezoning, annexation, zoning variance, building or
land disturbance permit, hookup to a water or sewer system, master or site plan
approval, acceptance of a public street, signing off on a subdivision plat,
comprehensive plan amendment, or entering into a contract; and
2) it appears that the proposed development
may meet or exceed the applicable DRI thresholds.
(2) When a local government proposes a
project that may meet or exceed the DRI thresholds, the local government
becomes the applicant and must submit the project to the Regional Commission as
a potential DRI.
(3) If a proposed
development will be located in more than one jurisdiction and, in total, the
proposed development meets or exceeds a DRI threshold; the local government in
which the greatest acreage of the project is to be located is responsible for
submitting the project to the Regional Commission as a potential DRI.
(4)
The host local government may
proceed with its development review process during the DRI process, provided
that it does not take final official action approving a project until the DRI
process is completed and the local government has had adequate time to consider
the Regional Commission's DRI report. It is intended that the DRI
process should take place simultaneously with local development review
procedures in order to minimize administrative delay for review and approval of
large developments. Examples of local development review activities that may
take place during the DRI process include, but are not limited to, preliminary
staff administrative functions, project evaluation/assessment, community
participation meetings and hearings, site visits, and planning commission
meetings to discuss, but not vote on, the proposed local action that triggered
the DRI process.
(5) Failure of a
local government to submit a project that exceeds the applicable DRI thresholds
to the Regional Commission for determination of whether it qualifies as a DRI
or to wait until the DRI process is completed before taking final action will
result in the following corrective course of action:
(a) On the first occurrence, the Regional
Commission staff will meet with the local government to carefully explain the
DRI process, benefits of participating in this process, and possible
consequences of not participating.
(b) If, within two years of the meeting
above, a local government again fails to submit a qualifying project or to wait
until the DRI process is completed prior to taking final action the project,
the Regional Commission will inform the Department. The Board of Community
Affairs will evaluate the situation and determine an appropriate response which
may include suspension of the local government's Qualified Local Government
status for a period of up to 1 year.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.