Ill. Admin. Code tit. 2, § 3500.325 - Conflicts of Interest
a) Commissioners
shall disqualify themselves from an investigation or a proceeding when the
Commissioner's impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not
limited to the following instances:
1) The
Commissioner has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or the party's
lawyer;
2) The Commissioner has
personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the matter in
controversy; "Personal knowledge" does not include facts learned pursuant to
official duties as a Commissioner or agent of the Commission. A "disputed
evidentiary fact" does not include facts generally known or capable of accurate
and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably
be questioned;
3) The Commissioner
served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy, or took actions in the matter
in controversy that were covered by the attorney-client privilege and the
privilege was held by the claimant or the State;
4) The Commissioner served as a law
enforcement agent investigating the matter in controversy; the duty to recuse
does not extend to investigation undertaken as part of official TIRC duties to
investigate or adjudicate a TIRC claim;
5) The Commissioner advocated, as an attorney
or otherwise, for or against the claimant or the State in the matter in
controversy;
6) The Commissioner
served as a lawyer for a co-defendant of the claimant in the matter in
controversy;
7) The Commissioner
could reasonably expect to be called as a material witness in the matter in
controversy should an evidentiary hearing be held in any court of competent
jurisdiction; the duty to recuse does not extend to knowledge gained as part of
official TIRC duties to investigate or adjudicate a TIRC claim;
8) Within the three years before a proceeding
is considered before the Commission, the Commissioner was in the private
practice of law with a law firm that currently represents or previously
represented the claimant in the proceedings before TIRC;
9) The Commissioner has an economic interest
in the matter in controversy or the Commissioner knows that the Commissioner's
spouse, parent, child, or member of the Commissioner's family residing with the
Commissioner has an economic interest in the proceeding, or has anything other
than a de minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the
proceeding;
10) For purposes of
this subsubsection (a)(10), "third degree of relationship" is defined as a
great-grandparent, grandparent, parent, uncle, aunt, brother, sister, child,
grandchild, great-grandchild, nephew or niece. The Commissioner or the
Commissioner's spouse, or any person within the third degree of relationship to
either of them, is:
A) a party or former party
to the proceeding;
B) acting or has
acted as a lawyer in the proceeding;
C) is known to the Commissioner to have more
than a de minimis interest in the proceeding that could be substantially
affected by the proceeding; or
D)
is, to the Commissioner's knowledge, likely to be a material witness in the
proceeding.
b) For purposes of subsection (a), the
"matter in controversy" includes but is not limited to the investigation of,
prosecution of, defense of, or adjudication of the claimant or the claimant's
case in the underlying criminal investigation and court proceedings. It also
includes the investigation of, prosecution of, defense of, or adjudication of
the claimant or the claimant's case in any civil lawsuit directly related to
the underlying criminal investigation and court proceedings.
c) Commissioners recusing themselves from a
proceeding shall notify the Chair or Executive Director expeditiously after a
conflict of interest is recognized so that other administrative arrangements
may be made.
d) Commissioners
recusing themselves from a vote on a proceeding shall publicly announce the
recusal prior to the vote. If the recusal occurs in closed session, the
recusing Commissioner shall publicly announce the recusal at the first public
meeting to consider the matter in controversy. An explanation of the reason for
the recusal is encouraged but not required.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.