a) Procedure to Determine Average Volatile
Organic (VO) Concentration
1) Determining
average VO concentration at the point of material origination. A remanufacturer
or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material must
determine the average VO concentration at the point of material origination for
each hazardous secondary material placed in a hazardous secondary material
management unit exempted under the provisions of Section
721.982(c)(1)
from using air emission controls in accordance with standards specified in
Sections
721.984 through
721.987,
as applicable to the hazardous secondary material management unit.
A) An initial determination of the average VO
concentration of the material stream must be made before the first time any
portion of the material in the hazardous secondary material stream is placed in
a hazardous secondary material management unit exempted under the provisions of
Section
721.982(c)(1)
from using air emission controls, and thereafter an initial determination of
the average VO concentration of the material stream must be made for each
averaging period that a hazardous secondary material is managed in the unit;
and
B) Perform a new material
determination whenever changes to the source generating the material stream are
reasonably likely to cause the average VO concentration of the hazardous
secondary material to increase to a level that is equal to or greater than the
applicable VO concentration limits specified in Section 721.982.
2) Determination of average VO
concentration using direct measurement or knowledge. For a material
determination that is required by subsection (a)(1), the average VO
concentration of a hazardous secondary material at the point of material
origination must be determined using either direct measurement, as specified in
subsection (a)(3), or by knowledge of the hazardous secondary material, as
specified in subsection (a)(4).
3)
Direct measurement to determine average VO concentration of a hazardous
secondary material at the point of material origination, as follows:
A) Identification. The remanufacturer or
other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material must
identify and record in a log that is kept at the facility the point of material
origination for the hazardous secondary material.
B) Sampling. Samples of the hazardous
secondary material stream must be collected at the point of material
origination in a manner such that volatilization of organics contained in the
material and in the subsequent sample is minimized and an adequately
representative sample is collected and maintained for analysis by the selected
method.
i) The averaging period to be used
for determining the average VO concentration for the hazardous secondary
material stream on a mass-weighted average basis must be designated and
recorded. The averaging period can represent any time interval that the
remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary
material determines is appropriate for the hazardous secondary material stream
but must not exceed one year.
ii) A
sufficient number of samples, but no less than four samples, must be collected
and analyzed for a hazardous secondary material determination. All of the
samples for a given material determination must be collected within a one-hour
period. The average of the four or more sample results constitutes a material
determination for the material stream. One or more material determinations may
be required to represent the complete range of material compositions and
quantities that occur during the entire averaging period due to normal
variations in the operating conditions for the source or process generating the
hazardous secondary material stream. Examples of such normal variations are
seasonal variations in material quantity or fluctuations in ambient
temperature.
iii) All samples must
be collected and handled in accordance with written procedures prepared by the
remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary
material and documented in a site sampling plan. This plan must describe the
procedure by which representative samples of the hazardous secondary material
stream are collected such that a minimum loss of organics occurs throughout the
sample collection and handling process, and by which sample integrity is
maintained. A copy of the written sampling plan must be maintained at the
facility. An example of acceptable sample collection and handling procedures
for a total volatile organic constituent concentration may be found in
Reference Method 25D (Determination of the Volatile Organic Concentration of
Waste Samples) in appendix A to 40 CFR
60 (Test Methods), incorporated by
reference in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
720.111.
iv) Sufficient information, as specified in
the "site sampling plan" required under subsection (a)(3)(B)(iii), must be
prepared and recorded to document the material quantity represented by the
samples and, as applicable, the operating conditions for the source or process
generating the hazardous secondary material represented by the
samples.
C) Analysis.
Each collected sample must be prepared and analyzed in accordance with
Reference Method 25D (Determination of the Volatile Organic Concentration of
Waste Samples) in appendix A to 40 CFR
60 (Test Methods), incorporated by
reference in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
720.111, for the total concentration of volatile
organic constituents, or using one or more methods when the individual organic
compound concentrations are identified and summed and the summed material
concentration accounts for and reflects all organic compounds in the material
with Henry's law constant values at least 0.1
mole-fraction-in-the-gas-phase/mole-fraction-in-the-liquid-phase (0.1 Y/X)
(which can also be expressed as
1.8 x
10
-6
atmospheres/gram-mole/m
3) at 25 °C. At the
discretion of the remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the
hazardous secondary material, the test data obtained may be adjusted by any
appropriate method to discount any contribution to the total volatile organic
concentration that is a result of including a compound with a Henry's law
constant value of less than 0.1 Y/X at 25 °C. To adjust these data, the
measured concentration of each individual chemical constituent contained in the
material is multiplied by the appropriate constituent-specific adjustment
factor (fm
25D). If the remanufacturer or other person
that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material elects to adjust the
test data, the adjustment must be made to all individual chemical constituents
with a Henry's law constant value greater than or equal to 0.1 Y/X at 25 °C
contained in the material. To adjust these data, the measured concentration of
each individual chemical constituent contained in the waste is multiplied by
the constituent-specific adjustment factors (fm
25D)
approved in writing by the Agency. Other test methods may be used if they meet
the requirements in subsection (a)(3)(C)(i) or (a)(3)(C)(ii) and provided the
requirement to reflect all organic compounds in the material with Henry's law
constant values greater than or equal to 0.1 Y/X (which can also be expressed
as
1.8 x
10
-6
atmospheres/gram-mole/m
3) at 25 °C, is met.
i) Any USEPA standard method that has been
validated in accordance with appendix D to 40 CFR
63 (Alternative Validation
Procedure for EPA Waste and Wastewater Methods), incorporated by reference in
35 Ill. Adm. Code
720.111.
ii) Any
other analysis method that has been validated in accordance with the procedures
specified in Section 5.1 or Section 5.3, and the corresponding calculations in
Section 6.1 or Section 6.3, of Method 301 (Field Validation of Pollutant
Measurement Methods from Various Waste Media) in appendix A to 40 CFR
63 (Test
Methods), incorporated by reference in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
720.111. The data are
acceptable if they meet the criteria specified in Section 6.1.5 or Section
6.3.3 of Method 301. If correction is required under section 6.3.3 of Method
301, the data are acceptable if the correction factor is within the range 0.7
to
1.30. Other
sections of Method 301 are not required.
D) Calculations
i) The average VO concentration (
Click here to view
image) on a mass-weighted basis must be calculated by using the
results for all material determinations conducted in accordance with
subsections (a)(3)(B) and (a)(3)(C) and the following equation:
Click here to
view image
Where:
Click here to view
image
|
=
|
Average VO concentration of the hazardous secondary
material at the point of material origination on a mass-weighted basis,
ppmw
|
i
|
=
|
Individual material determination "i" of the
hazardous secondary material
|
n
|
=
|
Total number of material determinations of the
hazardous secondary material conducted for the averaging period (not to exceed
one year)
|
Qi
|
=
|
Mass quantity of hazardous secondary material stream
represented by Ci, kg/hr
|
QT
|
=
|
Total mass quantity of hazardous secondary material
during the averaging period, kg/hr
|
Ci
|
=
|
Measured VO concentration of material determination
"i" as determined in accordance with the requirements of subsection (a)(3)(C)
(i.e., the average of the four or more samples specified in subsection
(a)(3)(B)(ii)), ppmw
|
ii)
For the purpose of determining C
i, for individual
material samples analyzed in accordance with subsection (a)(3)(C), the
remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary
material must account for VO concentrations determined to be below the limit of
detection of the analytical method by using the VO concentration that is
one-half the blank value determined in the method at section 4.4 of Reference
Method 25D, if Reference Method 25D is used for the analysis; or that is
one-half the sum of the limits of detection established for each organic
constituent in the material that has a Henry's law constant values at least 0.1
mole-fraction-in-the-gas-phase/mole-fraction-in-the-liquid-phase (0.1 Y/X)
(which can also be expressed as
1.8 x
10
-6
atmospheres/gram-mole/m
3) at 25 °C, if any other
analytical method is used.
4) Use of knowledge by the remanufacturer or
other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material to
determine average VO concentration of a hazardous secondary material at the
point of material origination.
A)
Documentation must be prepared that presents the information used as the basis
for the knowledge by the remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats
the hazardous secondary material of the hazardous secondary material stream's
average VO concentration. Examples of information that may be used as the basis
for knowledge include material balances for the source or process generating
the hazardous secondary material stream; constituent-specific chemical test
data for the hazardous secondary material stream from previous testing that are
still applicable to the current material stream; previous test data for other
locations managing the same type of material stream; or other knowledge based
on information included in shipping papers or material certification
notices.
B) If test data are used
as the basis for knowledge, then the remanufacturer or other person that stores
or treats the hazardous secondary material must document the test method,
sampling protocol, and the means by which sampling variability and analytical
variability are accounted for in the determination of the average VO
concentration. For example, a remanufacturer or other person that stores or
treats the hazardous secondary material may use organic concentration test data
for the hazardous secondary material stream that are validated in accordance
with Method 301 (Field Validation of Pollutant Measurement Methods from Various
Waste Media) in appendix A to 40 CFR
63 (Test Methods) as the basis for
knowledge of the material.
C) A
remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary
material using chemical constituent-specific concentration test data as the
basis for knowledge of the hazardous secondary material may adjust the test
data to the corresponding average VO concentration value which would have been
obtained had the material samples been analyzed using Reference Method 25D
(Determination of the Volatile Organic Concentration of Waste Samples) in
appendix A to 40 CFR
60 (Test Methods), incorporated by reference in 35 Ill.
Adm. Code
720.111(b).
To adjust these data, the measured concentration for each individual chemical
constituent contained in the material is multiplied by the appropriate
constituent-specific adjustment factor
(fm
25D).
D)
In the event that the Agency and the remanufacture or other person that stores
or treats the hazardous secondary material disagree on a determination of the
average VO concentration for a hazardous secondary material stream using
knowledge, then the results from a determination of average VO concentration
using direct measurement as specified in subsection (a)(3) must be used to
establish compliance with the applicable requirements of this Subpart CC. The
Agency may perform or request that the remanufacturer or other person that
stores or treats the hazardous secondary material perform this determination
using direct measurement. The remanufacturer or other person that stores or
treats the hazardous secondary material may choose one or more appropriate
methods to analyze each collected sample in accordance with the requirements of
subsection (a)(3)(C). The Agency must state any disagreement on determination
of the average VO concentration for a hazardous secondary material stream using
knowledge in writing to the remanufacturer or other person that stores or
treats the hazardous secondary material.
c) Procedure
to Determine the Maximum Organic Vapor Pressure of a Hazardous Secondary
Material in a Tank
1) A remanufacturer or
other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material must
determine the maximum organic vapor pressure for each hazardous secondary
material placed in a tank using Tank Level 1 controls in accordance with
standards specified in Section
721.984(c).
2) A remanufacturer or other person that
stores or treats the hazardous secondary material must use either direct
measurement as specified in subsection (c)(3) or knowledge of the waste as
specified by subsection (c)(4) to determine the maximum organic vapor pressure
which is representative of the hazardous secondary material composition stored
or treated in the tank.
3) Direct
Measurement to Determine the Maximum Organic Vapor Pressure of a Hazardous
Secondary Material
A) Sampling. A sufficient
number of samples must be collected to be representative of the hazardous
secondary material contained in the tank. All samples must be collected and
handled in accordance with written procedures prepared by the remanufacturer or
other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material and
documented in a site sampling plan. This plan must describe the procedure by
which representative samples of the hazardous secondary material are collected
such that a minimum loss of organics occurs throughout the sample collection
and handling process and by which sample integrity is maintained. A copy of the
written sampling plan must be maintained at the facility. An example of
acceptable sample collection and handling procedures may be found in Reference
Method 25D (Determination of the Volatile Organic Concentration of Waste
Samples) in appendix A to 40 CFR
60 (Test Methods), incorporated by reference
in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
720.111(b).
B) Analysis. Any appropriate one of the
following methods may be used to analyze the samples and compute the maximum
organic vapor pressure of the hazardous secondary material:
i) Reference Method 25E (Determination of
Vapor Phase Organic Concentration in Waste Samples) in appendix A to 40 CFR
60
(Test Methods), incorporated by reference in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
720.111(b);
ii) Methods described in American Petroleum
Institute Publication 2517, Third Edition, February 1989, "Evaporative Loss
from External Floating-Roof Tanks", incorporated by reference in 35 Ill. Adm.
Code
720.111;
iii) Methods obtained
from standard reference texts;
iv)
ASTM Method 2879-92, incorporated by reference in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
720.111;
and
v) Any other method approved in
writing by the Agency.
4) Use of Knowledge to Determine the Maximum
Organic Vapor Pressure of the Hazardous Secondary Material. Documentation must
be prepared and recorded that presents the information used as the basis for
the knowledge by the remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the
hazardous secondary material that the maximum organic vapor pressure of the
hazardous secondary material is less than the maximum vapor pressure limit
listed in Section
721.984(b)(1)(A)
for the applicable tank design capacity category. An example of information
that may be used is documentation that the hazardous secondary material is
generated by a process for which at other locations it previously has been
determined by direct measurement that the hazardous secondary material's
maximum organic vapor pressure is less than the maximum vapor pressure limit
for the appropriate tank design capacity category.
d) Procedure for Determining No Detectable
Organic Emissions for the Purpose of Complying with this Subpart CC
1) The test must be conducted in accordance
with the procedures specified in Reference Method 21 (Determination of Volatile
Organic Compound Leaks) in appendix A to 40 CFR
60 (Test Methods), incorporated
by reference in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
720.111. Each potential leak interface (i.e.,
a location where organic vapor leakage could occur) on the cover and associated
closure devices must be checked. Potential leak interfaces that are associated
with covers and closure devices include, but are not limited to, the interface
of the cover and its foundation mounting, the periphery of any opening on the
cover and its associated closure device, and the sealing seat interface on a
spring-loaded pressure relief valve.
2) The test must be performed when the unit
contains a hazardous secondary material having an organic concentration
representative of the range of concentrations for the hazardous secondary
material expected to be managed in the unit. During the test, the cover and
closure devices must be secured in the closed position.
3) The detection instrument must meet the
performance criteria of Reference Method 21, except the instrument response
factor criteria in section 3.1.2(a) of Reference Method 21, must be for the
average composition of the organic constituents in the hazardous secondary
material placed in the hazardous secondary management unit, not for each
individual organic constituent.
4)
The detection instrument must be calibrated before use on each day of its use
by the procedures specified in Reference Method 21.
5) Calibration gases must be as follows:
A) Zero air (less than 10 ppmv hydrocarbon in
air), and
B) A mixture of methane
or n-hexane and air at a concentration of approximately, but less than, 10,000
ppmv methane or n-hexane.
6) The background level must be determined
according to the procedures in Reference Method 21.
7) Each potential leak interface must be
checked by traversing the instrument probe around the potential leak interface
as close to the interface as possible, as described in Reference Method 21. If
the configuration of the cover or closure device prevents a complete traverse
of the interface, all accessible portions of the interface must be sampled. If
the configuration of the closure device prevents any sampling at the interface
and the device is equipped with an enclosed extension or horn (e.g., some
pressure relief devices), the instrument probe inlet must be placed at
approximately the center of the exhaust area to the atmosphere.
8) The arithmetic difference between the
maximum organic concentration indicated by the instrument and the background
level must be compared with the value of 500 ppmv except when monitoring a seal
around a rotating shaft that passes through a cover opening, in which case the
comparison must be as specified in subsection (d)(9). If the difference is less
than 500 ppmv, then the potential leak interface is determined to operate with
no detectable organic emissions.
9)
For the seals around a rotating shaft that passes through a cover opening, the
arithmetic difference between the maximum organic concentration indicated by
the instrument and the background level must be compared with the value of
10,000 ppmw. If the difference is less than 10,000 ppmw, then the potential
leak interface is determined to operate with no detectable organic
emissions.