Ill. Admin. Code tit. 86, § 100.2657 - Subtraction Modification for High Impact Business Interest (IITA Section 203(b)(2)(M-1))
a) A
corporation that is a "financial organization" within the meaning of IITA
Section 304(c) may subtract an amount included in its taxable income as
interest income from a loan or loans made by such taxpayer to a borrower, to
the extent that such a loan is secured by property which is eligible for the
High Impact Business Investment Credit under IITA Section 201(h). (IITA Section
203(b)(2)(M-1))
b) Coordination
with Subtraction for Enterprise Zone Interest. Notwithstanding subsection (a),
a taxpayer may not claim a subtraction modification under IITA Section
203(b)(2)(M-1) and this Section for any taxable year in which the taxpayer is
allowed to claim the subtraction modification under IITA Section 203(b)(2)(M)
and Section
100.2655
of this Part for interest on a loan secured by property eligible for the
enterprise zone investment credit or river edge redevelopment zone investment
credit. (IITA Section 203(b)(2)(M-1))
c) Eligible Property. For purposes of this
Section, "eligible property" shall mean property that is "qualified property",
as defined under IITA Section 201(h) and Section
100.2130(e)
of this Part, and that is placed in service on or after the date the owner is
designated as a high impact business by the Department of Commerce and Economic
Opportunity. To be considered eligible property, it is not necessary that the
property be placed in service in a federally designated foreign trade zone or
subzone.
d) Portion of Loan Secured
by Eligible Property. To determine the portion of a loan that is secured by
eligible property, the entire principal amount of the loan between the taxpayer
and the borrower should be divided into the basis of the eligible property
which secures the loan, using for this purpose the original basis of such
property on the date it was placed in service. The subtraction modification
available to the taxpayer in any year under IITA Section 203(b)(2)(M-1) shall
be that portion of the total interest paid by the borrower with respect to such
loan attributable to the eligible property as calculated under the previous
sentence. (IITA Section 203(b)(2)(M-1)) There is no limitation to the length of
time for which the subtraction may be taken with respect to a particular
loan.
e) Basis. For purposes of the
computation in subsection (d), the basis of eligible property shall be its
borrower's basis in the eligible property for federal income tax purposes,
including the costs of any improvements or repairs included in that basis, but
without adjustment for depreciation or IRC section 179 deductions claimed with
respect to the property.
f)
Examples. The provisions of IITA Section 203(b)(2)(M-1) and this Section may be
illustrated by the following examples.
1)
EXAMPLE 1. Bank lends $1,000 to Borrower, secured by eligible property with a
basis of $900. The portion of the loan secured by eligible property is the $900
basis of the borrower in eligible property divided by the $1,000 principal
amount of the loan, or 90%.
2)
EXAMPLE 2. Bank lends $1,000 to Borrower, secured by eligible property with a
basis of $1,000 and by other property with a basis of $2,000. The portion of
the loan secured by eligible property is the $1,000 basis of the borrower in
eligible property divided by the $1,000 principal amount of the loan, or 100%.
The existence of other property securing the loan is irrelevant.
3) EXAMPLE 3. In 2008, DCEO designated ABC
Company a high impact business. In 2009, ABC Company built a new warehouse at
the cost of $1,000,000 and is able to claim the high impact business investment
credit under IITA Section 201(h) with respect to the warehouse. ABC takes out a
$2,000,000 loan at Bank A, which then places a lien on the property. In 2010,
when the warehouse had an adjusted basis (after depreciation) of $900,000 and a
fair market value of $1,300,000, ABC refinanced the loan for the same principal
amount, but at a lower interest rate. For both loans, the portion of the loan
secured by eligible property is the $1,000,000 original basis in the warehouse
divided by the $2,000,000 principal. Neither the adjusted basis after
depreciation nor the fair market value is relevant to the computation for the
refinanced amount.
4) EXAMPLE 4.
Assume the facts are the same as in Example 3, except that, in 2011, ABC
Company again refinanced the loan, this time at Bank B (unrelated to Bank A).
There was no change in the principal amount. Bank B takes a lien on the
warehouse to secure the new loan. The portion of the Bank B loan that qualifies
for the subtraction modification is 50% because the principal amount of the
loan and ABC Company's original basis in the property remain
unchanged.
5) EXAMPLE 5. The facts
are the same as in Example 4, except that Bank B purchased the refinanced loan
from Bank A. The loan is not refinanced. ABC continues to pay the same amount,
but now pays Bank B rather than Bank A. Bank B does not qualify for the
subtraction modification, which is allowed only with respect to a loan "made by
such taxpayer to a borrower" and Bank B did not make the loan.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.