Iowa Admin. Code r. 199-40.5 - Request for proposals (RFP)
The request for proposals shall clearly set forth the eligibility and evaluation criteria and shall specify the weight to be given to any price or nonprice selection criteria.
(1)
Minimum evaluation
criteria. The price and nonprice factors selected for evaluation and
the weightings attached to each can reasonably vary from utility to utility and
project to project. However, the following factors shall be considered for each
supply-side project solicitation:
a. Level and
schedule of required capacity and energy payments;
b. Status of project development;
c. System fuel diversity;
d. Reliability and performance
measures;
e. Firm versus variable
or indexed pricing;
f.
Dispatchability;
g. Project
location and effect on the transmission grid;
h. Use of Iowa fuels, manpower, and other
state resources;
i. Benefits to be
derived by the industries and communities associated with a particular
project;
j. Demonstrated financial
viability of the project and the developer;
k. Developer's prior experience in the
field.
(2)
Contents of the request for proposals. The RFP shall contain
sufficient information to apprise potential bidders of the utility's criteria
for evaluation of bids received as part of the competitive resource acquisition
process specified in 199 lAC 40.2(476). This information shall include the bid
evaluation criteria, including the weights to be assigned to each criterion,
that the utility plans to use in ranking the bids received. Specific
information associated with the bid evaluation criteria provided by the utility
shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Preferred fuel types;
b. The extent to which additional supply-side
resources must be located in certain geographic areas due to transmission
constraints, local load condition, permitting constraints, or other
factors;
c. Important transmission
constraints on the utility's system and on adjoining utility systems, and
reasonable estimates of transmission costs for supply-side resources located in
different areas;
d. The extent and
degree to which supply-side resources must be dispatchable, including the
requirement, if any, that supply-side resources be able to operate under
automatic dispatch control;
e.
Supply-side resource reliability requirements and objectives, and the method(s)
that will be used to measure the achievement of those requirements and
objectives, including the contribution of individual supply-side
resources;
f. The desirability of
firm pricing and contract terms of various durations;
g. The minimum bid evaluation criteria that
must be met by a bidder for a bid to be considered responsive to the RFP. The
utility shall be reasonable in its specification of minimum bid evaluation
criteria and shall not artificially limit the pool of bidders through
unreasonable or excessively restrictive minimum criteria;
h. The utility's proposed standard contract
for the acquisition of supply-side resources.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.