La. Admin. Code tit. 41, § II-910 - Determination Required by the Adjutant General
A. Except where the TAG's determination is
not required on the Article 138 complaint under the preceding paragraphs, the
TAG will take the following actions.
1.
Examination into the Complaint. The TAG will examine into the complaint. Except
as provided below, the nature and method of the examination is discretionary.
The examination may be delegated, but not to a person subordinate to the
respondent in the chain of command nor, except for good cause explained in the
correspondence forwarding the complaint, to a person junior in rank to the
respondent. Examinations so delegated will be conducted in accordance with AR
15-6 and will include a specific recommendation regarding the appropriateness
of the redress requested and of any other corrective action.
2. Nature and Extent of Examination. Unless
the TAG believes that established channels for redressing the alleged wrong
would be inadequate in the particular case, the examination will be limited to
determining whether the other channels are, in fact, available for resolving
the alleged wrong. Specific findings will be made as to whether the act or
omission complained of was :
a. in violation
of law or regulation;
b. beyond the
legitimate authority of the respondent;
c. arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of
discretion;
d. materially
unfair.
3. Action on the
Complaint. The TAG must act personally on the Article 138 complaint. This
authority may not be delegated. After examination into the complaint is
completed, TAG will take the first of the following actions which applies to
the particular complaint:
a. If the alleged
wrong is of an inappropriate subject matter for an Article 138 complaint [See
paragraph 9-3], unless the TAG believes that established channels for
redressing the alleged wrong would be inadequate in the particular case, such
commanding officer will advise the complainant that:
i. the alleged wrong already is being
considered in other official channels, if that is the case; or
ii. a more appropriate official channel is
available to redress the alleged wrong. TAG will specify that channel, any
applicable regulation under which the complainant may proceed, and any DA or
DAF assistance available to the complainant in using that channel.
iii. determine the merits of the complaint
and of the redress requested. If no redress is appropriate, the TAG will deny
the redress. The TAG will grant whatever redress is appropriate and is within
such his authority to provide.
b. TAG will notify the complainant in writing
of the action taken on the complaint.
4. Action by TAG. Before final disposition by
TAG, each Article 138 file will be reviewed by the State Judge Advocate (or
that officer's designee) for legal sufficiency. The SJA may, in that officer's
discretion, return the file for additional information or investigation or for
other action.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.