06-096 C.M.R. ch. 113, § 5 - Quantification of Offset Credits for Credit Generators
A. Offset credits shall be quantified in an
average hourly or daily emission rate expressed in pounds.
B. Quantification of offset credits shall
follow the two-step process provided below, including quantification of the
base credit and adjustment of the base credit for compliance
assurance.
C. Step One: Replicable
methods must be used to establish the baseline which reflects the lower of
actual or allowable emissions and which serves as the level below which
emission reductions are considered surplus, and to quantify base credit
reflecting the real emission reduction below baseline. Replicable methods must
include the following, as appropriate, for the specific offset credit
application:
(1) Continuous Emission
Monitoring System (CEMS): Direct determination through the use of a certified
CEMS; or
(2) Mass Balance
Calculations: Mass balance calculations which are a function of process and
control equipment parameters, inventory records, usage and disposal records,
activity levels, and/or throughput production consistent with good engineering
practice and methods as approved by the Department and EPA; or
(3) Stack Testing: Calculations based on
direct measurement of emissions by use of a test method contained in 40 C.F.R.
Part 60 Appendices; or
(4) Capture
and Control Efficiencies: Testing of capture and control efficiencies using
approved testing methods, mass balance, and corresponding calculations as
approved by the Department and EPA; or
(5) Parametric Monitoring: Parametric
monitoring programs approved by the Department where the owner or operator
identifies one or more indicators of the performance of an applicable control
device or process at a pollutant-specific emission unit subject to this
Chapter, and, for each indicator identified, provides a credible demonstration
of the validity of the indicator monitored which includes the following:
(a) The demonstrated relationship between the
indicator and emissions from the emissions specific unit; and
(b) The demonstrated margin of compliance
with the applicable emission standard; and
(c) The potential variability of emissions
under normal and anticipated operating conditions; or
(6) Emission Factors: Use of EPA-approved
emission factors for pollutants and for estimates of capture and controls, with
and emission calculation methods described in "Compilation of Air Pollutant
Emission Factors, EPA, AP-42 Volume 1: Stationary and Area Sources," including
the most recent supplements at the time of application; and "Guidance for
Procedures for Emission Inventory Preparation," U.S. EPA 450/4-81-02, as is
appropriate for the application under consideration.
D. Step Two: Emission reductions will be
certified by the Department as offset credits after application of a compliance
assurance multiplier reflecting the method of measurement used to determine the
base credit numerical value. The applicable compliance assurance multiplier
will be determined as provided in the table below.
Method of Measurement |
Compliance Assurance Multiplier |
Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) |
0.95 |
Mass Balance Calculations |
0.95 |
Stack Testing |
0.85 |
Capture and Control Efficiencies |
as set by the Department and EPA |
Parametric Monitoring |
0.50 - 0.85, as determined by the Department and EPA |
Emission Factors |
0.50 - 0.85, as determined by the Department and EPA |
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.