71.02
DEFINITIONS
The following words and phrases will have the following
meanings:
(A)
"Access to
care" means the ability to obtain in a timely manner needed personal
health services to achieve the best possible health outcomes balanced by the
health system's resource limitations. Access to care may be influenced by many
factors, including, without limitation, travel, distance, waiting time,
available resources, availability of a source of care and the health status of
the population served.
(B)
"Annual operating costs" means, the total incremental costs to the
facility which are directly attributable to the addition of a new health
service.
(C)
"Appropriately
capitalized expenditures" mean, those expenditures which would be
capitalized if the project were implemented.
(D)
"Bed capacity" means, the
licensed capacity of a nursing facility for each level of care it
provides.
(E)
"Bed
complement" means, licensed beds that are set up and staffed and
normally available for use.
(F)
"Capital expenditure" means, an expenditure, including a force
account expenditure or pre development activities, that under generally
accepted accounting principles is not properly chargeable as an expense of
operation, and, for the purpose of these rules, shall include capitalized
interest on borrowed funds and the fair market value of any property or
equipment which is acquired under lease or comparable arrangement or by
donation.
(G) RESERVED
(H)
"Commenced" or
"commencement" means, that:
(1)
Purchase or lease of equipment, buildings, existing facilities, or land, that
the sale or lease has been consummated and the buyer or lessor is in possession
and the property is being used for the purpose described in the application for
which the CON was issued;
(2) For
the new construction of a facility, part thereof, or associated structure, all
pre development activity necessary to meet the remaining elements of this
provision has been completed, the site has been cleared, the foundation has
been fully laid and at least 50% of the approved capital expenditure has been
obligated, except for projects with approved capital expenditures in excess of
$10 million where at least 50% of the portion of the total capital expenditure
which was originally forecast to be completed during the 12 months following
the issuance of the CON, or any extension thereto, must be obligated.
(3) For pre development activities, all such
activities to be completed are fully obligated and such obligation requires
that they be completed within the following six months;
(4) For modification of a health care
facility not adequately covered by the above-listed requirements, all pre
development activity necessary to meet the remaining elements of this provision
has been completed and at least 50% of the approved capital expenditure has
been obligated;
(5) For new health
services, the service is fully operational;
(6) For termination of a health service, the
service has been terminated and all approved capital expenditures have been
obligated; or
(7) For changes in
bed complement, the change has been completed.
(I)
"Construction" means, the
establishment, erection, building, purchase or other acquisition of a health
care facility.
(J)
"Cost" means, when used in conjunction with the review threshold
for major medical equipment, all amounts which, under generally accepted
accounting principles, are not properly chargeable as an expense of operation
and maintenance and shall include the costs of installing and making the
equipment operational as well as the fair market value of any equipment
acquired through lease or comparable arrangement or by donation.
(K)
"Department" means, the
Department of Human Services.
(L)
"Development" means, when used in connection with "health
service," the undertaking of those activities that on their completion will
result in the offering of a new health service to the public.
(M)
"Expenditure minimum for annual
operating costs" for services commenced after October 1, 1998, means
$400,000 for the 3rd fiscal year, including a partial first year.
(N)
"Generally accepted accounting
principles" means, accounting principles approved by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants or a successor organization.
(O)
"Health care
facility" means a hospital, psychiatric hospital, nursing facility,
kidney disease treatment center, including a freestanding hemodialysis
facility, rehabilitation facility, ambulatory surgical facility, independent
radiological service center, independent cardiac catheterization center or
cancer treatment center. The term does not include the office of a private
health care practitioner, as defined in Title
24 M.R.S.A.,
Section2502, subsection 1-A, whether in
individual or group practice.
(P)
"Health maintenance organizations" means a public or private
organization that:
(1) Provides or otherwise
makes available to enrolled participants health care services, including at
least the following basic health services: usual physician services,
hospitalization services, laboratory services, x-ray services, emergency and
preventive health services and out-of-area coverage;
(2) Is compensated, except for copayments,
for the provision of the basic health services to enrolled participants on a
predetermined periodic rate basis; and
(3) Provides physicians' services primarily
through physicians who are either employees or partners of the organization or
through arrangements with individual physicians or one or more groups of
physicians.
(Q) "Health
need" means a situation or a condition of a person, expressed in health outcome
measures such as mortality, morbidity or disability, that is considered
undesirable and is likely to exist in the future.
(R) "Health planning" means data assembly and
analysis, goal determination and the formulation of action recommendations
regarding health services.
(S)
"Health services" means,
clinically related services, that are, diagnostic, treatment, rehabilitation
services, or nursing services provided by a nursing facility. "Health services"
includes alcohol abuse, drug abuse and mental health services.
(T)
"Health services area"
means, a division or geographic area of the State of Maine, determined by the
Department to have geographic logic when analyzing specific nursing facility
projects.
(U)
"Health
status" means patient or population measures, or both, of good and poor
health practices, rates of death and disease, both chronic and infectious, and
the prevalence of symptoms or conditions, or both, of illness and
wellness.
(V)
"Hospital" means an institution that primarily provides to
inpatients, by or under the supervision of physicians, diagnostic services and
therapeutic services for medical diagnosis, treatment and care of injured,
disabled or sick persons or rehabilitation services for the rehabilitation of
injured, disabled or sick persons. "Hospital" also includes psychiatric and
tuberculosis hospitals.
(W)
"Hospital swing bed" means, an acute care bed licensed by the
Bureau of Medical Services, Division of Licensing and Certification for the use
also as a nursing care bed. Swing beds may be established only in rural
hospitals with fewer than 100 licensed acute care beds.
(X)
"Major medical equipment"
means, a single unit of medical equipment or a single system of components with
related functions used to provide medical and other health services and that
costs $1,200,000 or more. This term does not include medical equipment acquired
by or on behalf of a clinical laboratory to provide clinical laboratory
services, if the clinical laboratory is independent of a physician's office and
a hospital and has been determined to meet the requirements of the U.S. Social
Security Act, Title XVIII, Section 1861(s), paragraphs 10 and 11. In
determining whether medical equipment costs more than $1,200,000 the threshold
provided in this subsection, the cost of studies, surveys, designs, plans,
working drawings, specifications and other activities essential to acquiring
the equipment must be included. If the equipment is acquired for less than fair
market value, the term "cost" includes the fair market value. Beginning
September 30, 2004 and annually thereafter, the threshold amount for review
must be updated by the commissioner to reflect the change in the Consumer Price
Index, medical index.
(Y)
"Make available" means, with respect to a registered person
directly affected by a review, one copy of the preliminary staff report shall
be mailed to each such person within 5 business days of its
completion
(Z)
"Modification" means, the alteration, improvement, expansion,
extension, renovation or replacement of a health care facility, including
initial equipment thereof, and the replacement of equipment or existing
buildings.
(AA)
"New Health
Service" means:
(1) The obligation of
any capital expenditures by or on behalf of a health care facility of $110,000
or more that is associated with the addition of a health service that was not
offered on a regular basis by or on behalf of the health care facility within
the 12-month period prior to the time the services would be offered;
(2) The addition of a health service that is
to be offered by or on behalf of a health care facility that was not offered on
a regular basis by or on behalf of the health care facility within the 12-month
period prior to the time the services would be offered is projected to entail
incremental annual operating costs directly attributable to the addition of
that health service of at least $400,000; or
(3) The addition in the private office of a
health care practitioner, as defined in Title 24, section 2502, subsection 1-
A, of a new technology that costs $1,200,000 or more. The Department shall
consult with the Maine Quality Forum Advisory Council established pursuant to
Title 24-A, section 6952, prior to determining whether a project qualifies as a
new technology in the office of a private practitioner. Beginning September 30,
2004 and annually thereafter, the threshold amount for review must be updated
by the commissioner to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index medical
index. With regard to the private office of a health care practitioner, "new
health service" does not include the location of a new practitioner in a
geographic area. "New Health Service does not include a health care facility
that extends a current service within the defined primary service area of the
health care facility by purchasing within a 12-month time period new equipment
costing in the aggregate less than the threshold referred to above.
(BB)
Nursing
facility" means a facility which is operated in connection with a
hospital, or in which nursing care and medical services are prescribed by or
performed under the general direction of persons licensed to practice medicine
or surgery in the State, for the accommodation of convalescent or other persons
who are not acutely ill and not in need of hospital care, but who do require
skilled nursing care and related medical services. The term "nursing home" or
"nursing facility" is restricted to those facilities, the purpose of which is
to provide skilled nursing care and related medical services for a period of
not less than 24 hours per day to individuals admitted because of illness,
disease or physical or mental infirmity and which provides a community service.
Please see
22
M.R.S.A. §1812 A and state licensing
regulations.
(CC)
"Obligation" means, a capital expenditure that is incurred by or
on behalf of a health care facility, as follows:
(1) When a contract, enforceable under Maine
law, is entered into by or on behalf of the health care facility for the
construction, acquisition, lease or financing of a capital asset;
(2) When the governing board of the health
care facility takes formal action to commit its own funds for a construction
project undertaken by the facility as its own contractor; or
(3) In the case of donated property, on the
date on which the gift is completed under applicable Maine
law.
(DD)
"Offer" means, when used in connection with "health service", that
the health care facility or health maintenance organization holds itself out as
capable of providing or having the means to provide a health service.
(EE)
"Person" means, an
individual, trust or estate, partnership, corporation, including associations,
joint stock companies and insurance companies, the State or a political
subdivision or instrumentality of the State including a municipal corporation
of the State, or any other legal entity recognized by state law.
(FF)
"Person directly affected
by a review" includes:
(1) the
applicant;
(2) A group of 10
persons residing or located within the health service area served or to be
served by the applicant;
(3) A
health care facility, a health maintenance organization or a health care
practitioner that demonstrates that it provides similar services or, by timely
filing a letter of intent with the Department for inclusion in the record,
indicates an intention to provide similar services in the future to patients
residing in the health service area and whose services would be directly and
substantially affected by the application under review;
(4) A 3rd-party
payor, including, without limitation, a health maintenance organization, that
pays health care facilities for services in the health service area in which
the project is proposed to be located and whose payments would be directly and
substantially affected by the application under review; and
(5) A person who demonstrates a direct and
substantial effect upon that person's health care as a result of the
application under review..
(GG)
"Pre development activity"
means, any appropriately capitalized expenditure by or on behalf of a health
care facility made in preparation for the offering or development of a new
health service for which a CON would be required and arrangements or
commitments made for financing the offering or development of the new health
service; and shall include site acquisitions, surveys, studies, expenditures
for architectural designs, plans, working drawings and
specifications.
(HH)
"Project" means, any acquisition, capital expenditure, new health
service or change in a health service, pre development activity or other
activity that requires a CON under Title
22 M.R.S.A.,
Section329.
(II)
"Regular basis" means, when
used in conjunction with the definition of a new health service offered on a
routine basis in such a manner as to reasonably accommodate the diagnostic,
treatment or rehabilitation needs of persons on at least a weekly basis and
provided on at least 50% of the normal business days during which the service
is offered within the 12-month period prior to the time the service is intended
to be offered.
(JJ)
"Rehabilitation facility" means an inpatient facility that is
operated for the primary purpose of assisting in the rehabilitation of disabled
persons through an integrated program of medical services and other services
that are provided under competent professional supervision.
(KK) "Replacement equipment "
means a piece of capital equipment that replaces another piece of capital
equipment that performs essentially the same functions as the replaced
equipment.
(LL) "Significant
change in financing " means, changes in the principal amount, interest
rate and term of debt financing, the nature of the payback provisions on debt
financing (e.g. level-debt schedule or level-principal schedule), the amount
and nature of equity contributions, the annual amount and duration of
depreciation expense changes.
(MM)
"State Health Plan" means the plan developed in accordance with
Title 2 M.R.S.A., Chapter 5.
71.03
SCOPE OF CON-COVERED
ACTIVITIES
(A)
Certificate of
Need Required. A person may not enter into any commitment for financing
a project that requires a CON or incur an expenditure for the project without
having sought and received a CON. This prohibition does not apply to
obligations for financing conditioned upon the receipt of a CON or to
obligations for pre development activities. Except as provided in the CON Act
and these rules, a CON is required for:
(1)
Transfer of ownership, acquisition by lease, donation, transfer;
acquisition of control. Any transfer of ownership or acquisition of a
nursing facility under lease, or comparable arrangement or through donation or
any acquisition of control of a health care facility under lease, management
agreement or comparable arrangement or through donation that would have
required review if the transfer or acquisition had been by purchase, except in
emergencies when that acquisition of control is at the direction of the
Department. The commissioner shall issue a CON for a project that involves the
acquisition of control of a health care facility when the acquisition consists
of a management agreement or similar arrangement and primarily involves the
day-to-day operation of the facility in its current form if the commissioner
determines that:
(1) the project meets the
requirements of section 71.05(L) (5), and;
(2) that the project is economically feasible
in light of its impact on the operating budget of the facility and the
applicant and the applicant's ability to operate the facility without increases
in the facility's rates beyond those that would otherwise occur absent the
acquisition;
(2)
Acquisitions of certain major medical equipment. Acquisitions by
or on behalf of a nursing facility of major medical equipment with a cost of
$1,200,000 or more. The use of major medical equipment on a temporary basis in
the case of a natural disaster, major accident or equipment failure and the use
of replacement equipment does not require a CON;
(3)
Capital expenditures. The
obligation by a nursing facility, when related to nursing services provided by
the nursing facility, of any capital expenditure of $510,000, or more Every 2
years, beginning January 1, 2005, the Department shall review the monetary
limit and revise the limit to correspond to changes in the Consumer Price Index
medical index by adopting rules setting the new figures. A CON is not required
for a nursing facility to convert beds used for the provision of nursing
services to beds to be used for the provision of residential care services. If
such a conversion occurs, public funds are not obligated for payment of
services provided in the converted beds;
(4)
New health service. The
offering or development of any new health service. For purposes of this
section, "new health service" includes only the following:
(a) The obligation of any capital
expenditures by or on behalf of a health care facility of $110,000 or more that
is associated with the addition of a health service that was not offered on a
regular basis by or on behalf of the health care facility within the 12-month
period prior to the time the services would be offered; or
(b) The addition of a health service that is
to be offered by or on behalf of a health care facility that was not offered on
a regular basis by or on behalf of the health care facility within the 12-month
period prior to the time the services would be offered and that, for the
3
rd fiscal year of operation, including a partial
first year, following addition of that service, is projected to entail
incremental annual operating costs directly attributable to the addition of a
new health service of at least $400,000.
A CON is not required for a health care facility that extends
a current service within the defined primary service area of the health care
facility by purchasing within a 12-month time period new equipment costing in
the aggregate less than $1,200,000.
(5)
Other
(a) Any increase in the licensed bed
complement of a nursing facility;
(b) Any increase in the licensed bed
complement or bed capacity of a hospital that includes swing beds or licensed
nursing beds;
(c) The construction,
development or other establishment of a new or replacement nursing facility or
the addition by a hospital of nursing facility services;
(d) Acquisitions and transfers.
(e) A new health service not otherwise
subject to review under these rules and not reviewed and approved prior to
commencement of new services will require a CON if its actual
3rd fiscal year operating costs exceed
$400,000.
(f) Any projects that the
Department determines are related projects if such projects, considered in the
aggregate, would otherwise require a CON under this section.
(B)
Exemptions. Except as otherwise specifically provided, nothing in
these rules shall be construed to preempt, replace or otherwise negate the
requirements of any other laws or regulations governing health care facilities.
The requirements of this Act shall not apply with respect to:
(1) A health care facility operated by
religious groups relying solely on spiritual means through prayer for
healing;
(2) Activities or
acquisitions by or on behalf of a health maintenance organization or a health
care facility controlled, directly or indirectly, by a health maintenance
organization or combination of health maintenance organizations to the extent
mandated by the National Health Policy, Planning and Resources Development Act
of 1974, as amended and its accompanying regulations;
(3) Expenditures undertaken in one accounting
period that involve exclusive replacement of equipment and includes no other
expense that in combination with replacement of equipment, would exceed the
threshold.
(4) Conversion of
licensed nursing home beds used for the provision of nursing services to beds
licensed for the provision of residential care services,
(5) Assisted living programs and services
regulated under chapter 1665.
(6)
Conversion of a critical access hospital of acute care beds to hospital swing
beds.
(7) Hospice services and Home
Health Care services offered by a home health care provider.
(C)
Divisions
prohibited. No person shall separate portions of a single project into
components, including, but not limited to, site, facility and equipment, to
evade the cost limitations or other requirements of these rules.
(D)
Time spans specified
(1) No person required to obtain a CON shall
split what should properly be considered a single capital expenditure into
discrete components undertaken during more than one accounting period
(generally one fiscal year) to evade the cost thresholds of the program. In
determining whether a particular project involves a capital expenditure
requiring a CON, the Department will take into consideration the aggregate cost
of any future components of such project that are proposed to be undertaken
during a thirty-six (36) month period beginning on the date the obligation for
the first such component is incurred.
(2) In determining whether a proposal
involves licensed bed capacity changes requiring a CON, the Department will
take into separate consideration increases, decreases, redistribution and
relocations occurring over two-year periods subsequent to the effective date of
the program.
(E)
Subsequent Review. After a CON has been issued, changes occurring
in an approved project may require subsequent review. A subsequent review is
required if any of the following changes occur within three years after the
approved activity is commenced:
(1) There is
a significant change in operating or capital financing;
(2) There is a change affecting the licensed
or certified bed capacity as approved in the CON (except if nursing facility
beds are converted to residential care beds);
(3) There is a change involving the addition
or termination of the health services proposed to be rendered by the health
care facility;
(4) There is a
change in the site or the location of the proposed health care facility;
or
(5) There is a substantial
change proposed in the design of the health care facility or the type of
construction.
(F)
Procedures for subsequent review
(1) The holder of an approved CON is
responsible for notifying the Department in writing within 30 days of
determining that circumstances exist that require subsequent review. The
written notice shall set forth the following information:
(a) The nature of the proposed
change;
(b) The need for the change
including, where appropriate, an explanation of why the change was not set
forth in the original application or letter of intent; and
(c) Other pertinent details subject to the
procedures and criteria set forth in these rules.
(2) Within 30 days of receipt of this written
notice, the Department shall:
(a) advise the
holder of an approved CON in writing whether the proposed change is approved,
or
(b) if not approved, the
application must be treated as a new application under the CON Act..
(c) If approved, the department shall amend
the CON as appropriate.
(3) Any proposal for subsequent review that
would be reviewable under applicable sections of these rules if it were not an
amendment to an existing CON, may be given a full review in accordance with
applicable review procedures.
(G)
Review following approval.
When the commissioner approves an application unconditionally or subject to
conditions pursuant to the CON Act, the commissioner may conduct a review to
ensure compliance with any terms or conditions of the approval within 3 years
after the approved activity is undertaken. In this review, the commissioner may
hold a public hearing and may consider any significant changes in factors or
circumstances relied upon by the commissioner in approving the application and
significant and relevant information that either is new or was withheld by the
applicant at the time of the process under the CON Act. If, upon review, the
commissioner determines that any terms or conditions of the approval have not
been met, the commissioner may take enforcement action consistent with the CON
Act.
71.05
APPLICATION PROCESS
(A)
Letter of Intent
(1) Prior to filing an application for a CON,
an applicant shall file a Letter of Intent (LOI) with the
Department. The LOI shall form the basis for determining whether the proposed
expenditure or action is subject to CON review. It will expire in 12 months of
receipt unless an application is received by the Department within that time
period. The applicant is not precluded from resubmitting the same letter of
intent.
(2)
The LOI must
contain the following information in sufficient detail to allow the
Department to determine whether the expenditure or action is subject to review:
(a) A request for a ruling regarding the
applicability of CON to the proposal;
(b) A brief description, including location,
of the proposed project. The project should, to the extent practicable, be
described in terms which permit comparison to the scope of CON contained in
Section 71.03;
(c) An estimate of
any capital expenditure or annual operating cost of the proposed project, and
anticipated utilization;
(d)
Anticipated date on which management services will commence, or an obligation
for any proposed capital expenditure is to be incurred, nature of obligation
and amount;
(e) Anticipated date of
submission of an application if one is required;
(f) Anticipated date of commencement of the
proposed project (e.g. initiation of construction, acquisition of equipment);
and
(g) Anticipated date of
completion of the proposed project or date on which services will first be
offered to the public.
(3)
Response by Department
(a) After receiving the letter of intent, the
Department shall notify the applicant whether the proposed project is subject
to review or advise that additional information is needed before making a
determination. If the Department determines that the proposed project is
subject to review, the Department shall issue a letter or checklist, or both,
to an applicant that stipulates and clarifies what will be required in the
application.
(b) Within 30 days of
filing the letter of intent, the applicant may meet with the Department staff
in order to assist the Department in understanding the application and to
receive technical assistance concerning the nature, extent and format of the
documentary evidence, statistical data and financial data required for the
Department to evaluate the proposal.
(i)
Waive technical assistance meeting. After December 31, 2011, the
technical assistance meeting requirement may be waived by the applicant. The
Letter of Intent must state that the applicant waives the technical assistance
meeting. See Public Law 2011, Chapter 424, Sec. C-1.
(c) After receiving notice from the
Department that a CON is required for a proposed expenditure or action, if the
applicant wishes to proceed with the project, the applicant must file an
application for a certificate of need.
(4)
Non-applicability
determination. A determination by the Department that a CON is not
needed for a proposal is considered a "non-applicability determination" and
permits the person to proceed with the proposed project without risk of having
sanctions or other penalties imposed. However, if the Department receives new
information indicating that a non-applicability determination was based on
partial or inaccurate facts, the determination may be rescinded and a new
applicability determination will be made.
(B)
Filing of an Application
(1) A non-refundable filing fee must be paid
at the time the application is filed. Fees are determined as follows:
(a) Fees shall be computed at $1,000 per
$1,000,000, or part thereof, of the proposed capital expenditure or third year
operating costs, whichever is higher.
(b) The minimum fee is $1,000.
(c) If the approved capital expenditure or
operating costs on which the fees were based are higher than the initially
proposed capital expenditure, the difference in fees, if any, must be paid
before the CON can be issued.
(d)
Applications for which review is suspended for more than six months shall be
assessed a filing fee equal to that of a new application when review is
reactivated.
(2) The
application must describe with specificity how the proposed project meets each
of the conditions for granting a certificate of need required by this chapter.
A statement or statements that the project will meet the conditions without
supporting facts backed by relevant documentation and analysis constitute
sufficient cause to deny the application. Information may include, but is not
limited to the disclosure of identities of interested and related parties, a
list of facilities in which the applicant, either directly or indirectly, has
ownership or management interests, statements of deficiencies and plans of
correction from licensing/certification activities, financial statements and
financial projections, etc. An application subject to full review must contain,
if available and relevant to the particular service or technology, information
on health status, characteristics of the payor mix for the population to be
served, public health need for the service or technology, quality assurance
processes and prevention programs.
(3) The application shall be in the format
specified in the Department's Comprehensive Application Format, unless an
alternative format is agreed to at the technical assistance meeting.
(a)
Waive technical assistance
meeting. After December 31, 2011, the technical assistance meeting
requirement may be waived by the applicant. The Letter of Intent must state
that the applicant waives the technical assistance meeting. See Public Law
2011, Chapter 424, Sec. C-1.
(4) The applicant shall provide two copies of
a summary of all actions taken by the Department to enforce regulations or
improve quality of care, including the implementation or completion of adverse
actions according to the Federal State Operations Manual necessary to enforce
Conditions/Standards of Participation, and all civil or criminal actions
(identifying where possible the name, court, docket number, and outcome for
each case) pending or decided against any such facility or service within the
most recent three-year period.
(5)
An application is certified as complete when the applicant delivers to the
Department a certification in writing that states that the application should
be considered complete by the Department. Subsequent to the applicant's
certification under this subsection, the applicant may submit information that
is responsive to any concern, issue, question or allegation of facts contrary
to those in the application made by the Department or another person.
(6) Within 5 business days of the filing of a
certificate by an applicant that a complete certificate of need application is
on file with the Department, the applicant shall publish, at its' expense, a
public notice prepared by the Department, that the application has been filed
and that a public informational meeting must be held regarding the application.
Such notice must be given by publication in a newspaper of general circulation
in Kennebec County and in a newspaper published within the service area in
which the proposed expenditure will occur. This notice must also be provided to
all persons who have requested notification by means of asking that their names
be placed on a mailing list maintained by the Department for this purpose. This
notice must include:
(a) A brief description
of the proposed expenditure or other action;
(b) A description of the review process and
schedule;
(c) A statement that any
person may examine the application, submit comments in writing to the
Department regarding the application and examine the entire record assembled by
the Department at any time from the date of publication of the notice until the
application process is closed for comment; and
(d) The time and location of the public
informational meeting and a statement that any person may appear at the meeting
to question the applicant regarding the project or the Department regarding the
conditions that the applicant must satisfy in order to receive a CON for the
project.
The Department shall make an electronic or stenographic
record of the public informational meeting.
(7) During the review period, prior to the
date that Department staff submits a final report to the commissioner, an
applicant may withdraw an application without prejudice by filing written
notice of the withdrawal with the Department. A withdrawn application may be
resubmitted and will be processed as an entirely new application under this
chapter.
(C)
Competitive reviews. In cases of competitive reviews, applicants
shall submit additional information within 30 business days or within a longer
period of time, provided that the Department and all competing applicants
agree.
(D)
Automatic
withdrawal. Any incomplete application is considered withdrawn if the
applicant fails to respond to a request for additional required information
within 180 days of the date the request was forwarded by the
Department.
(E) Consultation on new
technologies and needs. In connection with the development of policies and
procedures to implement this Act, the commissioner may, from time to time,
consult with persons with relevant skills and experience regarding new medical
technologies and the impact of those technologies on the health care delivery
system in the State; and the unmet need for health care services in the
State.
(F)
Review
Process. The review process consists of an evaluation of the project
application for a CON by the Department in light of the application itself,
material collected or developed by or for the Department staff to test the
assertions in the application, all comments received by any person regarding
the project and any other material made part of the record.
(G)
Public Hearings. The
following provisions apply to a public hearing under this chapter:
(1) The commissioner or the commissioner's
designee may hold a public hearing regarding the application.
(2) The commissioner, or the commissioner's
designee, shall hold a public hearing if 5 persons residing located within the
health service area to be served by the applicant request, in writing, that
such a public hearing be held and the request is received by the commissioner
no later than 30 days following the informational hearing on the application
conducted pursuant to section 71.05(B) (6). The public hearing shall be noticed
publicly and held within 20 business days of the receipt of the request, unless
a longer timeframe is agreed to by the applicant, the persons requesting the
public hearing and the Department.
(3) The public hearing shall be conducted in
a geographic location reasonably close to the location of the intended project.
The public hearing will be an opportunity for the Department, any person
directly affected by a review and the public to receive information relative to
the application. The applicant, any other person directly affected by a review
and the public will be permitted to introduce verbal or written testimony
and/or evidence. Witnesses will not be sworn. The commissioner's designee may,
at its sole discretion, prepare an agenda for a public hearing that includes
reasonable limits on the amount of time allotted for the presentation of verbal
testimony and/or evidence.
(4) An
electronic or stenographic record of the public hearing must be made part of
the record.
(5) The Department will
accept written comments regarding the application for 10 days after the close
of the public hearing.
(H)
Preliminary staff analyses.
As soon as practicable, the Department staff shall provide the preliminary
analyses of the application and the record to the applicant, the commissioner
and any person who requests the analyses and record. Notice of the availability
of the analyses must be published in a newspaper in general circulation serving
the area in which the project is to be located and on the department's publicly
accessible site on the Internet. Such notice will be at the applicant's
expense. Ten days after the notice is published in the newspaper the public
record will be closed.
(I)
Final department staff analysis. A final Department staff analysis
must be submitted to the commissioner, together with the documentary record
described in section 71.05(H) (5), as soon as practicable after the closing of
the record.
(J)
Reviews. To the extent practicable, a review must be completed and
the commissioner shall make a decision within 90 days after the application has
been certified as complete by the applicant. The Department shall determine
when it is not practicable to complete a review within 90 days according to the
criteria described in section 71.05(L). Whenever it is not practicable to
complete a review within 90 days, the Department may extend the review period
for up to an additional 60 days.
(K)
Public necessity. The
Department may delay action on an otherwise complete application for up to 180
days from the time the application has been certified as complete by the
applicant if the Department finds that a public necessity exists. The
Department shall provide written notice of the delay to the applicant and any
other person who has requested in writing information regarding the
application. For purposes of this subsection, the Department shall find that a
public necessity exists if:
(1) The
application represents a new service or technology not previously provided
within the State.
(2) The
application represents a potential significant impact on health care system
costs.
(3) The application
represents a new service or technology for which a health care system need has
not been previously established.
(4) There are several applications for the
same or similar projects before the Department.
(L)
Types of Review
(1) The Department may conduct any of the
following types of reviews:
(a) A simplified
review.
(b) A full
review.
(c) An extended
review.
(2) A simplified
review will be accorded those projects which:
(a) Meet an already demonstrated need as
established by applicable state health plans or as determined by rules of the
Department; or
(b) Are required
solely to meet federal, state or local life safety codes if the project
involves a health facility, major medical equipment or a new health service
that has previously received a CON.
(c) The Department shall waive the
requirements of an extended review or a full review and conduct a simplified
review process in accordance with this section for an acquisition of control of
health care facilities pursuant to Section 71.03(A)(1) if the acquisition
consists of a management agreement or similar arrangement and primarily
involves the day-to-day operation of the facility in its current
form.
(d) The project primarily
involves the maintenance of a health facility if the commissioner determines
that the project will result in no or a minimal additional expense to the
public or to the health care facility's clients; will be in compliance with
other applicable state and local laws and regulations; and will significantly
improve or, in the alternative, not significantly adversely affect the health
and welfare of any person currently being served by the health care
facility.
(e) The capital
expenditure is required to eliminate or prevent imminent safety hazards, as
defined by applicable fire, building or life safety codes and regulations; to
comply with state licensure standards; or to comply with accreditation or
certification standards that must be met to receive reimbursements under the
United States Social Security Act, Title XVIII or payments under a state plan
for medical assistance approved under Title XIX of that Act.
(f) The economic feasibility of the project
is demonstrated in terms of its effects on the operating budget of the
applicant, including its existing rate structure.
(g) There remains a public need for the
service to be provided.
(h) The
corrective action proposed by the applicant is the most cost effective
alternative available under the circumstances.
(i) Are determined by the Department to
warrant such a review.
(3) An extended review will be utilized
whenever it is not practicable to complete a review within 90 days. Whenever
possible, the decision to utilize an extended review period will be made when
the application is declared complete. The following are types of projects for
which it is not practicable to complete a review within 90 days:
(a) Construction projects involving capital
expenditures in excess of five million dollars;
(b) Proposed new health services not
previously offered or issued CON's in the State;
(c) Competing applications; or
(d) Proposals involving the construction,
addition or replacement of more than 120 nursing facility beds.
(4) The Department will accept no
application for any type of new nursing facility beds unless there has been a
specific appropriation for new beds from the legislature. In the event of such
an appropriation, this section establishes the procedures for review of
applications. To the extent that a procedure is not fully covered by this
section, reference is made to other applicable provisions of these rules.
(a)
Priority areas. The
Department will provide data on the need for new nursing facility beds in each
health service area. Beds will be allocated to one or more of these priority
areas. The Department will publish a notice in the Kennebec Journal and a
newspaper in general circulation in the health service areas of highest
priority. The notice will announce that the Department is requesting competing
proposals, and establish dates by which letters of intent applications must be
received by the Department.
(b)
Review of applications. Reviews will be conducted consistent with
established procedures governing review of competing applications or
non-competing applications, as appropriate.
(c) This section does not apply to
applications for transfer of ownership of existing nursing facilities,
renovation and/or modification of existing nursing facilities without adding
new beds, or replacement of existing (currently licensed and operating)
deficient nursing facility beds.
(d) Nursing facility projects that propose to
add new nursing facility beds to the inventory of nursing facility beds within
the State may be grouped for competitive review purposes consistent with
appropriations made available for that purpose by the Legislature.
(5)
Replacement
beds/facility. Nursing facility beds that are not in service (not
currently licensed) cannot be replaced without a new appropriation unless a
purchase and sale agreement transferring rights to replace the beds was entered
into prior to the expiration of the license.
(6)
Bed banking. A nursing
facility that voluntarily reduces the number of licensed beds may convert the
beds back (relicense the beds) and increase the number of nursing facility beds
to no more than the previously licensed number of nursing facility beds
pursuant to this subsection if the following conditions are met:
(a) The reduction in licensed beds did not
create additional private rooms in the facility;
(b) The facility has been in continuous
operation;
(c) The facility has not
been purchased or leased;
(d) The
facility provided notice of its intent to preserve conversion options to the
Department no later than 30 days after the effective date of license
reduction;
(e) The application is
received by the Department within four (4) years of the effective date of the
license reduction or within eight (8) years if the Department has provided a
one-time four (4) year extension for good cause; and
(f) The facility has obtained a CON. If no
new construction is required for the conversion of banked beds, the application
will be given an expedited review pursuant to Section 71.05(L)(8).
(g) The annual total of reopened beds
approved by the Department does not exceed 100.
(7)
Effect of banked beds on other
review proceedings. Nursing facility beds that have been banked under
Section 71.05(L)(6) are considered as available nursing facility beds for
purposes of evaluating need under Section 71.05(N) so long as the facility
retains the ability to convert them back to nursing facility use, unless the
facility indicates, in response to an inquiry from the Department in connection
with an ongoing project review, that it is unwilling to convert them to meet a
need identified in that project review.
(8)
Expedited review. A request
to convert banked beds where no construction is required to do so will be
provided an expedited review. The scope of review under this section will
consist of the following:
(a) Review of the
historical costs of operating the beds to determine whether the projected costs
are consistent with the cost of operating the beds prior to closure, adjusted
for inflation and case mix;
(b) The
application must meet the requirements of Section 71.05(N)(1) except that
subsection (b) of that section shall be based on (a), above.
(9)
Extensions of review
period. Any review period may be extended with the written consent of
the applicant. The request to extend the review period may be initiated by the
applicant or the Department. If the request is initiated by the Department, it
shall not be effective unless consented to by the applicant in writing. If the
applicant initiates the request, the Department shall agree to the requested
extension if it determines that the request is for good cause.
(10)
Mailing list of persons who have
requested notification of the beginning of a review. The Department
shall provide notice to all persons who have requested notification by means of
asking that their names be placed on a mailing list maintained by the
Department for this purpose. The Department will provide notice of the
beginning of a review for all types of projects for which notification is
requested.
(M)
Approval; Record. This section applies to determinations by the
commissioner under this chapter.
(1)
Basis for decision. Based solely on a review of the record
maintained under 71.05 (M)(6), the commissioner shall approve an application
for a CON if the commissioner determines that the project meets the conditions
set forth in section N.
(2)
Communications. Except as otherwise provided in the CON Act, only
a person who is a full-time employee of the department with responsibilities
for the CON program, a consultant to the project or a policy expert pursuant to
section 71.05(E) may communicate with the commissioner regarding any
application for a CON or any letter of intent. Nothing in this section limits
the authority or obligation of the staff of the Department with responsibility
for the certificate of need program to meet with, or otherwise communicate
with, any person who is not a Department employee and who wants to provide
information to be considered in connection with an application for a
CON.
(3)
Limited
communications. A person who is not a Department employee may not
communicate with any Department staff regarding the merits of a certificate of
need application except for the purpose of placing that person's views in the
application record. All communications with Department staff responsible for
the certificate of need program from any person who is not a Department
employee that the Department staff reasonably believes is intended to influence
the analyses relating to or the decision regarding any application for CON must
be noted by that Department staff and that notation must be made part of the
application record.
(4)
Decision. The commissioner's decision must be in writing and must
contain appropriate references to the record. If the application is denied, the
decision must specifically address comments received and made part of the
record that favor granting the application. If the application is approved, the
decision must specifically address comments received and made part of the
record that favor denial of the application.
(5)
Record. The record created
by the Department in the course of its review of an application must contain:
a) The application and all other materials
submitted by the applicant for the purpose of being made part of the
record.
b) All information generated
by or for the Department in the course of gathering material to assist the
commissioner in determining whether the conditions for granting an application
for a CON have or have not been met. This information may include, without
limitation, the report of consultants, memoranda of meeting or conversations
with any persons interested in commenting on the applications, letters,
memoranda and documents from other interested agencies of State Government and
memoranda describing officially noticed facts.
c) Stenographic or electronic recordings of
any public hearing held by the commissioner or the staff of the Department at
the direction of the commissioner regarding the application.
d) Stenographic or electronic recording of
any public informational meeting held by the Department.
e) Any documents submitted by any person for
the purpose of being made part of the record regarding any application for a
CON or for the purpose of influencing the outcome of any analyses or decisions
regarding an application for CON, except documents that have been submitted
anonymously. Such source-identified documents automatically become part of the
record upon receipt by the department and
f) Preliminary and final analyses of the
record prepared by the staff and
g)
Written assessments by the Director of the Bureau of Health and the
Superintendent of Insurance assessing the impact of the application on the
health care system or cost of health insurance in the
State.
(6)
Maintenance of the record. The record created pursuant to Section
71.05(M)(5) first opens on the day the Department publishes its notice that an
application for a CON has been filed. From that day, all of the record is a
public record, and any person may examine that record and purchase copies of
any or all of that record during the normal business hours of the Department.
The record is closed 10 days after a public notice of the closing of the record
has been published in a newspaper of general circulation in Kennebec County, in
a newspaper published within the service area of the project and on the
department's publicly accessible site on the Internet, as long as the notice is
not published until after the preliminary staff analysis of the application is
made part of the record.
(N)
Principles Governing Review
(1)
Determinations required. A
CON shall be issued whenever the commissioner determines and makes specific
written findings regarding that determination that;
(a) The applicant is fit, willing and able to
provide services at the proper standard of care as demonstrated by, among other
factors, whether the quality of any health care provided in the past by the
applicant or a related party under the applicant's control meets industry
standards;
(b) The economic
feasibility of the proposed services is demonstrated in terms of the capacity
of the applicant to support the project financially over its useful life, in
light of the rates the applicant expect to be able to charge for the services
to be provided by the project; and the applicants ability to establish and
operate the project in accordance with existing and reasonably anticipated
future changes in federal, state and local licensure and other applicable or
potentially applicable rules;
(c)
There is a public need for the proposed services as demonstrated by the extent
to which the project will substantially address specific health problems as
measured by health needs in the area to be served by the project, whether the
project will have a positive impact on the health status indicators of the
population to be served, whether the services affected by the project will be
accessible to all residents of the area proposed to be served, and whether the
project will provide demonstrable improvements in quality and outcome measures
applicable to the services proposed in the project.
(d) The proposed services are consistent with
the orderly and economic development of health facilities and health resources
for the state in accordance with the State Health Plan, that the impact of the
project on total health care expenditures after taking into account, to the
extent practical, both the cost and benefits of the project and the competing
demands in the local service area and statewide for available resources for
health care, that state funds are available to cover any increase in state
costs associated with the utilization of the project's services and the
likelihood that more effective, more accessible or less costly alternative
technologies or methods of service delivery may become available. In making a
determination under this subsection, the commissioner shall use data available
in the state health plan under Title 2, M.R.S.A., section 103, data from the
Maine Health Data Organization established in Title 22 M.R.S.A., chapter 1683
and other information available to the commissioner. Particular weight must be
given to information that indicates that the proposed health services are
innovations in high quality health care delivery, that the proposed health
services are not reasonably available in the proposed area and that the
facility proposing the new health services is designed to provide excellent
quality health care.
(e) The
project is consistent with the State Health Plan.
(f) The project ensures high-quality outcomes
and does not negatively affect the quality of care delivered by existing
service providers.
(g) The project
does not result in inappropriate increases in service utilization according to
the principles of evidence-based medicine adopted by the Maine quality Forum,
as established in Title
24-A M.R.S.A.,
section6951.
(2)
Conditional approvals. The
commissioner may grant an application subject to conditions that relate to the
criteria for approval of the application.
(3)
Criteria. In determining
whether to issue or deny a CON, the Department shall, among other criteria,
consider the following:
(a) Whether the
project will substantially address specific problems or unmet needs in the area
to be served by the project;
(b)
Whether the project will have a positive impact on the health status indicators
of the population to be served;
(c)
Whether the services affected by the project will be accessible to all
residents of the area proposed to be served. Accessibility is determined
through analysis of the area including population, topography and availability
of transportation and health services;
(d) Whether there are less costly or more
effective alternate methods of reasonably meeting identified health service
needs of the project;
(e) Whether
the project is financially feasible in both an intermediate and long-term time
frame;
(f) Whether the project
would produce a cost benefit in the existing health care system of the State
and the area in which the project is proposed;
(g) Whether the quality of any health care
provided by the applicant in the past meets industry standards;
(h) Whether the project will provide
demonstrable improvements in quality and outcome measures applicable to the
services proposed in the project;
(i) The immediate and long-term financial and
economic feasibility of the proposal, as well as the probable effect of the
proposal on the costs of and charges and net patient revenues for providing
health services by the person proposing the project;
(j) The effect of the means proposed for the
delivery of health services on the clinical needs of health professional
training programs in the area in which the services are to be provided and, if
applicable, the extent to which the health profession schools, if any, in the
area will have access to the services for training purposes;
(k) The probable impact of the proposal being
reviewed on the costs of providing health services by the person proposing the
construction project and on the costs and charges to the public of providing
health services by other persons;
(l) The special circumstances of health care
facilities with respect to conserving energy;
(m) The effect of competition on the supply
of the health service being reviewed and the system wide cost of health care;
provided, however, that this provision shall not be interpreted to mean that
the Department is obligated to approve a project to increase competition where
such increased competition is likely to increase system-wide health care
costs;
(n) In the case of health
services or facilities proposed to be provided, the efficiency, appropriateness
and cost-effectiveness of the use of existing services and facilities similar
to those proposed;
(o) In the case
of health services or facilities, the quality of care provided by those
facilities in the past.
(p) Any
information submitted by the applicant or developed by the Department as well
as any other pertinent information concerning the fitness, willingness, or
ability of the applicant to provide the proposed services at the proper
standard of care.
(4)
Standards applied in CON. In addition to the criteria in (3)
above, standards applicable to projects reviewed by the Department may include
but are not limited to:
(a)
Functional
area space requirements. Gross square footage shall not exceed 500 per
licensed NF bed without justification of need.
(b)
Land and land improvements.
Only the minimum amount of land necessary to satisfy local requirements, if
applicable, or to situate the building and provide adequate parking will be
allowed. The applicant shall provide comparative cost information to support
the cost of land and land improvements to determine whether the cost is
reasonable and necessary.
(c)
Fees for architectural and engineering services. Any design fees
that exceed the State of Maine Recommended Fee Schedule for Design of Public
Improvements (current edition) shall be accompanied by justification by the
applicant and determined necessary by the Department in order to be
approved.
(d)
Contingency
fees. Contingency fees shall not exceed 5% of the construction budget.
Each approved CON is automatically granted 5% leeway on the total construction
cost up to a maximum of $200,000. Therefore, the contingency fee included as
part of the approved construction budget shall be kept to a minimum.
(e)
Developer fees. Developer
fees will not be allowed. Applicants must detail actual costs of the applicant
for the design and implementation of the construction project.
(f)
Moveable equipment. Moveable
equipment, excluding computers, printers and networking, shall not exceed
$5,000/bed.
(g)
Computer
systems. The applicant shall provide a detailed description of the
computer system to be installed and its functionality. Functionality must
justify the cost, and the applicant shall provide comparative bidding
information for technology services.
(h)
Construction cost per square
foot. The calculation of construction costs shall include land and land
development costs, architect/engineering fees, construction supervision,
construction, other design/consultant costs related to construction, insurance
during construction, municipal permits and interest during construction.
Construction costs per square foot shall be compared against Marshall and Swift
Valuation Services (calculator and segregated cost methods) to determine
reasonableness.
(i)
Bed
need. Statistical bed need will be based upon no more than 110
beds/1,000 persons over the age of 75 in the most current census. The
Department will utilize the Maine Hospital Analysis Areas contained in Maine
Health 1998, or as amended, to determine geographic need.
(j)
Nursing hours. Nursing hours
shall be comparable to the hours for similar facilities with respect to size
and case mix. The department will utilize the most current audited data for the
year in which over 50% of the nursing homes have audits on file. This data is
available upon request through the Department's Bureau of Medical
Services.
(O)
Scope of Certificates Issued
(1)
Application determinative. A CON shall be valid only for the
defined scope; premises and facility or person named in the application and
shall not be transferable or assignable.
(2)
Maximum expenditure. In
issuing a CON, the Department shall specify the maximum capital expenditures,
which may be obligated under the certificate. The maximum capital expenditure
for any project involving a capital expenditure shall be (1) a the amount
approved by the Department plus (2) 5% of the approved amount, not to exceed a
maximum of $200,000.
(3)
Procedure for monitoring capital expenditures. Each holder of a
CON is required to make a written report at the end of each 6-month period
following its issuance regarding implementation activities, obligations
incurred, expenditures made and other matters, pursuant to Section
71.05(R).
(4)
Excess capital
expenditures. In the event the Department determines that the holder of
a CON has exceeded the prescribed capital expenditure maximum or is expected to
do so, it shall notify the holder. The following procedures will be followed:
(a) If the holder confirms that it either has
or is likely to exceed the capital expenditure maximum, it shall submit a
written report detailing the amount of and reason for the cost overrun and such
other information as the Department may prescribe, within ten (10) days of
receipt of notice. If the holder denies that the capital expenditure maximum is
likely to be exceeded, the Department may, at its discretion, conduct an audit
of the holder's records. If an audit conducted by or on behalf of the
Department reveals that the holder either has or is likely to exceed the
capital expenditure maximum, the holder shall provide written explanation of
the overrun within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice. Nothing in this
section will prohibit any holder of a CON from voluntarily disclosing that it
either has or is likely to exceed the maximum capital expenditure as soon as
practicable after it becomes known. The holder shall explain in writing the
amount of and reason for the cost overrun and such other information as the
Department may prescribe.
(b) Once
the Department receives written confirmation and explanation of the cost
overrun, the Department shall, within 30 days of receipt of the report and
related information, make a written determination of whether the additional
costs are approved. In making this determination, the Department will
determine, among other factors, that the project remains economically feasible
and that the additional cost is necessary and reasonable.
(c) If the cost overrun is not approved, the
holder shall submit a new application for CON, except that no letter of intent
shall be required. Failure of the holder to submit such an application shall
result in the Department applying applicable penalties under Section 71.04.
(d) Notwithstanding any of the
previous subsections, no holder of a CON is entitled, without prior approval as
specified herein, to spend in excess of the capital expenditure maximum. When
the expenditure maximum is reached, the holder is required to cease incurring
obligations for further expenditures until the Department has finally acted
upon the proposed cost overrun.
(5)
Periodic review. After the
issuance of a CON, the Department shall periodically review the progress of the
holder in meeting the timetable for making the service or equipment available
or for completing the project as specified in the approved application. A CON
shall expire if the project for which it was issued is not commenced within 12
months following its issuance. The Department may grant an extension for an
additional specified time not to exceed 12 months if good cause is shown why
the project was not commenced. The Department may require evidence of the
continuing feasibility and availability of financing for a project as a
condition for extending the life of the certificate. In addition, if on the
basis of its periodic review of progress under the certificate, the Department
determines that the holder is not otherwise meeting the timetable and is not
making a good faith effort to meet it, the Department may, after a hearing,
withdraw the CON. The applicant shall issue to the department periodic reports
as designated in the certificate of need approval notification on the impact of
the service on the health status, quality of care and health outcomes of the
population served and the characteristics of the payor mix for the population
served. These reports may not be in less than 12-month intervals following the
start of service approved in the CON.
(a)
Requests for extension of a CON shall be made in writing to the Department no
later than 30 days prior to the expiration of the original CON or extended
period, whichever is applicable. The request shall state the reason why the
project could not be implemented during the original implementation period,
what steps have been taken to assure that the project can be implemented during
the extension period and the length of the extension necessary to complete the
implementation. The initial extension period will be limited to no more than
six months in duration.
(b) If a
CON and any extension expire prior to commencement of an approved project, a
new CON application is required. No new letter of intent will be
required.
(c) In the event a holder
of a CON is litigating a complaint relative to the issuance of said
certificate, then the project shall be deemed to have commenced subject to the
following.
(d)
Procedures for
withdrawing a CON by the Department
(i) If a holder of a certificate is not
meeting the timetable for completion of the project and it appears to the
Department that the holder may not be making a good faith effort to meet it,
the holder shall show cause why the certificate should not be
withdrawn.
(ii) The Department
shall notify a holder in any case in which noncompliance with the timetable is
suspected. The holder shall thereafter have 10 business days in which to file a
detailed written response stating precisely how the project stands with respect
to the timetable and, if the project may be behind schedule, stating with
specificity all facts bearing on whether the holder is making a good faith
effort to meet the timetable. All documents supporting the holder's response
shall be appended to such response.
(iii) If, after reviewing the holder's
response, it appears that the holder may not be in compliance, the Department
may conduct a hearing to determine compliance. The hearing shall be conducted
in accordance with Chapter 375, subchapter IV of the Maine Administrative
Procedures Act. It shall be the burden of the holder in any such proceeding to
demonstrate compliance with the timetable or good faith efforts to meet the
timetable.
(iv) The Department may,
if circumstances warrant, proceed directly to a hearing under subsection (iii)
above without making the inquiry specified in subsection (ii).
(P)
Departmental Reconsideration
(1)
Cause to be shown. Any person directly affected by a review may,
for good cause shown, request in writing a hearing for the purposes of
reconsideration of the decision of the Department to issue or deny a CON. If
good cause has been demonstrated, the Department shall hold a hearing to
reconsider its decision. To be effective, a request for a hearing shall be
received by the Department within 30 days of the Department's decision. If the
Department determines that good cause for a hearing has been demonstrated, the
hearing shall commence within 30 days of receipt of the request. A decision
shall be rendered within 60 days of the commencement of the hearing. The
decision may be rendered beyond this time period by mutual consent of the
parties. For purposes of this section, and in accordance with
22 M.R.S.A.
Section340, a request for a hearing shall be
deemed to have shown good cause if it:
(a)
Presents significant, relevant information not previously considered by the
Department which, with reasonable diligence, could not have been presented
before the Department made its decision; or
(b) Demonstrates that there have been
significant changes in factors or circumstances relied upon by the Department
in reaching its decision; or
(c)
Demonstrates that the Department has materially failed to follow its adopted
procedures in reaching its decision; or
(d) Provides other bases for a hearing that
the Department has determined constitutes good cause.
(2)
Conduct of hearing. The
hearing shall be conducted in accordance with Chapter 375, subchapter IV of the
Administrative Procedures Act. The scope of the hearing shall be limited to the
issue(s) that the Department determines constitute god cause for the purpose of
commencing the hearing. After the close of the hearing, the hearing officer
shall promptly forward the hearing record to the commissioner for the
commissioner's consideration in rendering a decision.
(3)
Petition for
reconsideration. A person requesting a hearing for reconsideration must
submit all material relevant to the determination of whether a hearing should
be held, including any supporting documentation, in a single, all inclusive,
petition within 30 days of the Department's decision. Material received after
the receipt of the single petition will not be considered in determining
whether to hold a hearing.
(Q)
Judicial Review
(1) Any person aggrieved by a final decision
of the Department made under the CON Act shall be entitled to a review in
accordance with the Maine Administrative Procedure Act. A decision of the
Department to issue a CON or to deny an application for a CON shall not be
considered final until the Department has taken final action on a request for
reconsideration on Section 71.05(P).
(2) In judicial review involving competitive
reviews of proposals to construct new nursing facility beds, the court shall
require the party seeking judicial review to give security in such sums as the
court determines proper, for the payment of costs and damages that may be
incurred or suffered by any other party who is found to have been wrongfully
delayed or restrained from proceeding to implement the CON, except that for
good cause shown and recited in the order, the court may waive the giving of
security. A surety upon a bond or undertaking under this section submits the
surety to the jurisdiction of the court and irrevocably appoints the clerk of
the court as the agent for the surety upon whom any papers affecting liability
on the bond or undertaking may be served. The liability of the surety may be
enforced on motion without the necessity of an independent action. The motion
and such notice of the motion as the court prescribes may be served on the
clerk of the court who shall mail copies to the persons giving the security if
their addresses are known.
(R)
Implementation Reports
(1)
Implementation reports
required. A summary report shall be made when the service or services
for which the CON was issued becomes operational. Periodic reports shall be
filed at the end of each 6-month period following the issuance of a CON
regarding implementation activities, obligations incurred, and expenditures
made. For a period of one year following the implementation of the service or
services for which the CON was granted, the provider shall file, at 6-month
intervals, reports concerning the costs and utilization. Report forms will be
provided by the Department.
(2)
Final plans and specifications submission required. Any holder of
a CON which has been issued for the construction or modification of a facility
or portion thereof shall file final plans and specifications therefore with the
Department within 6 months, or any other time that the Department may allow,
following the issuance of the certificate for review by the Department to
determine that the plans and specifications are in compliance with applicable
licensure, life safety code and accreditation standards.
(3)
Penalty. The Department may
revoke any CON it has issued when the person to whom it has been issued fails
to file on a timely basis, reports, plans or specifications required by this
section. The department shall review services that fall below the required
volume and quality standards of a CON.
(S)
Other Provisions
(1)
Emergency Reviews
(a) Upon the written or oral request of an
applicant asserting that an emergency situation exists, the Department shall
immediately determine whether an emergency situation exists and upon finding
that an emergency situation does exist shall issue a CON for a project
necessary on account of the emergency situation. The scope of the CON may not
exceed that which is necessary to remedy or otherwise effectively address the
emergency situation. The CON may be subject to conditions consistent with the
purpose of this Act that do not interfere with the applicant's ability to
respond effectively to the emergency.
(b) The commissioner shall determine that an
emergency situation exists whenever the commissioner finds that an applicant
has demonstrated:
(i) The necessity for
immediate or temporary relief due to natural disaster, fire, unforeseen safety
consideration, major accident, equipment failure, foreclosure, receivership or
action by the Department or other circumstances determined appropriate by the
Department;
(ii) The serious
adverse effect of delay on the applicant and the community that would be
occasioned by compliance with the regular requirements for CON; and
(iii) The lack of substantial change in the
facility or services that existed before the emergency situation.
(c) In an emergency situation the
Department may waive in writing any penalties for failure to receive a CON for
an otherwise reviewable project. After the emergency is resolved the Department
will review the action to determine whether any additional review is
required.
(2)
Amended Applications. An application may only be amended in the
following circumstances: Any applicant may submit a revision to an application
at any time prior to the date on which the preliminary report is submitted to
the Commissioner of the Department. The Department may declare the revised
application a new application and process it in accordance with the provisions
of these rule pertaining to new applications. No letter of intent will be
required. Persons directly affected by a review of the revised application will
have access to the revised preliminary analysis and the rights to a public
hearing under Section 71.05(G). The Department may limit the scope of the
verbal or written testimony and/or evidence presented at the public hearing to
information directly related to the portion of the application that has been
revised.
(3)
Voluntary
withdrawal of application. During the review period, prior to the date
that staff submits a final report to the Commissioner, an applicant may
withdraw an application without prejudice by filing written notice of the
withdrawal with the Department. A withdrawn application may be resubmitted at a
later date, as a new application requiring a new letter of intent, filing fees
and review.
(4)
Suspension of
review. Any applicant may request and be granted a suspension of the
review process prior to the date on which staff submits its final analysis to
the Commissioner. A request for suspension of the review process shall be for
specific periods of no less than 60 days and not greater than one twelve month
period in duration. Such a request, if granted, shall have no effect on
competing applications which shall continue to be reviewed without
interruption. Failure to reactivate within this time period will result in
automatic withdrawal of the suspended application.
(5)
Reapplication. A period of
three (3) years from the date of the Department's decision to deny a CON must
lapse before an applicant denied a CON for a proposed expenditure or action can
reapply for a CON covering the same or significantly similar proposal, except
whenever the Department determines that:
(a)
There has been a substantial change in existing or proposed facilities or
services of the type proposed in the area served or proposed to be served by
the applicant; or
(b) There has
been a substantial change in the need for health facilities or services of the
type proposed in the area served or proposed to be served by the
applicant.
(6)
Conflict of interest. In addition to the limitations of Title 5,
M.R.S.A., section 18, a member or employee of the Department who has a
substantial economic or fiduciary interest which would be affected by a
recommendation or decision to issue or deny a CON or who has a close relative
or economic associate whose interest would be so affected shall be ineligible
to participate in the review, recommendation or decision making process with
respect to any application for which the conflict of interest exists.
(7)
Division of project to evade cost
limitation prohibited. A health care facility or other party required to
obtain a CON may not separate portions of a single project into components,
including, but not limited to, site facility and equipment, to evade the cost
limitations or other requirements of this Act.
(8)
Rules. The Department shall
adopt any rules, standard, criteria, plans or procedures that may be necessary
to carry out the provisions and purposes of the CON Act. The Department shall
provide for public notice and hearing on all proposed rules, standards,
criteria, plans, procedures or schedules pursuant to Title 5, M.R.S.A., chapter
375. Unless otherwise provided by the CON Act, rules adopted pursuant to the
CON Act are routine technical rules as defined by Title 5, M.R.S.A., chapter
375, subchapter II-A.
(9)
Consultation on new technologies and needs. In connection with the
development of policies and procedures to implement the CON Act, the
commissioner may, from time to time, consult with persons with relevant skill
and experience. This may be in regards to new medical technologies and the
impact of those technologies on the health care delivery system in the State;
unmet need for health care services in the State; and the quality of health
care.
(10)
Cost -of-living
adjustment. Every 2 years, beginning January 1, 2005, the Department
shall review the monetary figures contained in the CON Act. The Department
shall revise those figures to correspond to changes in the Consumer Price Index
medical index by adopting rules setting the new figures.
(11)
Federal Funding. The
Department is authorized to accept any federal funds to be used for the
purposes of carrying out this chapter.
(12)
Public Information. The
Department shall prepare and publish at least annually a report on its
activities conducted pursuant to this Act. The annual report must include
information on all CON's granted and denied. With regard to all certificates
granted on a conditional basis, the report must include a summary of
information reported and any accompanying statements by the commissioner or
Department staff submitted regarding the reports.