360 CMR app B

Example of a Penalty calculation pursuant to 360 CMR 2.33(1)(b):

Example of Facts:

A sewer user has a process discharge of 20,000 gallons per day. In its last four monitoring reports, the following violations have been found: 1 lead violation at 0.4 mg/l (assume lead has a limit of 0.2 mg/l); 1 copper violation at 6.0 mg/l and one copper violation at 1.8 mg/l (assume copper has a limit of 1.0 mg/l); one mercury violation at 0.004 mg/l (assume mercury is a prohibited substance with an enforcement limit of 0.001 mg/l); and two pH violations, one at 4.2 S.U. and one at 12.4 S.U. (assume pH is a violation if it is outside the range of 5.5-12.0 S.U.).

Use of the Penalty Calculation Chart:

For lead at 0.4 mg/l, the Authority determining that the violation was caused by negligence in operating pretreatment:

Evaluation Criteria Score Weight Factor Weighted Score
Violation Magnitude 3 x 30 =90
Flow 4 x 30 =120
Culpability 4 x 20 =80
Frequency 4 x 20 =80
TOTAL 370
x $10
PENALTY AMOUNT $3,700

For copper at 6.0 mg/l, the Authority determining that the violation was caused by gross negligence in exceeding the design flow of the pretreatment system:

Evaluation Criteria

Score

Weight Factor

Weighted Score

Violation Magnitude

10

x 30

= 300

Flow

4

x 30

= 120

Culpability

8

x 20

= 160

Frequency

8

x 20

= 160

TOTAL

740

x $10

PENALTY AMOUNT

$7,400

For copper at 1.8 mg/l, the Authority determining that the violation was caused by gross negligence in exceeding the design flow of the pretreatment system:

Evaluation Criteria

Score Weight Factor

Weighted Score

Violation Magnitude

2 x 30

= 60

Flow

4 x 30

= 120

Culpability

8 x 20

= 160

Frequency

8 x 20

= 160

TOTAL

500 x $10

PENALTY AMOUNT

$5,000

For mercury at 0.004 mg/l, the Authority determining that the violation was an intentional discharge of mercury without pretreatment:

Evaluation Criteria

Score Weight Factor

Weighted Score

Violation Magnitude

10 x 30

= 300

Flow

4 x 30

= 120

Culpability

10 x 20

= 200

Frequency

4 x 20

= 80

TOTAL

700 x $10

PENALTY AMOUNT

$7,000

For pH at 4.2 S.U., the Authority determining that the pretreatment system was known by the user to be inadequate to prevent pH violations:

Evaluation Criteria

Score Weight Factor

Weighted Score

Violation Magnitude

5 x 30

= 150

Flow

4 x 30

= 120

Culpability

9 x 20

= 180

Frequency

8 x 20

= 160

TOTAL

610 x $10

PENALTY AMOUNT

$6,100

For pH at 12.4 S.U., the Authority determining that the pretreatment system was known by the user to be inadequate to prevent pH violations:

Evaluation Criteria

Score Weight Factor

Weighted Score

Violation Magnitude

1 x 30

= 30

Flow

4 x 30

= 120

Culpability

9 x 20

= 180

Frequency

8 x 20

= 160

TOTAL

490 x $10

PENALTY AMOUNT

$4,900

Notes

360 CMR app B

The penalties so calculated would then be reviewed according to the adjustment factors of 360 CMR 2.33(1)(c) and 360 CMR 2.33(6).

State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.


No prior version found.