Nev. Admin. Code § 459.95366 - Analysis of worst-case scenarios
1. The owner or
operator of a facility may use the guidelines set forth in the R.M.P.
Guidance for Off-Site Consequence Analysis, which is adopted by
reference pursuant to NAC 459.95528, to calculate any of the values required in
this section.
2. For each process,
the owner or operator shall prepare:
(a) One
worst-case release scenario that is estimated to create the greatest distance
in any direction to an endpoint resulting from an accidental release of a toxic
highly hazardous substance under worst-case conditions as described in NAC
459.95364;
(b) One worst-case
release scenario that is estimated to create the greatest distance in any
direction to an endpoint resulting from an accidental ignition or detonation of
a flammable or explosive substance under worst-case release conditions as
described in NAC 459.95364; and
(c)
Additional worst-case release scenarios for a facility if:
(1) A worst-case release from another process
at the facility potentially affects different public receptors than those
affected by the worst-case release scenario prepared pursuant to paragraphs (a)
and (b); or
(2) A toxic or
flammable highly hazardous substance is present in excess of the threshold
quantity and was not considered as part of the worst-case release scenarios
prepared pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b).
3. When preparing a worst-case release
scenario:
(a) For a highly hazardous
substance, the owner or operator shall assume that the release quantity is the
greater of:
(1) For substances in a vessel,
the greatest amount held in a single vessel, taking into account administrative
controls that limit the maximum quantity.
(2) For substances in pipes, the greatest
amount in a pipe, taking into account administrative controls that limit the
maximum quantity.
(b)
For an explosive, the owner or operator shall select the inventory that
produces the greatest distance to an endpoint.
4. The owner or operator shall model each
substance as a toxic substance, a flammable substance or an explosive as
described in NAC 459.9533. If a substance is not described as a toxic
substance, a flammable substance or an explosive pursuant to NAC 459.9533, the
owner or operator shall select the scenario providing the most significant
impact on employees and the public.
5. For toxic substances that are normally
gases at ambient temperature and handled as a gas or as a liquid under
pressure, the owner or operator shall:
(a)
Assume that the quantity in the vessel or pipe, as determined pursuant to
subsection 3, is released as a gas over a period of 10 minutes;
(b) Assume that the release rate, in pounds
per minute, is the total quantity divided by 10, unless passive mitigation
systems are in place; and
(c)
Calculate the impact of passive mitigation measures on the release rate using
the R.M.P. Guidance for Off-Site Consequence Analysis, which
is adopted by reference pursuant to NAC 459.95528.
6. For gases handled as refrigerated liquids
at ambient pressure, the owner or operator:
(a) Shall assume that the substance is
released as a gas in 10 minutes, if the released substance is not contained by
passive mitigation systems or if the contained pool would have a depth of 1 cm
(0.39 inch) or less; and
(b) May
assume that the quantity of the substance in the vessel or pipe, as determined
pursuant to subsection 3, is spilled instantaneously to form a liquid pool, if
the released substance is contained by passive mitigation systems in a pool
with a depth greater than 1 cm (0.39 inch). The owner or operator shall
calculate the volatilization rate at the boiling point of the substance and at
the conditions set forth in subsections 7, 8 and 9.
7. For toxic substances that are normally
liquids at ambient temperature, the owner or operator shall assume that the
quantity in the vessel or pipe, as determined pursuant to subsection 3, is
spilled instantaneously to form a liquid pool. The owner or operator shall
determine the surface area of the pool by assuming that the liquid spreads to 1
cm (0.39 inch) deep, unless passive mitigation systems are in place that serve
to contain the spill and limit the surface area. If passive mitigation is in
place, the owner or operator shall use the surface area of the contained liquid
to calculate the volatilization rate. If the release would occur onto a surface
that is not paved or smooth, the owner or operator may take into account the
actual surface characteristics.
8.
When determining the volatilization rate for purposes of subsection 7, the
owner or operator shall account for:
(a) The
highest daily maximum temperature occurring during the past 3 years;
(b) The temperature of the substance in the
vessel; and
(c) If the liquid
spilled is a mixture or solution, the concentration of the substance.
9. For purposes of subsection 7,
the owner or operator shall determine the rate of release to air from the
volatilization rate of the liquid pool determined pursuant to subsection 8. The
owner or operator may use the methodology set forth in the R.M.P.
Guidance for Off-Site Consequence Analysis, which is adopted by
reference pursuant to NAC 459.95528, or another publicly available technique
that accounts for the modeling conditions and is recognized in the industry as
a current practice. The owner or operator may use a proprietary model that
accounts for the modeling conditions if the owner or operator allows the
Division access to the model and describes to local emergency planners, upon
request, the features of the model and any differences from publicly available
models.
10. The owner or operator
shall assume that the quantity of the flammable substance determined pursuant
to subsection 3 vaporizes resulting in a vapor cloud explosion. The owner or
operator shall use a yield factor of 10 percent of the available energy
released in the explosion to determine the distance to the explosion endpoint
if the model used is based on TNT-equivalent methods.
11. For explosives, the owner or operator
shall employ methods for calculating overpressure based upon generally accepted
practices.
12. The owner or
operator shall use the parameters defined in NAC 459.95364 to determine the
distance to the endpoints. The owner or operator may use the methodology
provided in the R.M.P. Guidance for Off-Site Consequence
Analysis, which is adopted by reference pursuant to NAC 459.95528, or
any commercially or publicly available technique for air dispersion modeling if
the technique accounts for the modeling conditions and is recognized in the
industry as a current practice. The owner or operator may use a proprietary
model that accounts for the modeling conditions if the owner or operator allows
the Division access to the model and describes to local emergency planners,
upon request, the features of the model and any differences in the model from
publicly available models.
13. The
owner or operator may consider passive mitigation systems for the worst-case
release scenario analysis if the mitigation system is capable of withstanding
the event that triggered the release and still function as intended.
14. Notwithstanding the provisions of
subsection 3, the owner or operator shall select as the worst-case scenario for
a flammable substance, the worst-case scenario for a toxic highly hazardous
substance or the worst-case scenario for an explosive, a scenario based on
proximity to the boundary of the facility and smaller quantities of the
substance handled at a higher process temperature or pressure if such a
scenario would result in a greater distance to an endpoint beyond the facility
boundary than the scenario provided pursuant to subsection 3.
Notes
NRS 459.3818, 459.3833
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.