Okla. Admin. Code § 170:20-3-2 - Selection criteria
Proposals which comply with all prerequisites will be further evaluated using a system of weighted criteria. Sites will receive a rating on each criterion, which will then be multiplied by its weight to determine the score.
(1) Net costs. Cost is the most
important criterion and carries a weight of seven. The proposal will include
sufficient information for the department to estimate first and subsequent year
rent, start-up cost, and operating cost. If the community can offer any
inducements, the inducements will be clearly stated along with estimates of
their value. The department will verify estimates. Inducements will not be
considered unless there is proof that they will be forthcoming. The department
will calculate the net present value of the costs of each site, less
inducements, for a ten year period. The site with the lowest net present value
will receive the highest rating. The site with the highest net present value
will receive the lowest rating. The sites in between will be rated
proportionately to their position on the range continuum.
(2) Support costs. The support costs
criterion carries a weight of two. Judgements will be made whether the support
costs are low, medium, or high. Low will carry a rating of ten; medium a rating
of five; and high a rating of zero.
(3) Inmate jobs. The inmate jobs criterion
carries a weight of two. All proposals will have sufficient public works
potential for a 150-bed community work center. Some sites may be able to employ
more inmates full-time than others. Sites will be rated proportionately
according to the number of full-time jobs projected to be available.
(4) Impact of work. The impact of work
criterion carries a weight of three. To be considered, sites must provide
adequate prisoner public works opportunities. However, some sites may provide
better or worse opportunities than average. Due to the nature of this
criterion, judgements will be made whether the projects are superior, good, or
fair. Superior will carry a rating of ten, good a rating of five, and fair a
rating of zero.
(5) Number of
Department of Corrections facilities in the area. The number of Department of
Corrections facilities in the area criterion carries a weight of two. A radius
will be determined with which to evaluate proximity. Sites further removed from
Department of Corrections facilities will receive higher ratings than sites
closer to Department of Corrections facilities.
(6) Department of Corrections budget in the
site area. The Department of Corrections budget in the site area criterion
carries a weight of two. Using the same radius as indicated in
170:25-3-2(5)
of this Chapter, the total department budget for correctional facilities in
each site area a will be calculated. Proportional ratings will then be assigned
to each site with the lower values receiving higher ratings.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.