Or. Admin. R. 660-016-0005 - Identify Conflicting Uses
(1)
It is the responsibility of local government to identify conflicts with
inventoried Goal 5 resource sites. This is done primarily by examining the uses
allowed in broad zoning districts established by the jurisdiction (e.g., forest
and agricultural zones). A conflicting use is one which, if allowed, could
negatively impact a Goal 5 resource site. Where conflicting uses have been
identified, Goal 5 resource sites may impact those uses. These impacts must be
considered in analyzing the economic, social, environmental and energy (ESEE)
consequences:
(2) Preserve the
Resource Site: If there are no conflicting uses for an identified resource
site, the jurisdiction must adopt policies and ordinance provisions, as
appropriate, which ensure preservation of the resource site.
(3) Determine the Economic, Social,
Environmental, and Energy Consequences: If conflicting uses are identified, the
economic, social, environmental and energy consequences of the conflicting uses
must be determined. Both the impacts on the resource site and on the
conflicting use must be considered in analyzing the ESEE consequences. The
applicability and requirements of other Statewide Planning Goals must also be
considered, where appropriate, at this stage of the process. A determination of
the ESEE consequences of identified conflicting uses is adequate if it enables
a jurisdiction to provide reasons to explain why decisions are made for
specific sites.
Notes
Stat. Auth.: ORS 183 & 197
Stats. Implemented:ORS 197.040
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.