Or. Admin. Code § 737-020-0080 - Provider Sanctions
(1)
ODOT-TSO may impose sanctions when it determines a provider has violated any
provision of Oregon Laws 2017, chapter 629, section 4 or administrative rules
promulgated by ODOT-TSO.
(2) In
determining an appropriate sanction, ODOT may consider the following criteria:
(a) The severity of the violation;
(b) The impact of the violation on
participants;
(c) The number of
similar or related violations by the provider;
(d) Whether the violation was willful or
intentional; or
(e) The history of
prior sanctions imposed by ODOT-TSO.
(3) ODOT-TSO may impose sanctions when it
determines violations have occurred or are occurring. ODOT-TSO may issue any
level of sanction it considers appropriate to the specific violation. Sanctions
may include one or more of the following:
(a)
Warning;
(b) Suspension from the
approved list up to one year; or
(c) Revocation of approved status, removal
from the approved list, and a prohibition on applying for approval for up to
five years.
(4) Reasons
that ODOT may sanction a provider include, but are not limited to, the
following:
(a) Misrepresenting information to
obtain or maintain approved provider status, regardless of when the
misrepresentation is discovered:
(A)
Misrepresenting the program or its delivery;
(B) Misrepresenting or failing to maintain
eligibility requirements; or
(C)
Falsely claiming to correct program deficiencies.
(b) Knowingly making a false statement or
representation to ODOT-TSO or an actual or prospective course participant for
the purpose of obtaining benefit to the provider;
(c) Failing to adhere to an approved
curriculum or a policy adopted under OAR
737-020-0050(1)
(d) Failing to correct
deficiencies identified by ODOT-TSO, or to provide a complete response a
Warning addressing each deficiency, within stated timelines;
(e) Failing to abide by any applicable OAR or
ORS;
(f) Failing to submit required
forms or information by the due date;
(g) Issuing a Completion Certificate to a
participant who has not successfully completed the approved course, or failing
to promptly issue a Completion Certificate to a qualified participant who has
successfully completed the approved course; or
(h) Failing to update course curriculum at
least every three years or when directed to do so by ODOT-TSO within a given
time period.
(5) The
provider may provide ODOT-TSO with evidence of any mitigating circumstances
related to alleged rule violations, which may include the provider's ability to
comply or the degree of difficulty to comply.
(6) When ODOT-TSO takes action to suspend or
revoke an approved provider ODOT-TSO will send notice to the approved provider.
The notice will be in writing and state that the suspension or revocation will
begin in 30 calendar days from the date on the notice. The notice will be
served by first class mail sent to the current address on record with
ODOT-TSO.
(7) If ODOT-TSO suspends
or revokes a provider, individuals who owned, operated, or knowingly
participated in the violations of the provider at the time of the act may not,
for the full term of the suspension or revocation, own, operate or participate
in an ODOT-TSO approved distracted driving avoidance course.
(8) A suspended or revoked provider may not
schedule participants for distracted driving avoidance courses, accept course
fees or conduct distracted driving avoidance courses for an ODOT-approved
program for the full term of suspension or revocation.
(9) A suspended or revoked provider must
issue course fee refunds to enrolled participants who are monetarily affected
by the suspension or revocation.
Notes
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 184.619, 811.507 & 811.508
Statutes/Other Implemented: OL 2017, ch 629 sec. 4
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.