22 Tex. Admin. Code § 80.5 - Peer Review Process
(a) During the
investigation of a complaint, the Enforcement Committee may order the outside
peer review of a licensee's standard of patient care or billing
practices.
(b) To qualify as a peer
reviewer, a person shall:
(1) have an active
license with the Board or appropriate professional credentials;
(2) have no prior violations of Board
statutes or rules;
(3) have no open
complaints;
(4) have no felony
convictions or misdemeanor convictions for a crime of moral
turpitude;
(5) show sufficient
training or experience to offer an informed opinion;
(6) show knowledge of accepted standards of
chiropractic care in Texas or other professional standards related to the
alleged violation; and
(7) have an
acceptable malpractice complaint history.
(c) A peer reviewer may not review a
complaint if the peer reviewer has:
(1) a
direct financial interest or relationship with any party or witness to the
complaint that gives the appearance of a conflict of interest;
(2) a familial relationship within the third
degree of affinity with any party or witness;
(3) personal knowledge of any information
about any party or witness related to the complaint; or
(4) any other reason where the peer reviewer
could not fairly and impartially consider the complaint.
(d) The Board shall maintain a list of peer
reviewers and shall periodically audit the list to confirm their
qualifications.
(e) Board staff
shall select a peer reviewer when an investigator identifies a standard of care
or other professional standard beyond the expertise of staff in the
complaint.
(f) Board staff shall
randomly select a peer reviewer from the list based on the peer reviewer's
qualifications to review the type of complaint.
(g) The executive director shall remove a
peer reviewer from the list for:
(1) failure
to maintain the required qualifications;
(2) failure to timely complete
reports;
(3) failure to inform the
Board of potential or apparent conflicts of interest; or
(4) failure to maintain the confidentiality
of any matter.
(h) The
Board shall provide to the peer reviewer:
(1)
the complaint;
(2) the
investigator's report;
(3) the
Board's peer review report form; and
(4) a contract for services.
(i) The peer reviewer shall review
all relevant information to determine if a licensee violated the applicable
standard of care in Texas or other professional standard and prepare a written
report.
(j) The peer reviewer's
report shall include:
(1) the peer reviewer's
qualifications;
(2) the relevant
facts of the complaint;
(3) the
applicable standard of care or other professional standard;
(4) an application of the standard of care in
Texas or other professional standard to the facts;
(5) a finding of whether the standard of care
or other professional standard was met; and
(6) the clinical basis for the findings,
including the use of any peer-reviewed journals, studies, or reports.
(k) A peer reviewer may not offer
a legal opinion as to whether a particular statute, Board rule, or other law
was violated.
(l) A peer reviewer
may not offer an opinion on the legal liability of any individual for an injury
sustained by a patient.
(m) The
peer reviewer shall complete and return the review to the Board within 30 days,
unless the peer reviewer requests more time due to the complaint's
complexity.
(n) The Board shall
give the peer reviewer's report to the licensee within 30 days of
receipt.
(o) The Enforcement
Committee shall consider the report and the licensee's response in determining
if a violation occurred.
(p) The
Enforcement Committee may order additional peer reviews if necessary.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.