28 Tex. Admin. Code § 21.2439 - Nonquantitative Treatment Limitations Generally
(a) NQTLs in general. NQTLs generally are
treatment limitations on the scope or duration of benefits for treatment. An
issuer is prohibited from imposing NQTLs on MH/SUD benefits in any
classification unless, under the terms of the plan or coverage as written and
in operation, any processes, strategies, evidentiary standards, or other
factors used in applying the NQTL to MH/SUD benefits in a classification are
comparable to, and are applied no more stringently than, those used in applying
the limitation with respect to medical/surgical benefits in the same
classification.
(b) Numerical
application of NQTLs. While NQTLs are generally defined as treatment
limitations that are not expressed numerically, the application of an NQTL in a
numerical way does not modify its nonquantitative character. For example,
standards for provider admission to participate in a network are NQTLs because
such standards are treatment limitations that typically are not expressed
numerically. But these standards sometimes rely on numerical standards such as
numerical reimbursement rates. In this case, the numerical expression of
reimbursement rates does not modify the nonquantitative character of the
provider admission standards. Therefore, reimbursement rates to which a
participating provider must agree are to be evaluated in accordance with the
rules for NQTLs.
(c) Examples. The
following is an illustrative, non-exhaustive list of NQTLs:
(1) medical management standards limiting or
excluding benefits based on medical necessity or medical appropriateness, or
based on whether the treatment is experimental or investigative;
(2) preauthorization or ongoing authorization
requirements;
(3) concurrent review
standards;
(4) formulary design for
prescription drugs;
(5) for plans
with multiple network tiers (such as preferred providers and participating
providers), network tier design;
(6) standards for provider admission to
participate in a network, including reimbursement rates;
(7) plan or issuer methods for determining
usual, customary, and reasonable charges;
(8) refusal to pay for higher-cost therapies
until it can be shown that a lower-cost therapy is not effective (also known as
"fail-first" policies or "step therapy" protocols);
(9) exclusions of specific treatments for
certain conditions;
(10)
restrictions on applicable provider billing codes;
(11) standards for providing access to
out-of-network providers;
(12)
exclusions based on failure to complete a course of treatment; and
(13) restrictions based on geographic
location, facility type, provider specialty, and other criteria that limit the
scope or duration of benefits provided under the plan or coverage.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.