Utah Admin. Code R33-16-101a - Grounds for a Protest
(1) This rule
applies to protests filed under Section
63G-6a-1602.
(2) In accordance with the requirements in
Section
63G-6a-1602,
a person filing a protest must include a concise statement of the grounds upon
which the protest is made.
(a) A concise
statement of the grounds for a protest must include the relevant facts and
evidence leading the protestor to contend that a grievance has occurred,
including:
(i) an alleged violation of Title
63G, Chapter 6a, Utah Procurement Code;
(ii) an alleged violation of Title R33 or
other applicable rule;
(iii) a
provision of the solicitation allegedly not being followed;
(iv) a provision of the solicitation alleged
to be:
(A) ambiguous;
(B) confusing;
(C) contradictory;
(D) unduly restrictive;
(E) erroneous;
(F) anticompetitive; or
(G) unlawful;
(v) an alleged error made by the evaluation
committee or procurement unit;
(vi)
an allegation of bias or discrimination by officials representing the
procurement unit or the evaluation committee or an individual committee member;
or
(vii) a scoring criterion
allegedly not being correctly applied or calculated.
(b) "Relevant Facts and Evidence" as referred
to in Section
63G-6a-1602,
must be specific enough to enable the protest officer to determine, if such
facts and evidence are proven to be true, whether a legitimate basis for the
protest exists.
(c) None of the
following qualify as a concise statement of the grounds for a protest:
(i) claims made after the applicable
deadlines set forth in law, rule, or the solicitation document, that the
specifications, terms and conditions, or other elements of a solicitation are
ambiguous, confusing, contradictory, unduly restrictive, erroneous, or
anticompetitive;
(ii) vague or
unsubstantiated claims or allegations that do not reference specific facts and
evidence including, but not limited to, vague or unsubstantiated claims or
allegations such as:
(A) the protestor should
have received a higher score;
(B)
another vendor should have received a lower score;
(C) a service or product provided by a
protestor is better than another vendor's service or product;
(D) another vendor cannot provide the
procurement item for the price bid or perform the services described in the
solicitation;
(E) the procurement
unit's eProcruement system or other electronic procurement system:
(i) was slow, not operating properly, or was
difficult to use or understand;
(ii) could not be accessed or did not allow
documents to be downloaded; or
(iii) did not allow a response to be
submitted after the deadline for receiving responses expired;
(F) the protestor did not receive
individual notice of a solicitation or was otherwise unaware of a solicitation
when a procurement unit has complied with the public notice requirement in
Section
63G-6a-112;
or
(G) officials representing the
procurement unit or the evaluation committee or an individual committee member
acted in a biased or discriminatory manner against the protestor;
(iii) filing a protest requesting:
(A) a detailed explanation of the thinking
and scoring of evaluation committee members, beyond the official justification
statement described in Section
63G-6a-708;
(B) protected information beyond what is
provided under the disclosure provisions of Title 63G, Chapter 6a; or
(C) other information, documents, or
explanations reasonably deemed to be not in compliance with the Utah Code or
this rule by the protest officer.
(3) Each of the claims and allegations listed
in Subsection (2)(c)(ii) could serve as legitimate grounds for filing a protest
if properly supported by relevant facts and evidence.
(4) In accordance with Section
63G-6a-1603,
a protest officer may dismiss a protest if the concise statement of the grounds
for filing a protest does not comply with Title 63G, Chapter 6a, Part 16,
Protests, or this rule.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.