12-025 Code Vt. R. 12-030-025-X - VERMONT WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
For the purposes of these Water Quality Standards, the terms below shall have the following meanings unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context.
The Secretary may issue declaratory rulings regarding the water quality standards pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 1252(f).
All numeric water quality criteria shall be applied by rounding to the nearest significant number in accordance with standard mathematic practice. For the purposes of these rules, sample collection, preservation, handling and analysis shall conform as closely as practicable to methods established in the most current edition or publication of any of the following sources:
Where the natural flow regime is not altered or substantially influenced by any human-made structure or device, compliance with the applicable numeric water quality criteria shall be calculated on the basis of the 7Q10 flow value unless an alternate flow statistic is specified in Section 3-01 of these rules. This rule shall not be construed to allow less than normal design operation of any treatment facility during periods of low streamflow or to otherwise waive the terms of any permit.
The Secretary shall insure that conditions due to discharges of waste within any mixing zone shall:
The Secretary shall insure that, in addition to complying with all other applicable provisions of the statute and these rules, any waste management zone meets the following criteria:
Waters in which one or more applicable water quality criteria are not met due to natural influences shall not be in noncompliance with respect to such criteria. In such waters, activities may be specifically authorized by a permit, provided that those activities do not further reduce the quality of the receiving waters and would comply with all other applicable criteria.
The following water quality criteria shall be achieved in waters, as specified below:
Table 1. Phosphorus Criteria for Segments Within Lake Champlain and Lake Memphremagog.
Lake Segment (See Appendix B) |
Phosphorus Criterion (mg/L as P)1 |
|
Lake Champlain |
||
Main Lake |
0.010 |
|
Malletts Bay |
0.010 |
|
Burlington Bay |
0.014 |
|
Shelburne Bay |
0.014 |
|
Northeast Arm |
0.014 |
|
Isle LaMotte |
0.014 |
|
Otter Creek |
0.014 |
|
Port Henry |
0.014 |
|
St. Albans Bay |
0.017 |
|
Missisquoi Bay |
0.025 |
|
South Lake A |
0.025 |
|
South Lake B |
0.054 |
|
Lake Memphremagog |
||
Main Lake |
0.014 |
|
South Bay |
0.025 |
The following water quality criteria shall be achieved in all waters, regardless of their classification:
Table 2. Combined Nutrient Criteria for Aquatic Biota and Wildlife in Rivers and Streams
Class A(1) |
Class B(1) |
Classes A(2) and B(2) |
|||||||
Stream Type2 |
SHG |
MHG |
WWMG |
SHG |
MHG |
WWMG |
SHG |
MHG |
WWMG |
Nutrient Concentrations |
|||||||||
Total Phosphorus (µg/L)3 |
10 |
9 |
18 |
10 |
9 |
21 |
12 |
15 |
27 |
Nutrient Response Conditions |
|||||||||
pH |
Not to exceed 8.5 standard units. |
||||||||
Turbidity |
Consistent with the criteria in §29A-302(4) of these rules. |
||||||||
Dissolved Oxygen |
Consistent with the criteria in §29A-302(5) of these rules. |
||||||||
Aquatic Biota |
Consistent with the criteria under §29A-305(a) of these rules. |
||||||||
1. Compliance with nutrient criteria shall be achieved either by compliance with the nutrient concentration values specified above or by compliance with all nutrient response conditions. In situations where the applicable nutrient concentrations are achieved but the nutrient response conditions are not met as a result of nutrient enrichment, the Secretary may establish alternate nutrient concentration values on a site-specific basis, as necessary, to achieve compliance with the nutrient response conditions. All waters shall maintain a level of water quality that provides for the attainment and maintenance of the water quality standards of downstream waters. 2. Stream type determinations made by the Secretary are based on biological community types that relate to stream size, gradient, and elevation. The stream types are Small High Gradient (SHG), Medium High Gradient (MHG), and Warm Water Moderate Gradient (WWMG). 3. Not to be exceeded at low median monthly flow during June through October in a section of the stream representative of well-mixed flow. |
Table 3. Combined Nutrient Criteria for Aesthetics Uses in Lakes, Ponds, and Reservoirs Except for Lake Champlain and Lake Memphremagog1,2
Class A(1) |
Classes A(2) and B(1) |
Class B(2) |
|
Nutrient Concentrations |
|||
Total Phosphorus3 (µg/L) |
12 |
17 |
18 |
Nutrient Response Conditions |
|||
Secchi Disk Depth (meters)4 |
5.0 |
3.2 |
2.6 |
Chlorophyll-a (µg/L)3 |
2.6 |
3.8 |
7.0 |
pH |
Not to exceed 8.5 standard units. |
||
Turbidity |
Consistent with the criteria in §29A-302(4) of these rules. |
||
Dissolved Oxygen |
Consistent with the criteria in §29A-302(5) of these rules. |
||
1. Compliance with nutrient criteria shall be achieved either by compliance with the nutrient concentration values specified above or by compliance with all nutrient response conditions. In situations where the applicable nutrient concentrations are achieved but the nutrient response conditions are not met as a result of nutrient enrichment, the Secretary may establish alternate nutrient concentration values on a site-specific basis, as necessary, to achieve compliance with the nutrient response conditions. All waters shall maintain a level of water quality that provides for the attainment and maintenance of the water quality standards of downstream waters. 2. Applies to lakes and reservoirs greater than 20 acres in surface area with a drainage area to surface area ratio less than 500:1, excluding Lake Champlain and Lake Memphremagog. 3. June through September mean not to be exceeded in the photosynthetic depth (euphotic) zone at a central location in the lake. 4. June through September mean not to be less at a central location in the lake. |
Pursuant to 1253, all waters are classified for one or more uses as Class A(1), A(2), B(1), or B(2). Appendix F of these rules lists the specific classifications for all waters.
To provide for the protection and management of fisheries, waters are designated in Appendix A as being either a cold or a warm water fish habitat. Where appropriate, such designations may be seasonal.
Appendix A. Fish Habitat Designation.
All wetlands, except those designated as cold water fish habitat in paragraph B below, and the following waters are designated as warm water fish habitat for purposes of these rules:
Appendix B. Phosphorus Criteria §3-01(A)(2)(c), Description of Lake Champlain and Lake Memphremagog segments.
Appendix C. Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health and the Aquatic Biota.
Criteria are in micro grams per liter (g/l - parts per billion) unless indicated otherwise.
GENERAL NOTES:
This Appendix has been updated to reflect USEPA recommendations as of October 2012. These recommendations were published in "National Recommended Water Quality Criteria," and can be found at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/current/index.cfm
The most significant changes from previous versions of Appendix C are to Human Health criteria and reflect EPA's new methodology for deriving human health criteria (Methodology for Deriving Ambient Water Quality for the Protection of Human Health" (2000), EPA-822-B-00-004, October, 2000) as published in 65 FR 66443. Additional notes and information concerning these criteria can be found in the documents referenced here. Equations used to calculate hardness-dependent metal criteria have been updated (Appendix E) and factors for converting total recoverable-based to dissolved-based criteria for metals (Appendix D) have been added to reflect current recommendations of USEPA.
"FR Cite/Source" citations have been added to all criteria. This citation refers to the EPA publication from which the criteria are derived. The "Gold Book" is Quality Criteria for Water: 1986. EPA 440/5-86-001.
Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers have been added to Appendix C. CAS numbers provide a unique identification for each chemical.
Tox Class - designated toxicity class for substance: A=Class A carcinogen (known human carcinogen); C=Carcinogenic (probable or possible human carcinogen); TT=Threshold Toxicant (not a known or probable carcinogen); BC=High potential to bioconcentrate or bioaccumulate;
Carcinogenic - for those toxic substances which are identified as carcinogens (A or C) the criteria have been established at a risk level of 10-6 assuming a lifetime exposure to a 70 Kg male consuming 17.5 grams per day of fish and shell-fish products and ingesting 2.0 liters of water per day.
Threshold Toxicants - for those toxic substances which are identified as non-carcinogens (TT) the criteria are best estimates of concentrations which are not expected to produce adverse effects in human health assuming a lifetime exposure to a 70 Kg male consuming 17.5 grams per day of fish and shell-fish products and ingesting 2.0 liters of water per day.
Footnotes:
Appendix D. Conversion Factors For Estimating Dissolved Metals From Total Values
To convert total metal values to dissolved metal, multiply total metal values/concentrations by the conversion factor listed (or calculated) in the table below. Alternative methods for translating total to dissolved values following USEPA guidance ("The Metals Translator: Guidance for Calculating a Total Recoverable Metals Permit Limit from a Dissolved Criterion" EPA 823-B-96-007) may be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Appendix E. Parameters For Calculating Freshwater Total Metals Criteria that are Hardness Dependent
MAC and AAC values are calculated using the equations below the table and inserting the metal-specific values shown in the table.
Hardness-dependent metals criteria can be calculated from the following equations:
MAC (dissolved) = exp{mA [ln (hardness)] + bA} (Conversion Factor from Appendix D)
AAC (dissolved) = exp{mC [ln (hardness)] + bC} (Conversion Factor from Appendix D)
Appendix F. Water Quality Classifications.
Appendix G Application of Biocriteria for Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities in Vermont Wadeable Streams and Rivers.
Introduction
Section 29A-305 of this rule states that the Secretary shall establish and apply numeric biological indexes to determine whether there is support of the aquatic biota use for each class of water. This appendix incorporates into these rules procedures for the collection and analysis of fish and aquatic macroinvertebrate community data used to determine compliance with the class-specific narrative criteria included in §29A-306(a) of these rules.
Community metrics and Indexes of Biotic Integrity (IBI) have been developed expressly for Vermont wadeable rivers and streams to measure the biological integrity of each community. High biological integrity corresponds to a high degree of similarity to the natural condition. The natural condition was determined for each stream type by analyzing fish and macroinvertebrate community structure and function from Vermont waters least affected by human activities. In order of increasing departure from the natural condition of fish and macroinvertebrate communities, waters are categorized as Excellent - Class A(1), Very Good - Class B(1), and Good - Class (B2)3. Guidance on this appendix is provided on the Department's website at: http://dec.vermont.gov/watershed/map/monitor/biomonitoring.
Macroinvertebrate Community Biocriteria
Macroinvertebrate Community Types. Stream macroinvertebrate community types are largely differentiated based on streambed gradient, which dictates substrate coarseness. Moderate to high gradient streams are dominated by gravel to boulder size material, while low gradient streams are dominated by silt and sand bottoms. Three community types have been identified from moderate and high gradient riffle habitats and are differentiated largely on site drainage area and elevation. They are "Small High Gradient (SHG)," "Medium High Gradient (MHG)," and "Warm Water Moderate Gradient (WWMG)." Two low gradient communities are differentiated by habitat characteristics in sand and silt dominated streams. They are "Hybrid Low Gradient (HLG)," and "Slow Low Gradient (SLG)" respectively. Community types are assessed with different combinations of biological criteria and different scales of metric scoring. Community metrics are assessed independently for the three moderate and high gradient (riffle habitat) community types. The two low gradient community types are assessed using Indexes of Biotic Integrity (IBIs), in which individual metric scores are summed to produce a single index value.
Macroinvertebrate Community Sampling Methods. The macroinvertebrate biocriteria are applicable to wadeable streams. For moderate and high gradient communities, a bottom kick-net shall be used to sample four representative riffle habitats from a given stream reach. The four sub-samples shall be composited into a single sample. For low gradient communities, a sample shall consist of a composite of four kick-net sweeps or jabs into woody debris, root wads, macrophytes and or submerged stream-side vegetation.
Samples shall be preserved in the field and processed in the lab to remove macroinvertebrates from plant and mineral detritus. A minimum of 25% of the sample shall be processed to ensure accurate community metric calculations. If 300 organisms are not removed in the initial 25% subsample, the subsample size shall be incrementally expanded until a minimum of 300 organisms are removed. All macroinvertebrates removed shall be identified by taxonomists to the lowest practical level, with a target level of genus or species for most organisms.
Medium and High Gradient "Riffle Habitat" Macroinvertebrate Metrics
The biological integrity of macroinvertebrate communities in moderate to high gradient streams shall be evaluated using an independent multi-metric scoring system calibrated for each of the three stream community types: SHG, MHG, and WWMG (Tables A-1, A-2, and A-3). Threshold values for each community type have been established for each metric that correspond to increasing levels of departure from the natural condition. In a site assessment, the metric or metrics with the greatest departure from natural condition (lowest level of quality) shall be used to assign the community to a level of biological integrity ranging from Poor to Excellent.
Scoring Community Data. Each threshold metric value identifies a level of biological integrity: Excellent, Very Good, Good, or failing to fully support aquatic biota (Fair or Poor). Metric values from a macroinvertebrate community assessment that fall within a specified range immediately below a threshold indicate an "indeterminate" finding for that metric being intermediate between that level and the next lower level.
An assessment of metric values consists of a systematic comparison of each value against threshold criteria for each level, beginning with Excellent, using the following procedure:
Table A-1. Metrics for Small High Gradient (SHG) macroinvertebrate communities.
Click here to view image
Table A- 2. Metrics for Medium High Gradient (MHG) macroinvertebrate communities.
Click here to view image
Table A-3. Metrics for Warm Water Moderate Gradient (WWMG) macroinvertebrate communities.
Click here to view image
Low Gradient Macroinvertebrate IBIs
Two IBIs shall be used to assess the two macroinvertebrate community types in low gradient streams (Tables A-4 and A-5). The IBIs for Slow Low Gradient (SLG) or Hybrid Low Gradient (HLG) community types contain ten metrics, with each metric scored with a value from one to five. A value of one corresponds with Poor, indicating the most departure from natural condition. A value of five corresponds with Excellent, indicating similarity to the natural condition. Table A-6 shows IBI scores with corresponding levels of biological integrity and water classification.
An initial IBI score shall be calculated by summing all individual metric scores, which results in a range of 10-50. The final IBI score shall be determined by applying the following steps:
Fish Community Biocriteria
Fish Community Indexes of Biotic Integrity (IBI). The health or biological integrity of fish communities in wadeable, hard bottomed Vermont streams shall be evaluated by one of two IBIs, the Cold Water IBI (CWIBI) or the Mixed Water IBI (MWIBI). These two IBIs measure the extent of departure of the fish community from the natural condition. The CWIBI is used to assess the biological integrity of cold water, hard bottom streams that support two to four native species. The CWIBI is comprised of six metrics, with each metric having a possible score of 1.5 (Poor) to 7.5 (Excellent). The MWIBI is used to assess the biological integrity of both warm water and cold water, hard bottom streams that support five or more native fish species. The MWIBI is comprised of nine metrics, each having a possible score of 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent). In applying the two IBIs, each metric is scored and then summed to produce a final score. Final scores for both IBIs range from 9 (Poor) to 45 (Excellent). Assessment scores that are within 2 points of the next highest or next lowest rating may be placed into that next highest or lower level by the biologist. Extenuating factors considered in making these determinations may include metric values that show dramatically higher or lower values, the proportion of the community composed of nonnative fish species, and species dominance.
Fish Community Sampling Methods. Fish are collected using one or more backpack electrofishers. A sample shall be taken from a section of stream representative of the habitat present in the overall stream reach and shall be long enough to provide a reliable sample. The minimum section length to be fished in wadeable streams shall be 75 meters and increases with mean section width (Table A-7). When mean river widths exceed 12 meters, sampled area shall be reduced to the area from both banks out to approximately 6 meters. An IBI shall be calculated from a single electrofishing run.
Where density is of particular concern, two to three runs shall be conducted, and a population estimate shall be calculated; when second run catch density exceeds 50% of first run, a third run shall be performed. Individual fish captured during the electrofishing run shall be enumerated by species, and the count of deformities, fin erosion, and lesions or tumor anomalies shall be noted for each species.
Appendix H. Outstanding Resource Waters.
Notes
December 1995
AMENDED:
February 13, 1996 Secretary of State Rule Log # 96-13; October 7, 1996 Secretary of State Rule Log # 96-58; April 21, 1997 Secretary of State Rule Log # 97-13; April 1, 2000 Secretary of State Rule Log # 00-21 (Appendix A only); July 2, 2000 Secretary of State Rule Log # 99-26; February 9, 2006 Secretary of State Rule Log # 06-003; January 1, 2008 Secretary of State Rule Log #07-051; December 30, 2011 Secretary of State Rule Log #11-050; October 30, 2014 Secretary of State Rule Log #14-035; May 2015 [Renumbered from 12 004 052 pursuant to Section 26 of Act No. 138 of 2012]; June 2015 [correction to add Appendices C., D. E.]; December 2015 [correct typographic errors];
STATUTORY AUTHORITY:
10 V.S.A. §§ 1252(e), 1253 and 6025
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.