W. Va. Code R. § 102-1-11 - Occupational Pneumoconiosis
11.1.
Non-medical order. The order of the claim administrator determining whether the
claimant has met the requirements set out in W. Va. Code §
23-4-15b shall
hereinafter be referred to as a non-medical order. Litigation regarding such
order, including any issue regarding the chargeability of an employer, must be
conducted by the parties during the non-medical litigation. The issue of
chargeability shall not be litigated before the Occupational Pneumoconiosis
Board during litigation on permanent partial disability awards for occupational
pneumoconiosis, although medical questions involving the issue of causation of
the claimant's occupational pneumoconiosis may be referred to the Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board.
11.2.
Referrals to the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board during non-medical
litigation shall be made at the discretion of the Board of Review only when
there is a reasonable doubt about any medical question regarding the issues
determined in the non-medical order. In making its opinion as to whether the
claimant's employment with a particular employer could have caused claimant's
breathing problems, the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board shall review any
relevant medical records and such other information in the record as the
Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board deems relevant to the claimant's medical
condition.
11.3. Hearings before
the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board
11.3.1.
Time frames. The procedure regarding requests for extensions of time frames and
continuances of hearings for claims involving permanent partial disability
awards for occupational pneumoconiosis shall be the same as in all other
claims.
11.3.2. Initial hearing.
Upon request of any party, the Board of Review may set an initial hearing for
the sole purpose of examining the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board members
about their findings based upon their examinations of the claimant upon which
the award in litigation was based. Requests for such hearings must be made no
more than ninety (90) days after the beginning of the protesting party's time
frame. At such initial hearing the parties shall not ask the Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board to evaluate evidence introduced in support of the
respective positions unless it is agreed by all parties that the claim shall be
submitted for final determination at the conclusion of that hearing. Initial
hearings shall be set at the discretion of the Board of Review with due regard
to the scheduling of all occupational pneumoconiosis claims in litigation,
particularly the amount of docket time available before the Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board. The setting of such hearings is discretionary and not a
matter of right of any party.
11.3.3. Final hearing. A final hearing shall
be scheduled after the expiration of the time frame. However, a final hearing
will be scheduled only when new evidence has been submitted to the Board of
Review or when a party has timely requested a final hearing to examine or
cross-examine the members of the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board.
11.3.4. Extensions at hearing. Extension of
time frames may be granted by the Board of Review at hearings before the
Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board for good cause or if the requesting party can
show that they have made a request in a timely manner prior to the expiration
of their time frame and that the Board of Review has not yet acted upon this
request.
11.3.5. Hearing when
responding party is unrepresented. In any case in which a non-protesting party
(hereinafter referred to as the responding party) is unrepresented, when new
evidence has been introduced before the Board of Review by the protesting
party, or a request for hearing has been made, an order may be issued at the
end of the protesting party's time frame requiring the responding party and the
Offices of the Insurance Commissioner, if a party, to show cause why the claim
should not be set for hearing after which the claim shall be submitted for
final determination. If no response is received or no good cause is shown by
the responding party or the Offices of the Insurance Commissioner (if it is a
party) within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of such order, the claim shall
be set for hearing before the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board.
11.3.6. Failure to prosecute. In protests in
which no new evidence has been introduced before the Board of Review by the
protesting party, or a request for hearing has not been made, the provisions of
the section on "Failure To Prosecute Protest" shall apply.
11.3.7. Scheduling of hearing. In protests in
which evidence has been introduced by either a protesting or responding party,
a hearing shall be scheduled before the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board after
the expiration of the responding party's time frame unless the parties agree
that a hearing may be set earlier.
11.4. Review of claim files by the
Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board prior to the final hearing In protests set
before the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board pursuant to W. Va. Code
§
23-4-8c(d), it may be necessary for the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board
to review the records of some claims prior to the hearing. This may be due to
the complexity of medical issues, the volume of medical evidence, or other
appropriate reasons. Claims may be subject to such review as follows:
11.4.1. Upon the request of the Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board or the majority of its members who examined the claimant
in the protest in question;
11.4.2.
Upon the ruling of the Board of Review;
11.4.3. Upon the motion of any party in the
protest in question, such motion being subject to the following conditions:
11.4.3.a. The moving party must state with
specificity why such review is necessary, including but not limited to a list
of evidence relied upon by both parties; and
11.4.3.b. The moving party must certify that
the introduction of all evidence by all parties is complete, that the evidence
has been served upon all the parties and that the parties will submit the
protest for final determination at the conclusion of the hearing for which
prior Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board review is requested. The Board of
Review will give consideration to circumstances arising at the hearings which
could not have been reasonably foreseen by the parties, and if in the judgment
of the Board of Review, an additional hearing is necessary, the protest shall
be set for an additional hearing.
11.4.3.c. Failure to satisfy these conditions
shall result in the denial of the request for the Occupational Pneumoconiosis
Board to review the record prior to the hearing.
11.4.3.d. If a motion for such review prior
to a hearing is granted by the Board of Review, the Board of Review may, in its
discretion, order the parties to identify the record to be reviewed by the
Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board.
11.4.3.e. Any ruling by the Board of Review
regarding the granting or denying of a request for Occupational Pneumoconiosis
Board review of a claim prior to a hearing shall be considered interlocutory
and may be appealed only in conjunction with a decision entered in the instant
protest.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.