060-18 Wyo. Code R. §§ 18-18 - [Effective 10/24/2024] Multiple Use
(a) The Board may
issue separate leases for different minerals on the same tract of land. If all
mineral leases under a tract of land are non-producing leases, each lessee has
an equal right to conduct exploratory operations on the land, and each shall
conduct such operations in a manner which does not prevent or unduly interfere
with the operations of the other.
(b) The first lessee to commence actual
production operations so that his lease becomes an operating lease shall have
the right to continue operations without substantial interference from any
other mineral lessee so long as the lease remains in effect. The lessee may not
be deprived of this right in whole or in part without compensation equal to the
value of the rights lost as per Subsection (d)(iii) of this section.
(c) If a lessee desires to commence
operations on the same tract upon which one or more lessees are already
conducting operations, and the lessees can agree that the operations can be
conducted at the same time without materially reducing the amount or value of
the resources which will be produced under each lease, and without unduly
interfering with or raising the cost of operations of the prior lessee(s),
unless he is adequately compensated therefor, the lessees may agree upon a plan
of operations and assessment of costs under which the operations may be carried
out concurrently. Any such agreement shall be submitted to and be subject to
the approval of the Board.
(d) If,
under the circumstances set out in Subsection (c) of this section, the lessees
either agree that the operations cannot be carried out concurrently or cannot
agree upon a plan of operations and assessment of costs, the Director may
resolve the conflict.
(i) If the Director
determines that the operations can be carried out concurrently without
materially reducing the quantity or value of the oil and gas which will be
produced, and either that the costs of operation of any prior lessee(s) will
not be increased significantly, or that if they are, such costs are capable of
determination and if paid by the subsequent lessee will not constitute an
unreasonable burden on the operation, he shall enter his decision approving a
plan of operation and assessment of cost under which operations may be carried
out concurrently.
(ii) If the
Director determines that the proposed operations cannot be carried out
concurrently and that the value which will be realized by the beneficiaries
from the existing operation is such that the proposed operation should be
deferred, he shall enter his decision deferring the development obligations
under the lease of the proposing lessee. The lease will be placed in operating
status and remain in effect subject to the requirement that annual rentals will
be paid and to the condition that if development is deferred more than five (5)
years, the lease may be amended to conform to the lease form in effect upon
commencement of production operations for the class of subsurface resource to
be produced.
(iii) If the Director
determines that the proposed operations cannot be carried out concurrently and
that the benefit which would be realized by the beneficiaries from initiating
the proposed operation so far exceeds that which would be realized from the
existing operation that it is clearly more beneficial to the beneficiaries that
the existing operation be terminated or deferred and the proposed operation
commenced, he shall enter his decision terminating the existing operation and
allowing the commencement of the proposed operation, conditioned upon the
payment by the lessee proposing the operation to the lessee whose operations
are terminated of an amount equal to the value of the rights lost by that
lessee determined in the same manner as if the right were being condemned in
eminent domain proceedings.
(iv) A
lease upon which operations are terminated as above provided shall, upon
payment to the lessee of the value of the right lost, be assigned to the lessee
making the payment, who shall be entitled to hold it subject to the same terms
and conditions applicable to a lease upon which operations were deferred under
Paragraph (ii) of this section.
(v)
If the proposing lessee disagrees with the Director's or the Board's
determination, he may refuse to commence the proposed operation. His refusal to
do so shall not constitute a violation of the covenants for lease development,
unless the amounts he would be required to pay to the prior lessee constitute
such an insubstantial addition to the cost of operation that a reasonable,
prudent lessee would assume them.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
(a) The Board may issue separate leases for different minerals on the same tract of land. If all mineral leases under a tract of land are non-producing leases, each lessee has an equal right to conduct exploratory operations on the land, and each shall conduct such operations in a manner which does not prevent or unduly interfere with the operations of the other.
(b) The first lessee to commence actual production operations so that his lease becomes an operating lease shall have the right to continue operations without substantial interference from any other mineral lessee so long as the lease remains in effect. The lessee may not be deprived of this right in whole or in part without compensation equal to the value of the rights lost as per Subsection (d)(iii) of this section.
(c) If a lessee desires to commence operations on the same tract upon which one or more lessees are already conducting operations, and the lessees can agree that the operations can be conducted at the same time without materially reducing the amount or value of the resources which will be produced under each lease, and without unduly interfering with or raising the cost of operations of the prior lessee(s), unless he is adequately compensated therefor, the lessees may agree upon a plan of operations and assessment of costs under which the operations may be carried out concurrently. Any such agreement shall be submitted to and be subject to the approval of the Board.
(d) If, under the circumstances set out in Subsection (c) of this section, the lessees either agree that the operations cannot be carried out concurrently or cannot agree upon a plan of operations and assessment of costs, the Director may resolve the conflict.
(i) If the Director determines that the operations can be carried out concurrently without materially reducing the quantity or value of the oil and gas which will be produced, and either that the costs of operation of any prior lessee(s) will not be increased significantly, or that if they are, such costs are capable of determination and if paid by the subsequent lessee will not constitute an unreasonable burden on the operation, he shall enter his decision approving a plan of operation and assessment of cost under which operations may be carried out concurrently.
(ii) If the Director determines that the proposed operations cannot be carried out concurrently and that the value which will be realized by the beneficiaries from the existing operation is such that the proposed operation should be deferred, he shall enter his decision deferring the development obligations under the lease of the proposing lessee. The lease will be placed in operating status and remain in effect subject to the requirement that annual rentals will be paid and to the condition that if development is deferred more than five (5) years, the lease may be amended to conform to the lease form in effect upon commencement of production operations for the class of subsurface resource to be produced.
(iii) If the Director determines that the proposed operations cannot be carried out concurrently and that the benefit which would be realized by the beneficiaries from initiating the proposed operation so far exceeds that which would be realized from the existing operation that it is clearly more beneficial to the beneficiaries that the existing operation be terminated or deferred and the proposed operation commenced, he shall enter his decision terminating the existing operation and allowing the commencement of the proposed operation, conditioned upon the payment by the lessee proposing the operation to the lessee whose operations are terminated of an amount equal to the value of the rights lost by that lessee determined in the same manner as if the right were being condemned in eminent domain proceedings.
(iv) A lease upon which operations are terminated as above provided shall, upon payment to the lessee of the value of the right lost, be assigned to the lessee making the payment, who shall be entitled to hold it subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to a lease upon which operations were deferred under Paragraph (ii) of this section.
(v) If the proposing lessee disagrees with the Director's or the Board's determination, he may refuse to commence the proposed operation. His refusal to do so shall not constitute a violation of the covenants for lease development, unless the amounts he would be required to pay to the prior lessee constitute such an insubstantial addition to the cost of operation that a reasonable, prudent lessee would assume them.