060-40 Wyo. Code R. §§ 40-6 - ARPA Eligibility Justification
All projects under this Chapter must be eligible for funding under ARPA and the Final Rule. Eligible projects must be a direct and proportional response to COVID-19 or its negative economic impacts.
(a) Each application shall contain a
justification explaining how the project is eligible under ARPA for funding.
(i) Applications for capital projects shall
include the capital project justification described in Subsection (b) of this
Section.
(ii) Application for rural
telehealth projects shall include the rural telehealth project justification
described in Subsection (c) of this Section.
(b) Justification for Capital Projects. For
each proposed capital project, the application shall contain a written
justification, which shall include:
(i) A
detailed description of the identifiable harm caused or exacerbated by COVID-19
that the project is intended to address. This description shall include:
(A) A detailed description of the specific
harm to be addressed by the requested funding;
(B) A detailed description of how the
specified harm was exacerbated or caused by COVID-19; and
(C) Supporting quantitative information on
the extent and type of the specified harm, such as the number of individuals or
entities affected, and establishing a link between the harm and
COVID-19.
(ii) An
independent assessment demonstrating why a capital project is appropriate to
address the specified harm, which shall include:
(A) An explanation of why the applicant's
existing capital equipment, property, or facilities are inadequate to
addressing the specified harm;
(B)
A description of how the proposed project will address the identified
harm;
(C) An explanation of why
policy changes or additional funding to pertinent programs or services would be
insufficient without the corresponding capital projects; and
(D) A description of why other possible
non-capital interventions would be inefficient, costly, or otherwise not
reasonably designed to remedy the specified harm without additional capital
expenditure.
(iii) An
objective comparison of the proposed capital project against alternative
capital expenditures and demonstrate why their proposed capital project is
superior to alternative capital expenditures that could be made. Applicants
shall assess the proposed capital project against at least two alternative
types or sizes of capital expenditures that are potentially effective and
reasonably feasible. Where relevant, applicants shall compare the proposed
project against the alternative of improving existing capital assets already
owned or leasing other capital assets. Applicants shall use quantitative data
when available. For each identified alternative, applicants shall provide:
(A) A comparison of the effectiveness of the
capital projects in addressing the specified harm. This comparison shall
consider the effectiveness of the capital projects in addressing the specified
harm over the useful life of the capital asset and shall consider metrics such
as the number of impacted or disproportionately impacted individuals or
entities served, when such individuals or entities are estimated to be served,
the relative time horizons of the project, and consideration of any
uncertainties or risks involved with the capital project; and
(B) A comparison of the expected total cost
of the capital projects. This comparison shall consider the expected total cost
of the capital project required to construct, purchase, install, or improve the
capital assets intended to address the specified harm. Applicants shall include
pre-development costs in their analysis and shall provide an estimate of
ongoing operational costs.
(c) Justification for rural telehealth
projects. For rural telehealth projects, the applicant shall provide:
(i) A description of the harm necessitating
the project, which shall include:
(A) A
detailed description of the specific harm to be addressed by the requested
funding;
(B) A detailed description
of how the harm was exacerbated or caused by COVID-19; and
(C) Supporting quantitative information on
the extent and type of the harm, such as the number of individuals or entities
affected.
(ii) A
description of the telehealth project, which shall include:
(A) A detailed description of the project
specifications, including the details of any infrastructure to be improved or
constructed, and the type and quantity of any equipment, software, or other
goods or services that will be purchased with grant funds;
(B) A detailed description of how the project
addresses the specified harm or need; and
(C) An explanation of how the project is a
proportional response to the specified harm, including a comparison of the
proposed project to other possible ways of addressing the specified
harm.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.