The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-1064 FISH, JEREMY V. UNITED STATESThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ____ (2005).
04-6848 FARIS, IYMAN V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-6889 KENNEDY, KARSTEN G. V. TX BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-7702 GONZALEZ, JORGE A. V. MUNICIPAL COURT, ET AL.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit for further consideration in light of Smith v. Massachusetts, 543 U. S. _____ (2005).
04-8295 PRUITT, CRAIG A. V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8479 BUFFINGTON, BEN V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8490 COATES, ALLEN D. V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8492 PEREZ, JOSE A. R. V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8495 BRETON-PICHARDO, JOSE V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8507 MARANA, ROSA M. V. UNITED STATESThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8529 BERWICK, CRISTOPHER V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8537 MACIAS-LUNA, HUMBERTO V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8538 LIZARRAGA-ORDUNO, JOSE R. V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8541 STOKES, RONALD A. X. V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8542 SATTERFIELD, MICHAEL S. V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8550 CIFUENTES-CAYCEDO, IVAN R. V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8585 HANNA, JESSIE V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8589 GUTIERREZ-AGUINIGA, EDUARDO V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8591 WEAKS, TYRONE J. V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8599 RICE, ANDRE V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8601 McTIZIC, PAULETTE V. UNITED STATESThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8631 PADILLA, VICTOR V. UNITED STATESThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8652 CARRILLO-BANUELOS, AGUSTIN V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005).
04-8705 GIGLIO, JUDITH V. UNITED STATESThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. _____ (2005). ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
04M58 CURTO, PATRICIA J. V. ROTH, NELSON, ET AL.The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.
04-7160 IN RE REGINA BLEDSOEThe motions of petitioners for reconsideration of orders denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied.
04-8116 S. C., ET VIR V. R. Y., ET UX.The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioners are allowed until April 11, 2005, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. CERTIORARI DENIED
04-38 MILLER, SHANNON V. UNITED STATESThe petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
04-787 QUALCHOICE, INC. V. ROWLAND, ROBINThe motion of Trover Solutions for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
04-935 SOUTH CAROLINA V. MICHAEL H.The motions of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
04-8218 REED, KENNETH W. V. ARIZONA, ET AL.The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
04-8638 CHUN, IN SOO V. BUSH, FORMER PRESIDENT OF U.S.The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied. HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
04-1119 IN RE HENRY J. BORELLIThe petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied. REHEARINGS DENIED
03-9560 HOWELL, MARLON L. V. MISSISSIPPIThe petitions for rehearing are denied.
03-10346 WALKER, SHARMAN V. UNITED STATESThe motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing is denied.
Adrian Palmer Ifill, of Washington, District of Columbia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 10, 2005; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Adrian Palmer Ifill is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2388 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALLAN JAMES CULVER, JR.Allan James Culver, Jr., of Baltimore, Maryland, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 10, 2005; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Allan James Culver, Jr. is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2391 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEORGE GUYER YOUNG, III.George Guyer Young, III., of Havertown, Pennsylvania, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 10, 2005; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that George Guyer Young, III. is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2392 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH PHILIP WEBBERJoseph Philip Webber, of Baltimore, Maryland, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 10, 2005; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Joseph Philip Webber is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2393 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARK DAVID FRANKELMark David Frankel, of York, Pennsylvania, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 10, 2005; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Mark David Frankel is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2394 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ELLIS HOWARD GOODMANEllis Howard Goodman, of Baltimore, Maryland, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 10, 2005; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Ellis Howard Goodman is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2418 IN THE MATTER OF DONALD ELIAS GEORGEDonald Elias George, of Akron, Ohio, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys permitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on February 22, 2005, is discharged.