CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of South Carolina for further consideration in light of Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zavdydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Federal Election Comm’n v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of AARP for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, for further consideration in light of Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner is denied.

The motion of the River Master for fees and expenses is granted, and the River Master is granted a total of $2,645.00 for the period January 1 — March 31, 2001, to be paid equally by the parties.

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

argument is granted. The motion of BellSouth Corporation, et al., for additional time for oral argument is granted. Thirty additional minutes are allotted for that purpose to be divided as follows: 45

for the Solicitor General. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Commission for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of the Solicitor General for additional time for oral argument and for divided argument is granted and ten additional minutes are allotted for oral argument to be divided as follows: 20

Solicitor General. The request for divided rebuttal is denied.

The motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted.

argument is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument are granted.

The motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that Victoria A. Brambl, Esq., of Tucson, Arizona, is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.

(00A1064) The application for stay addressed to Justice Breyer and referred to the Court is denied.

The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied. Petitioners are allowed until July 20, 2001, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

The motion of National Association of Insurance Commissioners for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following question: "Whether the Court of Appeals properly determined that a temporary moratorium on land development does not constitute a taking of property requiring compensation under the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution?"

CERTIORARI DENIED

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

The motion of Committee on State Taxation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The motion of Attorney General of Michigan for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The motion of Cingular Wireless LLC, Salmon PCSLL, and Verizon for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The motion of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

MANDAMUS DENIED

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

The motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing is denied.

RECESS ORDER

The Court will take a recess from today until Monday, October 1, 2001.