Syllabus | Opinion [ OConnor ] | Concurrence [ Ginsburg ] | Dissent [ Stevens ] |
---|---|---|---|
HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version |
LANCE RAYGOR and JAMES GOODCHILD, PETITIONERS v. REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA et al.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF MINNESOTA
[February 27, 2002]
Justice Ginsburg, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
I join the Courts judgment and its opinion in principal part. I agree with the decisions twin rulings. First, prevailing precedent supports the view that, in the absence of a clear statement of congressional intent to abrogate the States Eleventh Amendment immunity, 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a)s extension of federal jurisdiction does not reach claims against nonconsenting state defendants. See ante, at 67. Second, absent affirmative indicatio[n] by Congress, see Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765, 787 (2000), §1367(d)s tolling provision does not reach claims asserted, but not maintainable, under §1367(a) against nonconsenting state defendants. See ante, at 711.
The pathmarking decision, it appears to me, is Vermont Agency.1 There, the Court declined to read the word person, for purposes of qui tam liability, to include a nonconsenting State. Bolstering the Courts conclusion in Vermont Agency were the two reinforcements pivotal here: first,
Notes
1. This Courts majority, in contrast to the Minnesota Supreme Court, does not invoke Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999), in support of todays decision. I joined the dissent in Alden and, in a suitable case, would join a call to reexamine that decision. Cf. post, at 67 (Stevens, J., dissenting).
2. The supplemental jurisdiction statute, well-reasoned commentary indicates, is clearly flawed and needs repair. Oakley, Prospectus for the American Law Institutes Federal Judicial Code Revision Project, 31 U. C. D. L. Rev. 855, 936 (1998); see generally id., at 936945 (canvassing problems with 28 U.S.C. § 1367). For a proposed repair of §1367, see ALI, Federal Judicial Code Revision Project (Tent. Draft No. 2, Apr. 14, 1998).