(1)
Compliance with the laws relating to citrus products shall be determined by one
or more of the methods and analyses described in the following sections. All
materials and publications indicated are incorporated by reference into the
rules.
(2) For Acid Content:
(a) Fresh Fruit:
1. In the manner described in the "Method for
Determination of Acid", Florida Department of Citrus (February 1990).
3. In the manner described by Florida
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Fruit and
Vegetables method "Determination of Soluble Solids and Anhydrous Citric Acid in
Citrus Fruit at Processing Plants." (February 1990)
(b) Processed Citrus Products:
1. In the manner prescribed in Sections 6.1.1
through 6.1.16 of the Citrus Handbook issued by the United States Department of
Agriculture, March 1993.
2. In the
manner prescribed in the United States Standards for Grades of Orange Juice in
7 CFR Part
52 and
48 Federal Register 40875
(1983).
(3) For
Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C):
(a) As prescribed
in the Fifteenth Edition (1990) of Official Methods of Analysis of the
Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Section 43.068 under method number
967.21 "Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid) in Vitamin Preparations and Juices 2,
6-Dichloroindolpenol Titrimetric Method, Final Actions."
(b) As prescribed in "Liquid Chromatographic
Determination of Vitamin C in Commercial Florida Citrus Juices, " H.S. Lee and
G.A. Coates, 1987, Journal of Micronutrient Analysis, Vol. 3, pages
199-209.
(4) For Break in
Color: As prescribed by Department of Citrus Rules 20-34.003 through
20-34.005, F.A.C.
(5) For Color Grading for Processed Citrus
Products:
(a) As prescribed by Rules
20-65.001 through
20-65.005, F.A.C., and the Rules
of the State of Florida, Department of Citrus.
(b) As prescribed in Sections 6.5.1 through
6.5.31 of the Citrus Handbook issued by the United States Department of
Agriculture, March 1993.
(c) In the
manner prescribed in the United States Standards for Grades of Orange Juices
and Grapefruit Juices in 7 CFR Part
52 and
48 Federal Register 40875
(1983).
(6) For Brix
Determination:
(a) As prescribed in Sections
6.4.1 through 6.4.9 of the Citrus Handbook issued by the United States
Department of Agriculture, March 1993.
(b) In the manner prescribed in the United
States Standards for Grades of Orange Juices and Grapefruit Juices in 7 CFR
Part
52 and
48 Federal Register 40875 (1983).
(7) For Flavor:
(a) As prescribed in Section 3.1.20 to 3.1.21
and 3.2.19 to 3.2.20 of the Citrus Handbook issued by the United States
Department of Agriculture, October 1991.
(b) As prescribed in "Hedonic Scale Method of
Measuring Food Preferences. Methodology of Sensory Testing" D.R. Peryan and
F.J. Pilgrim, 1957, Food Technology Symposium, Vol. 11, pages 472-473 (Insert
Pages 9-14).
(c) In the manner
prescribed in the United States Standards for Grades of Orange Juices and
Grapefruit Juices in 7 CFR Part
52 and
48 Federal Register 40875
(1983).
(8) For Gelation:
As prescribed in Sections 6.13.1 through 6.13.4, of the Citrus Handbook issued
by the United States Department of Agriculture, March 1993.
(9) For Juice Content:
(b) As prescribed in "Direction for Making
Field Tests for Maturity of Oranges or Tangerines." Florida Department of
Citrus (February 1990).
(c) As
described in Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division
of Fruit and Vegetables, "Method for Making Maturity Tests" (February
1990).
(10) For Limonin:
(a) As prescribed in "Determination of
Limonin and Related Limonoids in Citrus Juices by High Performance Liquid
Chromatography, " Russell L. Rouseff and James F. Fisher, 1980 Analytical
Chemistry, Vol. 52, No. 8, pages 1228-1233.
(b) As prescribed in "Improvements in the
Quantitation of Limonin in Citrus Juice by Reversed-Phase High Performance
Liquid Chromatography, " W.W. Widmer, 1991, Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 8, pages 1472-1476.
(c) As prescribed by the "Enzyme Immunoassay
Test for Detection of Limonin in Citrus Juice, " Avio Systems, Idetek, Inc.,
1057 Sneath Lane, San Bruno, California 94066 (October
1989).
(11) For Naringin:
As prescribed in Sections 6.15.1 through 6.15.3 of the Citrus Handbook issued
by the United States Department of Agriculture, March 1993.
(12) For Oil Content:
(a) As prescribed in Sections 6.19.1 through
6.19.4 of the Citrus Handbook issued by the United States Department of
Agriculture, March 1993.
(b) In the
manner prescribed in the United States Standards for Grades of Orange Juices
and Grapefruit Juices in 7 CFR Part
52 and
48 Federal Register 40875
(1983).
(13) For Presence
of Concentrate in Fresh Squeezed Juices: As prescribed by "Control of
Authenticity of Fruit Juices by Isotopic Analysis, " "Jacques Bricout, 1973,
Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, " Vol. 56, No. 3,
Pages 739-742.
(14) For Presence of
Certain Preservatives or Ingredients Not Naturally Occurring in Citrus Fruit:
(a) As prescribed by "Orange Juice
Adulteration: Detection and Quality Effects of Dilution, Added Orange Pulpwash,
Turmeric and Sorbate, " D.R. Petrus, P.J. Fellers, and H.E. Anderson. 1984.
Journal of Food Science, Vol. 49 No. 6, pages 1438-1443.
(b) As prescribed in "High Performance Liquid
Chromatographic Separation and Spectral Characterization of the Pigments in
Turmeric and Annatto, " Russell L. Rouseff 1988. Journal of Food Science, Vol.
53, No. 6, pages 1823-1826.
(c) As
prescribed in "Determination of Food Preservatives in Orange Juice by
Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography, " Hyoung S. Lee, Russell L. Rouseff, and
James F. Fisher. 1986. Journal of Food Science, Vol. 51, No. 3, pages
568-570.
(15) For
Detecting Presence of Grapefruit Juice in Orange Juice: As prescribed by the
method described by R. L. Rouseff, 1988, Journal of the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists, Vol. 71, No. 4, pages 798-802.
(16) For Detection of Pulpwash (Water
Extracted Soluble Orange Solids) in Florida Orange Juice: As prescribed by the
method prescribed in the Second Supplement (1986) to the AOAC Official Methods
of Analysis, Fifteenth Edition (1990), section 22.B06-22.B12 under method
number 986.14 "Adulteration of Processed Florida Orange Juice - UV/VIS and
Florescence Spectrophotometric Methods, First Action, " and the Third
Supplement (1987) to the AOAC Official Methods of Analysis, Fourteenth Edition
(1984) revision in 22.B06-22.B12.
(17) Ratio of Solids to Acid for Processed
Juice:
(a) As prescribed by Section 6.1.1
through Section 6.1.16 of the Citrus Handbook issued by the United States
Department of Agriculture, March 1993.
(b) In the manner prescribed in United States
Standards for Grades of Orange Juices and Grapefruit Juices in 7 CFR Part
52
and
48 Federal Register 40875 (1983).
(18) Presence of Corn Syrup, Sugar-Beet
Derived Syrups and Sweetening Ingredients in Citrus Juice:
(a) As prescribed by "Citrus Fruits and Their
Products; Analysis and Technology, " S.V. Ting and R.L. Rouseff, 1986, pages
88-90. Published by Marcel Dekker, Inc., 270 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y.
10016.
(b) As prescribed by
"Application of Natural Variations in
13c/12c
Ratios to Detect Adulteration of Orange, Lemon and Apple Juices." Landis W.
Doner in Adulteration of Fruit Juice Beverages. Edited by Steven Nagy, John A.
Attaway and Martha E. Rhodes, 1988, pages 125-138. Published by Marcel Dekker,
Inc., 270 Madison Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10016.
(c) As prescribed by the "Carbon Ratio Mass
Spectrometric Method" prescribed in the AOAC Official Methods of Analysis,
Fifteenth Edition (1990), Sections 22.113-22.116 under method number 982.21
"Corn Syrup in Orange Juice - Carbon Ratio Mass Spectrometric Method, Final
Action."
(19) Pulp
Content: As prescribed by Sections 6.16.1 through 6.16.4 of the Citrus Handbook
issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, March 1993.
(20) Viscosity: As prescribed in "Procedures
for Analysis - Citrus Products, " Revision No. 6, September 1983. Research and
Technical Service Department, FMC Corporation, Citrus Machinery Division,
Lakeland, Florida.
(21) Foreign
Material: As prescribed by Sections 6.12.1 through 6.12.3 of the Citrus
Handbook issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, March
1993.
(22) For Certain
Adulteration: As prescribed by "Detection of Citrus Fruit Adulteration Using
the Distribution of Natural Stable Isotopes."
A. Nissenbaum, A. Lifshitz and Y. Stepek,
1974, Lebensmittel Wissenschafter Technologie, Vol. 7, No. 3, pages
152-154.
(23) Defining
Geographical Origin and Detecting Adulteration of Orange Juice: As prescribed
by "Trace Metals: Defining Geographical Origin and Detecting Adulteration of
Orange Juice." Seifollah Nikdel, Steven Nagy, and John A. Attaway in
Adulteration of Fruit Juice Beverages. Edited by Steven Nagy, John A. Attaway
and Martha E. Rhodes. 1988, pages 81-105. Published by Marcel Dekker, Inc. 270
Madison Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10016.
(24) TBZ and Benomyl:
(a) In manner described by Florida Department
of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Fruit and Vegetables method
"TBZ and Benomyl for Spectrophotometric Measurement." (February 1990)
(b) As prescribed by Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Fruit and Vegetables method,
"Method for TBZ and Benomyl by HPLC." (February 1990)
(25) Dowicide and Diphenyl:
(a) As prescribed by Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Fruit and Vegetables method
"Dowicide by Florescence and Diphenyl by HPLC." (February 1990).
(b) As prescribed by Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Fruit and Vegetables method,
"Dowicide and Diphenyl by HPLC." (February 1990)
(c) As prescribed by Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Fruit and Vegetables method
"Dowicide and Diphenyl by GLC." (February 1990)
(d) As prescribed in "High Speed Liquid
Chromatographic Determination of O-Phenylphenol Residues in Citrus Products, "
Samuel K. Reeder, 1976, Journal of the Association of Official Analytical
Chemists, Vol. 59, No. 1, pages 162-164.
(26) Determination of Imazalil in Whole
Fruit: As prescribed in "Determination of Imazalil in Whole Fruit." Pennwalt
Corp., Decco Lab, Munrovia, CA.
(27) Curcumin in Orange Juice Product: As
prescribed in Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division
of Fruit and Vegetables method, "Detection of Curcumin in FCOJ and OM with
Fluorescence Spectrophotometer." (February 1990)
(28) Aldicarb Residues: As prescribed in "A
Method for the Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Citrus Fruit,
" October 1978, Union Carbide Corporation, Agricultural Products Research and
Development Department, South Charleston, West Virginia 25303.
(29) Sodium Benzoate:
(a) As prescribed by "High-Performance Liquid
Chromatographic Determination of Sodium Benzoate when used as a Tracer to
Detect Pulpwash Adulteration of Orange Juice, " by Dr. James F. Fisher, 1983,
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol. 31, No. 66, pages
66-68.
(b) As prescribed by "Liquid
Chromatographic Determination of Benzoic Acid in Orange Juice: Interlaboratory
Study, " Hyoung S. Lee, 1995, Journal of AOAC International, Vol. 78, No. 1,
pages 80-82.
(30) For
Determining Grades for Fresh Florida Citrus Fruit: As prescribed in USDA
Standards for Grades of Florida Grapefruit, Oranges and Tangelos, 45 Federal
Register 72089 (1980).
(31) Arsenic
Residues: As prescribed in "Silver Diethyldithiocarbamate Method, AOAC Official
Methods of Analysis". Twelfth Edition (1975), pages 428-430.
(32) Pesticide Residues: Pesticide Analytical
Manual, Vol. I & II U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Food
& Drug Administration (Revised 1989).
(33) Sugar in Citrus Juices: As prescribed in
"Natural Isotope Fractionation in the Discrimination of Sugar Origins" G. J.
Martin, D. Danho and C. Vallet, 1991, Journal of the Science of Food and
Agriculture, Vol. 56, pages 419-434.
(34) Beet Medium Invert Sugar in Citrus
Juices: As prescribed in "Detection of Orange Juice Adulteration with Beet
Medium Invert Sugar Using Anion-Exchange Liquid Chromatography with Pulsed
Amperiometric Detection, " K. W. Swallow, N. H. Low, and D. R. Petrus, 1991,
Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Vol. 74, No. 2,
pages 341-345.
(35) Sodium: As
prescribed in "Sodium in Fruit and Fruit Products, Flame Spectrophotometric
Method, AOAC Official Methods of Analysis", Chapter 37, Page 7
(1995).
(36)
Salmonella:
(a) As prescribed
in FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, "Salmonella Culture
Method for Pasteurized and Unpasteurized Orange Juice", Wallace H. Andrews,
Geraldine A. June, Patricia S. Sherrod, Thomas S. Hammack, and R. Miguel
Amaguana, 8th Edition, Revision A, 1998, Chapter 5, Revisions December,
1999.
(b) As prescribed in AOAC
Official Methods of Analysis, 16th Ed. Section 17.9.13, AOAC Official Method
989.14, "Salmonella in Foods, Colorimetric Polyclonal Enzyme
Immunoassay, " Denis Hughes, Angela E. Dailianis, Louise Hill, Michael S.
Curiale and Vidhya Gangar, Journal of AOAC International, Vol. 82, No. 3, Pages
634-647, 1999.
(37)
E. coli:
(a) As prescribed in
FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Broth MPN Method "Escherichia
coli and the Coliform Bacteria, Anthony D. Hitchins, Peter Feng,
William D. Watkins, Scott R. Rippey, and Linda A. Chandler, 8th Ed., Chapter 4,
1995.
(b) As prescribed in AOAC
Official Methods of Analysis, AOAC Official Method 991.14, "Dry Rehydratable
Film for Enumeratin of Total Coliforms and Escherischia coli
in Foods: Collaborative Study", Michael S. Curiale, Therese Sons, Dawn McIver,
J. Sue McCallister, Barbara Halsey, Diane Roblee, and Terrance L. Fox, Journal
of AOAC, Vol 74, No. 4, 1991.
(c)
As prescribed in AOAC Official Methods of Analysis, AOAC Official Method
996.09, "Visual Immunoprecipitate Assay (VIP) for Detection of
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in Selected Foods:
Collaborative Study" Philip T. Feldsine, Maria T. Falbo-Nelson, Sharol L.
Brunelle, and Robin L. Forgey, Journal of AOAC, Vol 80, No. 3,
1997.
(38) Additional
methods and analyses shall be those that achieve at least "First Action" status
as an AOAC Official Method, or are introduced through expert testimony, opinion
and other relevant evidence where the trier of fact determines that the
testimony, evidence or opinion is otherwise admissible under Florida
law.
(39) If one of the test
methods in this section is used in an administrative or judicial enforcement
proceeding, then, in addition to its rights to challenge the legal validity of
the rule, the respondent or defendant may, in its defense, present competent
substantial evidence relating to the accuracy or scientific validity of the
test results, the test method, or both. Only if the respondent or defendant
fails to present such evidence, shall such accuracy, scientific validity, or
both, be presumed.