(i) It exhibits any of
the characteristics of hazardous waste identified in Sections
R315-261-20
through 24. However, any mixture of a waste from the extraction, beneficiation,
and processing of ores and minerals excluded under Subsection
R315-261-4(b)(7)
and any other solid waste exhibiting a characteristic of hazardous waste under
Sections
R315-261-20
through 24 is a hazardous waste only if it exhibits a characteristic that would
not have been exhibited by the excluded waste alone if such mixture had not
occurred, or if it continues to exhibit any of the characteristics exhibited by
the non-excluded wastes prior to mixture. Further, for the purposes of applying
the Toxicity Characteristic to such mixtures, the mixture is also a hazardous
waste if it exceeds the maximum concentration for any contaminant listed in
table 1 to Section
R315-261-24
that would not have been exceeded by the excluded waste alone if the mixture
had not occurred or if it continues to exceed the maximum concentration for any
contaminant exceeded by the nonexempt waste prior to mixture.
(iv) It is a mixture of solid waste and one
or more hazardous wastes listed in Sections
R315-261-30
through 35 and has not been excluded from Subsection R315-261-3(a)(2) under
Sections
R315-260-20
and
R315-260-22,
Subsection R315-261-3(g), or Subsection R315-261-3(h); however, the following
mixtures of solid wastes and hazardous wastes listed in Sections
R315-261-30
through 35 are not hazardous wastes, except by application of Subsections
R315-261-3(a)(2)(i) or (ii), if the generator can demonstrate that the mixture
consists of wastewater the discharge of which is subject to regulation under
either section 402 or section 307(b) of the Clean Water Act,including
wastewater at facilities which have eliminated the discharge of wastewater,
and;
(A) One or more of the following spent
solvents listed in Section
R315-261-31:
benzene, carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene or the
scrubber waters derived-from the combustion of these spent solvents-Provided,
That the maximum total weekly usage of these solvents, other than the amounts
that can be demonstrated not to be discharged to wastewater, divided by the
average weekly flow of wastewater into the headworks of the facility's
wastewater treatment or pretreatment system does not exceed 1 part per million,
or the total measured concentration of these solvents entering the headworks of
the facility's wastewater treatment system, at facilities subject to regulation
under the Utah Air Conservation Act, or at facilities subject to an enforceable
limit in a federal operating permit that minimizes fugitive emissions, does not
exceed 1 part per million on an average weekly basis. Any facility that uses
benzene as a solvent and claims this exemption shall use an aerated biological
wastewater treatment system and shall use only lined surface impoundments or
tanks prior to secondary clarification in the wastewater treatment system.
Facilities that choose to measure concentration levels shall file a copy of
their sampling and analysis plan with the Director. A facility shall file a
copy of a revised sampling and analysis plan only if the initial plan is
rendered inaccurate by changes in the facility's operations. The sampling and
analysis plan shall include the monitoring point location (headworks), the
sampling frequency and methodology, and a list of constituents to be monitored.
A facility is eligible for the direct monitoring option once they receive
confirmation that the sampling and analysis plan has been received by the
Director. The Director may reject the sampling and analysis plan if the
Director finds that, the sampling and analysis plan fails to include the above
information; or the plan parameters would not enable the facility to calculate
the weekly average concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the Director
rejects the sampling and analysis plan or if the Director finds that the
facility is not following the sampling and analysis plan, the Director shall
notify the facility to cease the use of the direct monitoring option until such
time as the bases for rejection are corrected; or
(B) One or more of the following spent
solvents listed in Section
R315-261-31:
methylene chloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, chlorobenzene, o-dichlorobenzene,
cresols, cresylic acid, nitrobenzene, toluene, methyl ethyl ketone, carbon
disulfide, isobutanol, pyridine, spent chlorofluorocarbon solvents,
2-ethoxyethanol, or the scrubber waters derived-from the combustion of these
spent solvents-Provided That the maximum total weekly usage of these solvents,
other than the amounts that can be demonstrated not to be discharged to
wastewater, divided by the average weekly flow of wastewater into the headworks
of the facility's wastewater treatment or pretreatment system does not exceed
25 parts per million, or the total measured concentration of these solvents
entering the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment system; at
facilities subject to regulation under the Utah Air Conservation Act, or at
facilities subject to an enforceable limit in a federal operating permit that
minimizes fugitive emissions; does not exceed 25 parts per million on an
average weekly basis. Facilities that choose to measure concentration levels
shall file a copy of their sampling and analysis plan with the Director. A
facility shall file a copy of a revised sampling and analysis plan only if the
initial plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the facility's operations.
The sampling and analysis plan shall include the monitoring point location
(headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology, and a list of constituents
to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the direct monitoring option once
they receive confirmation that the sampling and analysis plan has been received
by the Director. The Director may reject the sampling and analysis plan if the
Director finds that, the sampling and analysis plan fails to include the above
information; or the plan parameters would not enable the facility to calculate
the weekly average concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the Director
rejects the sampling and analysis plan or if the Director finds that the
facility is not following the sampling and analysis plan, the Director shall
notify the facility to cease the use of the direct monitoring option until such
time as the bases for rejection are corrected; or
(C) One of the following wastes listed in
Section
R315-261-32,
provided that the wastes are discharged to the refinery oil recovery sewer
before primary oil/water/solids separation-heat exchanger bundle cleaning
sludge from the petroleum refining industry, EPA Hazardous Waste No. K050;
crude oil storage tank sediment from petroleum refining operations, EPA
Hazardous Waste No. K169; clarified slurry oil tank sediment and/or in-line
filter/separation solids from petroleum refining operations, EPA Hazardous
Waste No. K170; spent hydrotreating catalyst, EPA Hazardous Waste No. K171; and
spent hydrorefining catalyst, EPA Hazardous Waste No. K172; or
(D) A discarded hazardous waste, commercial
chemical product, or chemical intermediate listed in Sections
R315-261-31
through
R315-261-33,
arising from de minimis losses of these materials. For purposes of this
Subsection R315-261-3(a)(2)(iv)(D), de minimis losses are inadvertent releases
to a wastewater treatment system, including those from normal material handling
operations, e.g., spills from the unloading or transfer of materials from bins
or other containers, leaks from pipes, valves or other devices used to transfer
materials; minor leaks of process equipment, storage tanks or containers; leaks
from well maintained pump packings and seals; sample purgings; relief device
discharges; discharges from safety showers and rinsing and cleaning of personal
safety equipment; and rinsate from empty containers or from containers that are
rendered empty by that rinsing. Any manufacturing facility that claims an
exemption for de minimis quantities of wastes listed in Sections
R315-261-31
through
R315-261-32,
or any nonmanufacturing facility that claims an exemption for de minimis
quantities of wastes listed in Sections
R315-261-30
through 35 shall either have eliminated the discharge of wastewaters or have
included in its Clean Water Act permit application or submission to its
pretreatment control authority the constituents for which each waste was listed
in Rule R315-261 appendix VII; and the constituents in the table "Treatment
Standards for Hazardous Wastes" in Section
R315-268-40
for which each waste has a treatment standard (i.e., Land Disposal Restriction
constituents). A facility is eligible to claim the exemption once the permit
writer or control authority has been notified of possible de minimis releases
via the Clean Water Act permit application or the pretreatment control
authority submission. A copy of the Clean Water permit application or the
submission to the pretreatment control authority shall be placed in the
facility's on-site files; or
(E)
Wastewater resulting from laboratory operations containing toxic (T) wastes
listed in Sections
R315-261-30
through 35, Provided, That the annualized average flow of laboratory wastewater
does not exceed one percent of total wastewater flow into the headworks of the
facility's wastewater treatment or pre-treatment system or provided the wastes,
combined annualized average concentration does not exceed one part per million
in the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment or pre-treatment
facility. Toxic wastes used in laboratories that are demonstrated not to be
discharged to wastewater are not to be included in this calculation; or
(F) One or more of the following
wastes listed in Section R315-261.32: wastewaters from the production of
carbamates and carbamoyl oximes, EPA Hazardous Waste No. K157 - Provided that
the maximum weekly usage of formaldehyde, methyl chloride, methylene chloride,
and triethylamine, including all amounts that cannot be demonstrated to be
reacted in the process, destroyed through treatment, or is recovered, i.e.,
what is discharged or volatilized, divided by the average weekly flow of
process wastewater prior to any dilution into the headworks of the facility's
wastewater treatment system does not exceed a total of 5 parts per million by
weight or the total measured concentration of these chemicals entering the
headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment system (at facilities subject
to regulation under the Utah Air Conservation Act, or at facilities subject to
an enforceable limit in a federal operating permit that minimizes fugitive
emissions), does not exceed 5 parts per million on an average weekly basis.
Facilities that choose to measure concentration levels shall file copy of their
sampling and analysis plan with the Director. A facility shall file a copy of a
revised sampling and analysis plan only if the initial plan is rendered
inaccurate by changes in the facility's operations. The sampling and analysis
plan shall include the monitoring point location (headworks), the sampling
frequency and methodology, and a list of constituents to be monitored. A
facility is eligible for the direct monitoring option once they receive
confirmation that the sampling and analysis plan has been received by the
Director. The Director may reject the sampling and analysis plan if the
Director finds that, the sampling and analysis plan fails to include the above
information; or the plan parameters would not enable the facility to calculate
the weekly average concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the Director
rejects the sampling and analysis plan or if the Director finds that the
facility is not following the sampling and analysis plan, the Director shall
notify the facility to cease the use of the direct monitoring option until such
time as the bases for rejection are corrected; or
(G) Wastewaters derived-from the treatment of
one or more of the following wastes listed in Section
R315-261-32:organic
waste, including heavy ends, still bottoms, light ends, spent solvents,
filtrates, and decantates, from the production of carbamates and carbamoyl
oximes, EPA Hazardous Waste No. K156. Provided, that the maximum concentration
of formaldehyde, methyl chloride, methylene chloride, and triethylamine prior
to any dilutions into the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment
system does not exceed a total of 5 milligrams per liter or the total measured
concentration of these chemicals entering the headworks of the facility's
wastewater treatment system (at facilities subject to regulation under the Utah
Air Conservation Act, or at facilities subject to an enforceable limit in a
federal operating permit that minimizes fugitive emissions), does not exceed 5
milligrams per liter on an average weekly basis. Facilities that choose to
measure concentration levels shall file copy of their sampling and analysis
plan with the Director. A facility shall file a copy of a revised sampling and
analysis plan only if the initial plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the
facility's operations. The sampling and analysis plan shall include the
monitoring point location (headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology,
and a list of constituents to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the
direct monitoring option once they receive confirmation that the sampling and
analysis plan has been received by the Director. The Director may reject the
sampling and analysis plan if the Director finds that, the sampling and
analysis plan fails to include the above information; or the plan parameters
would not enable the facility to calculate the weekly average concentration of
these chemicals accurately. If the Director rejects the sampling and analysis
plan or if the Director finds that the facility is not following the sampling
and analysis plan, the Director shall notify the facility to cease the use of
the direct monitoring option until such time as the bases for rejection are
corrected.
(v)
Rebuttable presumption for used oil. Used oil containing more than 1000 ppm
total halogens is presumed to be a hazardous waste because it has been mixed
with halogenated hazardous waste listed in Sections
R315-261-30
through 35. Persons may rebut this presumption by demonstrating that the used
oil does not contain hazardous waste; for example, to show that the used oil
does not contain significant concentrations of halogenated hazardous
constituents listed in appendix VIII of Rule R315-261.
(A) The rebuttable presumption does not apply
to metalworking oils/fluids containing chlorinated paraffins, if they are
processed, through a tolling agreement, to reclaim metalworking oils/fluids.
The presumption does apply to metalworking oils/fluids if such oils/fluids are
recycled in any other manner, or disposed.
(B) The rebuttable presumption does not apply
to used oils contaminated with chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) removed from
refrigeration units where the CFCs are destined for reclamation. The rebuttable
presumption does apply to used oils contaminated with CFCs that have been mixed
with used oil from sources other than refrigeration units.