Wash. Admin. Code § 173-340-357 - Quantitative risk assessment of cleanup action alternatives
(1)
Purpose. A cleanup action must protect human health and the
environment, including likely vulnerable populations and overburdened
communities (see WAC
173-340-360(3)(a)(i))
. A quantitative site-specific risk assessment may be conducted to help
determine whether cleanup action alternatives, including those relying on
engineered or institutional controls to limit exposure to contamination
remaining at a site, protect human health and the environment. Other methods
may be used in addition to, or instead of, a quantitative site-specific risk
assessment to determine whether a cleanup action alternative is
protective.
(2)
Human health
risk assessment. A quantitative site-specific human health risk
assessment may be conducted to help determine whether cleanup action
alternatives, including those relying on engineered or institutional controls
to limit exposure, protect human health. This subsection defines the framework
for assessing cleanup action alternatives relying on engineered or
institutional controls to limit exposure. References to Method C in this
subsection apply to an environmental medium only if the medium for which a
remediation level is being established qualifies for a Method C cleanup level
under WAC
173-340-706.
(a)
Reasonable maximum exposure.
Standard reasonable maximum exposures and corresponding Method B and C
equations in WAC
173-340-720 through
173-340-750 may be modified as
provided under WAC
173-340-708(3)(d).
For example, land uses other than residential and industrial may be used as the
basis for an alternative reasonable maximum exposure scenario for the purpose
of assessing the protectiveness of a cleanup action alternative that relies on
engineered or institutional controls (such as containment) to limit exposure to
contaminated soil.
(b)
Exposure parameters. Exposure parameters for the standard Method B
and C equations in WAC
173-340-720 through
173-340-750 may be modified as
provided in WAC
173-340-708(10).
(c)
Acceptable risk level. The
acceptable risk level used to establish a remediation level for a hazardous
substance must be the same as that used to establish the cleanup level for the
substance.
(d)
Soil to
groundwater pathway. The methods specified in WAC
173-340-747 to develop soil
concentrations that are protective of groundwater beneficial uses may also be
used to help assess whether a cleanup action alternative that relies on
engineered or institutional controls (such as containment) will protect
groundwater.
(e)
Burden of
proof, new science, and quality of information. Any modification of the
default assumptions in the standard Method B and C equations, including
modification of the standard reasonable maximum exposures and exposure
parameters, or any modification of default assumptions or methods specified in
WAC 173-340-747 requires compliance
with WAC 173-340-702(14), (15) and
(16).
(f)
Commercial gas station
scenario. At active commercial gas stations, where there are retail
sales of gasoline or diesel, one of the following may be done to demonstrate
when a cap is protective of the soil ingestion and dermal pathways:
(i) Equations 740-3 and 740-5 may be modified
by reducing the exposure frequency to 0.25. This exposure frequency is intended
to be a conservative estimate of a child trespasser scenario at a commercial
gas station where contaminated soil has been excavated and stockpiled or soil
is otherwise accessible. To rely on this exposure frequency:
(A) The cleanup action must include
institutional controls that prevent uses that could result in a higher level of
exposure; and
(B) Other exposure
pathways (e.g., soil vapors and soil to groundwater) must be assessed to
determine whether they are protective; or
(ii) Equations 740-3 and 740-5 may be
modified on a site-specific basis as described in WAC
173-340-740(3)(c).
(3)
Ecological risk assessment.
A quantitative site-specific ecological risk assessment may be used to help
determine whether cleanup action alternatives, including those relying on
engineered or institutional controls to limit exposure, protect the
environment.
Notes
Statutory Authority: Chapter 70.105D RCW. 01-05-024 (Order 97-09A), § 173-340-357, filed 2/12/01, effective 8/15/01.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.