Syllabus
|
Opinion
[Souter] |
Concurrence
[Roberts] |
Concurrence
[Alito] |
Dissent
[Thomas] |
---|---|---|---|---|
HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version |
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
WALTER A. ROTHGERY, PETITIONER v. GILLESPIE
COUNTY, TEXAS
on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit
[June 23, 2008]
Chief Justice Roberts, with whom Justice Scalia joins, concurring.
Justice Thomas’s analysis of the present issue is compelling, but I believe the result here is controlled by Brewer v. Williams, 430 U. S. 387 (1977) , and Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U. S. 625 (1986) . A sufficient case has not been made for revisiting those precedents, and accordingly I join the Court’s opinion.
I also join Justice Alito’s concurrence, which correctly distinguishes between the time the right to counsel attaches and the circumstances under which counsel must be provided.