Concurrence [ Scalia ] | Concurrence [ Thomas ] | Opinion [ White ] | Syllabus | Concurrence [ Stevens ] |
---|---|---|---|---|
HTML version WordPerfect version | HTML version WordPerfect version | HTML version WordPerfect version | HTML version WordPerfect version | HTML version WordPerfect version |
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No.
TWO PESOS, INC., PETITIONER v. TACO CABANA, INC.
on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit
[
Justice
I write separately to note my complete agreement with Justice Thomas's explanation as to how the language of § 43(a) and its common law derivation are broad enough to embrace inherently distinctive trade dress. Nevertheless, because I find that analysis to be complementary to (and not inconsistent with) the Court's opinion, I concur in the latter.