Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Part 107 Waiver Improvements
Pub. L. 118–63, title IX, § 908, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1343, provided that:
“(a) In General.—
The Administrator [of the
Federal Aviation Administration] shall adopt a performance- and risk-based approach in reviewing requests for certificates of waiver under
section 107.200 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.
“(b) Standardization of Waiver Application.—
“(1) In general.—
In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator shall improve the process to submit requests for certificates of waiver described in subsection (a).
“(2) Format.—
In carrying out paragraph (1), the Administrator may not require the use of open-ended descriptive prompts that are required to be filled out by an applicant, except to provide applicants the ability to provide the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] with information for an unusual or irregular operation.
“(3) Data.—
“(A) In general.—
In carrying out paragraph (1), the Administrator shall leverage data gathered from previous requests for certificates of waivers.
“(B) Considerations.—In carrying out subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall safely use—
“(i)
big data analytics; and
“(c) Consideration of Property Access.—
“(1) In general.—In determining whether to issue a certificate of waiver under section 107.200 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, the Administrator shall—
“(A)
consider whether the waiver applicant has control over access to all real property on the ground within the area of operation; and
“(B)
recognize and account for the safety enhancements of such controlled access.
“(2) Rule of construction.—
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to influence the extent to which the Administrator considers a lack of control over access to all real property on the ground within an area of operation as affecting the safety of an operation intended to be conducted under such
certificate of waiver.
“(d) Public Availability of Waivers.—
“(1) In general.—The Administrator shall publish all certificates of waiver issued under section 107.200 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, on the website of the FAA, including, with respect to each issued certificate of waiver—
“(A)
the terms, conditions, and limitations; and
“(B)
the class of airspace and any restrictions related to operating near
airports or heliports.
“(2) Publication.—
In carrying out paragraph (1), the Administrator shall ensure that published information is made available in a manner that prevents inappropriate disclosure of proprietary information.
“(e) Precedential Use of Previously Approved Waivers.—
“(1) Waiver approval precedent.—
If the Administrator determines, using criteria for a particular waiver, that an application for a
certificate of waiver issued under
section 107.200 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, is substantially similar (or is comprised of elements that are substantially similar) to an application for a
certificate of waiver that the Administrator has previously approved, the Administrator may streamline, as appropriate, the approval of applications for such a particular waiver.
“(2) Rule of construction.—
Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to preclude an applicant for a
certificate of waiver from applying to modify a condition or remove a limitation of such certificate.
“(f) Modification of Waivers.—
“(1) In general.—
The Administrator shall establish an expedited review process for a request to modify or renew certificates of waiver previously issued under
section 107.200 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, as appropriate.
“(2) Use of review process.—
The review process established under paragraph (1) shall be used to modify or renew certificates of waiver that cover operations that are substantially similar in all material facts to operations covered under a previously issued
certificate of waiver.”
[For definition of “certificate of waiver” as used in section 908 of Pub. L. 118–63, set out above, see section 44801 of this title, as made applicable by section 901 of Pub. L. 118–63, which is set out as a note under section 44502 of this title.]
Drone Infrastructure Inspection Grant Program
Pub. L. 118–63, title IX, § 912, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1348, provided that:
“(a) Authority.—
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act [
May 16, 2024], the Secretary [of Transportation] shall establish an
unmanned aircraft system infrastructure inspection grant program to provide grants to governmental entities to facilitate the use of small
unmanned aircraft systems to support more efficient inspection, operation, construction, maintenance, and repair of an element of critical infrastructure to improve worker safety related to projects.
“(b) Use of Grant Amounts.—A governmental entity may use a grant provided under this section to—
“(3)
contract for services performed using a small
unmanned aircraft system in circumstances in which the governmental entity does not have the resources or expertise to safely carry out or assist in carrying out the activities described under subsection (a); and
“(4)
support the program management capability of the governmental entity to use or contract the use of a small
unmanned aircraft system, as described in paragraph (3).
“(c) Application.—
To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, a governmental entity shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such form, and containing such information as the Secretary may require, including an assurance that the governmental entity or any contractor of the governmental entity, will comply with relevant Federal regulations.
“(d) Selection of Applicants.—In selecting an application for a grant under this section, the Secretary shall prioritize applications that propose to—
“(1)
carry out a project in a variety of communities, including urban, suburban, rural, Tribal, or any other type of community; and
“(2)
address a safety risk in the inspection, operation, construction, maintenance, or repair of an element of critical infrastructure.
“(e) Rule of Construction.—
Nothing in this section shall be construed to interfere with an agreement between a governmental entity and a labor union, including the requirements of
section 5333(b) of title 49,
United States Code.
“(f) Report to Congress.—Not later than 2 years after the first grant is provided under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] a report that evaluates the program carried out under this section that includes—
“(1)
a description of the number of grants provided under this section;
“(2)
the amount of each grant provided under this section;
“(3)
the activities carried out with a grant provided under this section; and
“(4)
the effectiveness of such activities in meeting the objectives described in subsection (a).
“(g) Funding.—
“(1) Federal share.—
“(A) In general.—
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Federal share of the cost of a project carried out using a grant provided under this section shall not exceed 50 percent of the total project cost.
“(B) Waiver.—The Secretary may increase the Federal share under subparagraph (A) to up to 75 percent for a project carried out using a grant provided under this section by a governmental entity if such entity—
“(i)
submits a written application to the Secretary requesting an increase in the Federal share; and
“(ii)
demonstrates that the additional assistance is necessary to facilitate the acceptance and full use of a grant under this section, such as alleviating economic hardship, meeting additional workforce needs, or any other uses that the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
“(2) Authorization of appropriations.—Out of amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 106(k) of title 49, United States Code, the following amounts are authorized to carry out this section:
“(A)
$12,000,000 for fiscal year 2025.
“(B)
$12,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.
“(C)
$12,000,000 for fiscal year 2027.
“(D)
$12,000,000 for fiscal year 2028.
“(h) Definitions.—In this section:
“(2) Element of critical infrastructure.—
The term ‘element of critical infrastructure’ means a critical infrastructure facility or asset, including public bridges, tunnels, roads, highways, dams, electric grid, water infrastructure, communication systems, pipelines, or other related facilities or assets, as determined by the Secretary.
“(3) Governmental entity.—The term ‘governmental entity’ means—
“(A)
a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, a territory of the
United States, or a political subdivision thereof;
“(B)
a unit of local government;
“(C)
a Tribal government;
“(D)
a metropolitan planning organization; or
“(E)
a consortia of more than 1 of the entities described in subparagraphs (A) through (D).
“(4) Project.—
The term ‘project’ means a project for the inspection, operation, construction, maintenance, or repair of an element of critical infrastructure, including mitigating environmental hazards to such infrastructure.”
[For definitions of terms used in section 912 of Pub. L. 118–63, set out above, see section 44801 of this title, as made applicable by section 901 of Pub. L. 118–63, which is set out as a note under section 44502 of this title.]
UAS Integration Strategy
Pub. L. 118–63, title IX, § 921, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1354, provided that:
“(a) In General.—The Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall implement the recommendations made by—
“(1)
the Comptroller General [of the
United States] to the Secretary [of Transportation] contained in the report of the
Government Accountability Office titled ‘Drones: FAA Should Improve Its Approach to Integrating Drones into the National Airspace System’, issued in January 2023 (GAO–23–105189); and
“(2)
the inspector general of the Department of Transportation to the Administrator contained in the audit report of the inspector general titled ‘FAA Made Progress Through Its UAS Integration Pilot Program, but FAA and Industry Challenges Remain To Achieve Full UAS Integration’, issued in April 2022 (Project ID: AV2022027).
“(b) Briefing.—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], and annually thereafter through 2028, the Administrator shall provide a briefing to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] that—
“(1) provides a status update on the—
“(A)
implementation of the recommendations described in subsection (a);
“(B)
implementation of statutory provisions related to
unmanned aircraft system integration under subtitle B [§§ 341–384] of title III of division B of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (
Public Law 115–254) [see Tables for classification]; and
“(C)
actions taken by the Administrator to implement recommendations related to safe integration of
unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system included in aviation rulemaking committee reports published after the date of enactment of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (
Public Law 115–254) [
Oct. 5, 2018];
“(2)
provides a description of steps taken to achieve the safe integration of such systems into the national airspace system, including milestones and performance metrics to track results;
“(3)
provides the costs of executing the integration described in paragraph (2), including any estimates of future Federal resources or investments required to complete such integration; and
“(4)
identifies any regulatory or policy changes required to execute the integration described in paragraph (2).”
[For definition of “unmanned aircraft system” as used in section 921 of Pub. L. 118–63, set out above, see section 44801 of this title, as made applicable by section 901 of Pub. L. 118–63, which is set out as a note under section 44502 of this title.]
Third-Party Service Approvals
Pub. L. 118–63, title IX, § 932, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1367, provided that:
“(a) Approval Process.—
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [
May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the
Federal Aviation Administration] shall establish procedures, which may include a rulemaking, to approve third-party service suppliers, including third-party service suppliers of
unmanned aircraft system traffic management, to support the safe integration and commercial operation of
unmanned aircraft systems.
“(b) Acceptance of Standards.—
In establishing the approval process required under subsection (a), the Administrator shall ensure that, to the maximum extent practicable, industry consensus standards, such as ASTM International Standard F3548–21, titled ‘UAS Traffic Management (
UTM) UAS Service Supplier (USS) Interoperability’, are included as an acceptable means of compliance for third-party services.
“(c) Approvals.—In establishing the approval process required under subsection (a), the Administrator shall—
“(1) define and implement criteria and conditions for the approval and oversight of third-party service suppliers that—
“(A)
could have a direct or indirect impact on air traffic services in the national airspace system; and
“(B)
require FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] oversight; and
“(2)
establish procedures by which
unmanned aircraft systems can use the capabilities and services of third-party service suppliers to support operations.
“(d) Harmonization.—
In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall seek to harmonize, to the extent practicable and advisable, any requirements and guidance for the development, use, and operation of third-party capabilities and services, including
UTM, with similar requirements and guidance of other civil aviation authorities.
“(e) Coordination.—
In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall consider any relevant information provided by the Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration regarding research and development efforts the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration may have conducted related to the use of
UTM providers.
“(f) Third-party Service Supplier Defined.—
In this section, the term ‘third-party service supplier’ means an entity other than the FAA that provides a distributed service that affects the safety or efficiency of the national airspace system, including UAS service suppliers, supplemental data service providers, and infrastructure providers, such as providers of ground-based surveillance, command-and-control, and information exchange to another party.
“(g) Rules of Construction.—
“(1) Beyond visual line of sight operations.—
Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent or prohibit beyond visual line of sight operations of
unmanned aircraft systems, or other types of operations, through the use of technologies other than third-party capabilities and services.
[For definitions of “unmanned aircraft system” and “UTM” as used in section 932 of Pub. L. 118–63, set out above, see section 44801 of this title, as made applicable by section 901 of Pub. L. 118–63, which is set out as a note under section 44502 of this title.]
Drone Advisory Committee for the 21st Century
Pub. L. 116–280, Dec. 31, 2020, 134 Stat. 3379, provided that:
“SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
“This Act may be cited as the ‘Drone Advisory Committee for the 21st Century Act’.
“SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.“It is the Sense of Congress that:
“(1)
Due to the ever-increasing use of
Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the agriculture, forestry, and rangeland sectors, as well as the inherently different uses in less populated parts of the nation, membership of the Drone Advisory Committee established by the
Federal Aviation Administration should, to the extent practicable, include direct representatives from county and tribal government, agriculture, forestry, and rangeland interests.
“(2)
Full transparency in the work of the Drone Advisory Committee is vital to ensuring the public can effectively participate and contribute to the development of sound Federal policies. The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration should, to the maximum extent practicable, ensure the work of the Drone Advisory Committee is shared with and easily accessible to the public and shall ensure transparency and openness in the manner in which the affairs of the Committee are conducted.
“SEC. 3. DRONE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP.
“(1) In general.—
The Federal Aviation Administration shall take appropriate steps to encourage direct representation of county and tribal governments as well as agriculture, forestry, rangeland sectors, and other rural interests on the Drone Advisory Committee.
“(2) Public participation.—
To the maximum extent practicable, the Administrator shall include public participation in the process of nominating individuals for membership on the Committee.”
Update of FAA Comprehensive Plan
Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 342, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3287, provided that:
“(a) In General.—
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act [
Oct. 5, 2018], the Secretary of Transportation shall update the comprehensive plan described in
section 44802 of title 49,
United States Code, to develop a concept of operations for the integration of
unmanned aircraft into the national airspace system.
“(b) Considerations.—In carrying out the update under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider, at a minimum—
“(1)
the potential use of
UTM and other technologies to ensure the safe and lawful operation of
unmanned aircraft in the national airspace system;
“(2)
the appropriate roles, responsibilities, and authorities of government agencies and the private sector in identifying and reporting unlawful or harmful operations and operators of
unmanned aircraft;
“(3)
the use of models, threat assessments, probabilities, and other methods to distinguish between lawful and unlawful operations of
unmanned aircraft; and
“(4)
appropriate systems, training, intergovernmental processes, protocols, and procedures to mitigate risks and hazards posed by unlawful or harmful operations of
unmanned aircraft systems.
“(c) Consultation.—
The Secretary shall carry out the update under subsection (a) in consultation with representatives of the aviation industry, Federal agencies that employ
unmanned aircraft systems technology in the national airspace system, and the
unmanned aircraft systems industry.
“(d) Program Alignment Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives], a report that describes a strategy to—
“(2)
leverage capabilities learned across programs;
“(3)
support the safe integration of UAS into the national airspace; and
“(4) systematically and timely implement or execute—
“(A)
commercially-operated Low Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability;
“(C)
the Unmanned Traffic Management Pilot Program.”
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Pilot Program
Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 351, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3301, provided that:
“(a) Authority.—
The Secretary of Transportation may establish a pilot program to enable enhanced drone operations as required in the
October 25, 2017 Presidential Memorandum entitled
‘Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Pilot Program’ and described in 82 Federal Register 50301 [set out below].
“(b) Applications.—
The Secretary shall accept applications from State, local, and Tribal governments, in partnership with
unmanned aircraft system operators and other private-sector stakeholders, to test and evaluate the integration of civil and public UAS operations into the low-altitude national airspace system.
“(c) Objectives.—The purpose of the pilot program is to accelerate existing UAS integration plans by working to solve technical, regulatory, and policy challenges, while enabling advanced UAS operations in select areas subject to ongoing safety oversight and cooperation between the Federal Government and applicable State, local, or Tribal jurisdictions, in order to—
“(1)
accelerate the safe integration of UAS into the NAS by testing and validating new concepts of beyond visual line of sight operations in a controlled environment, focusing on detect and avoid technologies, command and control links, navigation, weather, and human factors;
“(2)
address ongoing concerns regarding the potential security and safety risks associated with UAS operating in close proximity to human beings and critical infrastructure by ensuring that operators communicate more effectively with Federal, State, local, and Tribal law enforcement to enable law enforcement to determine if a UAS operation poses such a risk;
“(3)
promote innovation in and development of the
United States unmanned aviation industry, especially in sectors such as agriculture, emergency management, inspection, and transportation safety, in which there are significant public benefits to be gained from the deployment of UAS; and
“(4)
identify the most effective models of balancing local and national interests in UAS integration.
“(d) Application Submission.—The Secretary shall establish application requirements and require applicants to include the following information:
“(1)
Identification of the airspace to be used, including shape files and altitudes.
“(2)
Description of the types of planned operations.
“(3)
Identification of stakeholder partners to test and evaluate planned operations.
“(4)
Identification of available infrastructure to support planned operations.
“(5)
Description of experience with UAS operations and regulations.
“(6)
Description of existing UAS operator and any other stakeholder partnerships and experience.
“(7)
Description of plans to address safety, security, competition, privacy concerns, and community outreach.
“(e) Monitoring and Enforcement of Limitations.—
“(1) In general.—
Monitoring and enforcement of any limitations enacted pursuant to this pilot project shall be the responsibility of the jurisdiction.
“(2) Savings provision.—
Nothing in paragraph (1) may be construed to prevent the Secretary from enforcing Federal law.
“(3) Examples of limitations.—Limitations under this section may include—
“(A)
prohibiting flight during specified morning and evening rush hours or only permitting flight during specified hours such as daylight hours, sufficient to ensure reasonable airspace access;
“(B)
establishing designated take-off and landing zones, limiting operations over moving locations or fixed site public road[s] and parks, sidewalks or private property based on zoning density, or other land use considerations;
“(C)
requiring notice to public safety or zoning or land use authorities before operating; and
“(D)
prohibiting operations in connection with community or sporting events that do not remain in one place (for example, parades and running events).
“(f) Selection Criteria.—In making determinations, the Secretary shall evaluate whether applications meet or exceed the following criteria:
“(1)
Overall economic, geographic, and climatic diversity of the selected jurisdictions.
“(2)
Overall diversity of the proposed models of government involvement.
“(3)
Overall diversity of the UAS operations to be conducted.
“(4)
The location of critical infrastructure.
“(5)
The involvement of commercial entities in the proposal and their ability to advance objectives that may serve the public interest as a result of further integration of UAS into the NAS.
“(6)
The involvement of affected communities in, and their support for, participating in the pilot program.
“(7)
The commitment of the governments and UAS operators involved in the proposal to comply with requirements related to national defense, homeland security, and public safety and to address competition, privacy, and civil liberties concerns.
“(8) The commitment of the governments and UAS operators involved in the proposal to achieve the following policy objectives:
“(A)
Promoting innovation and economic development.
“(B)
Enhancing transportation safety.
“(C)
Enhancing workplace safety.
“(D)
Improving emergency response and search and rescue functions.
“(E)
Using radio spectrum efficiently and competitively.
“(g) Implementation.—The Secretary shall use the data collected and experience gained over the course of this pilot program to—
“(1)
identify and resolve technical challenges to UAS integration;
“(2)
address airspace use to safely and efficiently integrate all
aircraft;
“(3)
inform operational standards and procedures to improve safety (for example, detect and avoid capabilities, navigation and altitude performance, and command and control link);
“(4)
inform FAA standards that reduce the need for waivers (for example, for operations over human beings, night operations, and beyond visual line of sight); and
“(5)
address competing interests regarding UAS operational expansion, safety, security, roles and responsibilities of non-Federal Government entities, and privacy issues.
“(h) Notification.—
Prior to initiating any additional rounds of agreements with State, local, or Tribal governments as part of the pilot program established under subsection (a), the Secretary shall notify the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations in the Senate.
“(i) Sunset.—
The pilot program established under subsection (a) shall terminate 3 years after the date on which the memorandum referenced in subsection (a) is signed by the President [Oct. 25, 2017].
“(j) Savings Clause.—Nothing in this section shall affect any proposals, selections, imposition of conditions, operations, or other decisions made—
“(1)
under the pilot program developed by the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to the Presidential memorandum titled ‘
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Pilot Program’, as published in the Federal Register on
October 30, 2017 (
82 Fed. Reg. 50301); and
“(2)
prior to the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018].
“(k) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1)
The term ‘Lead Applicant’ means an eligible State, local or Tribal government that has submitted a timely application.
“(2)
The term ‘NAS’ means the low-altitude national airspace system.
Part 107 Transparency and Technology Improvements
Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 352, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3304, provided that:
“(a) Transparency.—
Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [
Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the
Federal Aviation Administration] shall publish on the FAA [
Federal Aviation Administration] website a representative sample of the safety justifications, offered by applicants for small
unmanned aircraft system waivers and airspace authorizations, that have been approved by the Administration for each regulation waived or class of airspace authorized, except that any published justification shall not reveal proprietary or commercially sensitive information.
“(b) Technology Improvements.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall revise the online waiver and certificates of authorization processes—
“(1)
to provide real time confirmation that an application filed online has been received by the Administration; and
“(2)
to provide an applicant with an opportunity to review the status of the applicant’s application.”
Emergency Exemption Process
Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 353, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3304, provided that:
“(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the use of unmanned aircraft systems by civil and public operators—
“(1)
is an increasingly important tool in response to a catastrophe, disaster, or other emergency;
“(2)
helps facilitate emergency response operations, such as firefighting and search and rescue; and
“(3)
helps facilitate post-catastrophic response operations, such as utility and infrastructure restoration efforts and the safe and prompt processing, adjustment, and payment of insurance claims.
“(b) Updates.—
The Administrator [of the
Federal Aviation Administration] shall, as necessary, update and improve the Special Government Interest process described in chapter 7 of
Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7200.23A to ensure that civil and public operators, including local law enforcement agencies and first responders, continue to use
unmanned aircraft system operations quickly and efficiently in response to a catastrophe, disaster, or other emergency.
“(c) Best Practices.—
The Administrator shall develop best practices for the use of
unmanned aircraft systems by States and localities to respond to a catastrophe, disaster, or other emergency response and recovery operation.”
Plan for Full Operational Capability of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Traffic Management
Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 376, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3314, provided that:
“(a) In General.—
In conjunction with completing the requirements of section 2208 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 [
Pub. L. 114–190] (
49 U.S.C. 40101 note [now
49 U.S.C. 44802 note]), subject to subsection (b) of this section, the Administrator [of the
Federal Aviation Administration], in coordination with the Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and in consultation with
unmanned aircraft systems industry stakeholders, shall develop a plan to allow for the implementation of
unmanned aircraft systems traffic management
(UTM) services that expand operations beyond visual line of sight, have full operational capability, and ensure the safety and security of all
aircraft.
“(b) Completion of UTM System Pilot Program.—The Administrator shall ensure that the UTM system pilot program, as established in section 2208 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 [Pub. L. 114–190] (49 U.S.C. 40101 note [now 49 U.S.C. 44802 note]), is conducted to meet the following objectives of a comprehensive UTM system by the conclusion of the pilot program:
“(1)
In cooperation with the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration and manned and
unmanned aircraft industry stakeholders, allow testing of
unmanned aircraft operations, of increasing volumes and density, in airspace above
test ranges, as such term is defined in
section 44801 of title 49,
United States Code, as well as other sites determined by the Administrator to be suitable for
UTM testing, including those locations selected under the pilot program required in the
October 25, 2017, Presidential Memorandum entitled,
‘Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Pilot Program’ and described in 82 Federal Register 50301 [set out below].
“(2)
Permit the testing of various remote identification and tracking technologies evaluated by the
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Identification and Tracking Aviation Rulemaking Committee.
“(3)
Where the particular operational environment permits, permit blanket waiver authority to allow any
unmanned aircraft approved by a
UTM system pilot program selectee to be operated under conditions currently requiring a case-by-case waiver under part 107, title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, provided that any blanket waiver addresses risks to airborne objects as well as
persons and property on the ground.
“(c) Implementation Plan Contents.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall—
“(1)
include the development of safety standards to permit, authorize, or allow the use of
UTM services, which may include the demonstration and validation of such services at the
test ranges, as defined in
section 44801 of title 49,
United States Code, or other sites as authorized by the Administrator;
“(2)
outline the roles and responsibilities of industry and government in establishing
UTM services that allow applicants to conduct commercial and noncommercial operations, recognizing the primary private sector role in the development and implementation of the Low Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability and future expanded
UTM services;
“(3) include an assessment of various components required for necessary risk reduction and mitigation in relation to the use of UTM services, including—
“(A)
remote identification of both cooperative and non-cooperative
unmanned aircraft systems in the national airspace system;
“(C)
the manner in which the
Federal Aviation Administration will conduct oversight of
UTM systems, including interfaces between
UTM service providers and air traffic control;
“(D)
the need for additional technologies to detect cooperative and non-cooperative
aircraft;
“(E) collaboration and coordination with air traffic control, or management services and technologies to ensure the safety oversight of manned and unmanned aircraft, including—
“(i)
the
Federal Aviation Administration responsibilities to collect and disseminate relevant data to
UTM service providers; and
“(ii)
data exchange protocols to share UAS operator intent, operational approvals, operational restraints, and other data necessary to ensure safety or security of the National Airspace System;
“(F)
the potential for
UTM services to manage
unmanned aircraft systems carrying either
cargo, payload, or passengers, weighing more than 55 pounds, and operating at altitudes higher than 400 feet above ground level; and
“(G)
cybersecurity protections, data integrity, and national and homeland security benefits; and
“(4) establish a process for—
“(A)
accepting applications for operation of
UTM services in the national airspace system;
“(B)
setting the standards for independent private sector validation and verification that the standards for
UTM services established pursuant to paragraph (1) enabling operations beyond visual line of sight, have been met by applicants; and
“(C)
notifying the applicant, not later than 120 days after the Administrator receives a complete application, with a written approval, disapproval, or request to modify the application.
“(d) Safety Standards.—In developing the safety standards in subsection (c)(1), the Administrator—
“(1)
shall require that
UTM services help ensure the safety of
unmanned aircraft and other
aircraft operations that occur primarily or exclusively in airspace 400 feet above ground level and below, including operations conducted under a waiver issued pursuant to subpart D of
part 107 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations;
“(2) shall consider, as appropriate—
“(A)
protection of
persons and property on the ground;
“(B)
remote identification and tracking of
aircraft;
“(C)
collision avoidance with respect to obstacles and non-cooperative
aircraft;
“(D)
deconfliction of cooperative
aircraft and integration of other relevant airspace considerations;
“(E)
right of way rules, inclusive of UAS operations;
“(F)
safe and reliable coordination between air traffic control and other systems operated in the national airspace system;
“(G)
detection of non-cooperative
aircraft;
“(H)
geographic and local factors including but not limited to terrain, buildings and structures;
“(J)
qualifications, if any, necessary to operate
UTM services; and
“(3)
may establish temporary flight restrictions or other means available such as a
certificate of waiver or authorization (COA) for demonstration and validation of
UTM services.
“(e) Revocation.—
The Administrator may revoke the permission, authorization, or approval for the operation of
UTM services if the Administrator determines that the services or its operator are no longer in compliance with applicable safety standards.
“(f) Low-risk Areas.—The Administrator shall establish expedited procedures for approval of UTM services operated in—
“(1)
airspace away from congested areas; or
“(2)
other airspace above areas in which operations of
unmanned aircraft pose low risk, as determined by the Administrator.
“(g) Consultation.—
In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall consult with other Federal agencies, as appropriate.
“(h) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that, in developing the safety standards for UTM services, the Federal Aviation Administration shall consider ongoing research and development efforts on UTM services conducted by—
“(1)
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in partnership with industry stakeholders;
“(3)
the participants in the pilot program required in the
October 25, 2017, Presidential Memorandum entitled,
‘Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Pilot Program’ and described in 82 Federal Register 50301.
“(i) Deadline.—Not later than 1 year after the date of conclusion of the UTM pilot program established in section 2208 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 [Pub. L. 114–190] (49 U.S.C. 40101 note [now 49 U.S.C. 44802 note]), the Administrator shall—
“(1)
complete the plan required by subsection (a);
“(2) submit the plan to—
“(A)
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and
“(B)
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; and
“(3)
publish the plan on a publicly accessible Internet website of the Federal Aviation Administration.”
Early Implementation of Certain UTM Services
Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 377, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3317, provided that:
“(a) In General.—
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the
Federal Aviation Administration] shall, upon request of a
UTM service provider, determine if certain
UTM services may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the implementation plan required by section 376 [set out above].
“(b) Assessment of UTM Services.—
In making the determination under subsection (a), the Administrator shall assess, at a minimum, whether the proposed
UTM services, as a result of their operational capabilities, reliability, intended use, areas of operation, and the characteristics of the
aircraft involved, will maintain the safety and efficiency of the national airspace system and address any identified risks to manned or
unmanned aircraft and
persons and property on the ground.
“(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.—
If the Administrator determines that certain
UTM services may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Administrator shall establish requirements for their safe operation in the national airspace system.
“(d) Expedited Procedures.—
The Administrator shall provide expedited procedures for making the assessment and determinations under this section where the
UTM services will be provided primarily or exclusively in airspace above areas in which the operation of
unmanned aircraft poses low risk, including but not limited to croplands and areas other than congested areas.
“(e) Consultation.—
In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall consult with other Federal agencies, as appropriate.
“(f) Preexisting UTM Services Approvals.—
Nothing in this Act [see Tables for classification] shall affect or delay approvals, waivers, or exemptions granted by the Administrator for
UTM services already in existence or approved by the Administrator prior to the date of enactment of this Act [
Oct. 5, 2018], including approvals under the Low Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability.”
Transition Language
Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 380, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3319, provided that:
“(a) Regulations.—
Notwithstanding the repeals under sections
341,
348 [probably should be “346”], 347, and 383 of this Act [repealing the provisions listed in subsec. (b)(1) to (4) below], all orders, determinations, rules, regulations, permits, grants, and contracts, which have been issued under any law described under subsection (b) of this section before the effective date of this Act [probably means
Oct. 5, 2018, the date of enactment of
Pub. L. 115–254] shall continue in effect until modified or revoked by the Secretary of Transportation, acting through the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration, as applicable, by a court of competent jurisdiction, or by operation of law other than this Act [see Tables for classification].
“(b) Laws Described.—The laws described under this subsection are as follows:
“(2)
Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (
49 U.S.C. 40101 note).
“(3)
Section 334 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (
49 U.S.C. 40101 note).
“(c) Effect on Pending Proceedings.—
This Act shall not affect administrative or judicial proceedings pending on the effective date of this Act.”
Collaboration Between Federal Aviation Administration and Department of Defense on Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, § 1092, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1610, provided that:
“(a) Collaboration.—
“(1) In general.—
The Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration and the
Secretary of Defense may collaborate on sense-and-avoid capabilities for
unmanned aircraft systems.
“(2) Elements.—The collaboration described in paragraph (1) may include, as appropriate, the following:
“(B)
The development of civil standards, policies, and procedures for the
Federal Aviation Administration for integrating
unmanned aircraft systems in the national airspace system by leveraging the historical and current testing, training, and operational experiences of the
Department of Defense, particularly the Air Force, of unmanned flight operations[.]
“(C) Informing stakeholders about—
“(ii)
research and development on
unmanned aircraft systems, especially with respect to matters involving human factors, information assurance, and security.
“(b) Participation by FAA in DOD Activities.—
“(1) In general.—
The Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration may participate, and provide assistance to the
Secretary of Defense for activities during the
test and evaluation efforts of the
Department of Defense, including the Air Force, relating to airborne and ground-based sense-and-avoid capabilities for
unmanned aircraft systems.
“(2) Participation through test sites.—
Participation under paragraph (1) may include provision of assistance through
Department of Defense unmanned aircraft systems test sites or a
Federal Aviation Administration test range.
“(d) Restoration of Rules for Registration and Marking of Unmanned Aircraft.—
The rules adopted by the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration in the matter of registration and marking requirements for
small unmanned aircraft (FAA-2015-7396; published on
December 16, 2015) that were vacated by the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Taylor v. Huerta (No. 15-1495; decided on
May 19, 2017) shall be restored to effect on the date of enactment of this Act [
Dec. 12, 2017].”
UAS Safety
Pub. L. 114–190, title II, subtitle B, July 15, 2016, 130 Stat. 628, as amended by Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, §§ 346(b)(3), 369, 383(b)(2), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3295, 3311, 3322; Pub. L. 118–63, title IX, § 929(a), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1365, provided that:
“SEC. 2201. DEFINITIONS.
“(b) FAA Modernization and Reform Act.—
“SEC. 2202. IDENTIFICATION STANDARDS.
“(a) In General.—
The Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, the President of RTCA, Inc., and the Director of the
National Institute of Standards and Technology, shall convene industry stakeholders to facilitate the development of consensus standards for remotely identifying operators and owners of
unmanned aircraft systems and associated
unmanned aircraft.
“(b) Considerations.—As part of any standards developed under subsection (a), the Administrator shall ensure the consideration of—
“(2)
appropriate requirements for different classifications of
unmanned aircraft systems operations, including public and civil; and
“(3)
the feasibility of the development and operation of a publicly accessible online database of
unmanned aircraft and the operators thereof, and any criteria for exclusion from the database.
“(c) Deadline.—
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [July 15, 2016], the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] a report on any standards developed under subsection (a).
“(d) Guidance.—
Not later than 1 year after the date on which the Administrator submits the report under subsection (c), the Administrator shall issue regulations or guidance, as appropriate, based on any standards developed under subsection (a).
“SEC. 2203. SAFETY STATEMENTS.
“(a) Required Information.—
Beginning on the date that is 1 year after the date of publication of the guidance under subsection (b)(1), a manufacturer of a
small unmanned aircraft shall make available to the owner at the time of delivery of the
small unmanned aircraft the safety statement described in subsection (b)(2).
“(b) Safety Statement.—
“(1) In general.—
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [July 15, 2016], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall issue guidance for implementing this section.
“(2) Requirements.—A safety statement required under subsection (a) shall include—
“(C)
the date that the safety statement was created or last modified; and
“(D) language approved by the Administrator regarding the following:
“(i)
A
person may operate the
small unmanned aircraft as a model
aircraft (as defined in [former] section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 [
Pub. L. 112–95] ([former]
49 U.S.C. 40101 note)) or otherwise in accordance with
Federal Aviation Administration authorization or regulation, including requirements for the completion of any applicable
airman test.
“(ii)
The definition of a model
aircraft under [former] section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ([former]
49 U.S.C. 40101 note).
“(iii)
The requirements regarding the operation of a model
aircraft under [former] section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ([former]
49 U.S.C. 40101 note).
“(iv)
The Administrator may pursue enforcement action against a
person operating model
aircraft who endangers the safety of the national airspace system.
“SEC. 2204. FACILITATING INTERAGENCY COOPERATION FOR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT AUTHORIZATION IN SUPPORT OF FIREFIGHTING OPERATIONS AND UTILITY RESTORATION.
“(a) Firefighting Operations.—
The Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration shall enter into agreements with the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, as necessary, to continue the expeditious authorization of safe
unmanned aircraft system operations in support of firefighting operations consistent with the requirements of
section 44806 of title 49,
United States Code.
“(b) Utility Restoration.—
The Administrator shall enter into agreements with the Secretary of Energy and with such other agencies or parties, including the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, as are necessary to facilitate the expeditious authorization of safe
unmanned aircraft system operations in support of service restoration efforts of utilities.
“SEC. 2205. INTERFERENCE WITH WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION, LAW ENFORCEMENT, OR EMERGENCY RESPONSE EFFORT BY OPERATION OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT.
“(b) FAA To Impose Civil Penalty.—
“(c) Clerical Amendment.—
“SEC. 2207. EMERGENCY EXEMPTION PROCESS.
“(a) In General.—
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [
July 15, 2016], the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration shall publish guidance for applications for, and procedures for the processing of, on an emergency basis, exemptions or certificates of authorization or waiver for the use of
unmanned aircraft systems by civil or public operators in response to a catastrophe, disaster, or other emergency to facilitate emergency response operations, such as firefighting, search and rescue, and utility and infrastructure restoration efforts. In processing such applications, the Administrator shall give priority to applications for
public unmanned aircraft systems engaged in emergency response activities.
“(b) Requirements.—In providing guidance under subsection (a), the Administrator shall—
“(1)
make explicit any safety requirements that must be met for the consideration of applications that include requests for beyond visual line of sight or nighttime operations, or the suspension of otherwise applicable operating restrictions, consistent with public interest and safety; and
“(2)
explicitly state the procedures for coordinating with an incident commander, if any, to ensure operations granted under procedures developed under subsection (a) do not interfere with other emergency response efforts.
“(c) Review.—
In processing applications on an emergency basis for exemptions or certificates of authorization or waiver for
unmanned aircraft systems operations in response to a catastrophe, disaster, or other emergency, the Administrator shall act on such applications as expeditiously as practicable and without requiring public notice and comment.
“SEC. 2208. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT.
“(a) Research Plan for UTM Development and Deployment.—
“(1) In general.—
The Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration (in this section referred to as the ‘Administrator’), in coordination with the Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, shall continue development of a research plan for
unmanned aircraft systems traffic management (in this section referred to as
‘UTM’) development and deployment.
“(2) Requirements.—In developing the research plan, the Administrator shall—
“(A)
identify research outcomes sought; and
“(B)
ensure the plan is consistent with existing regulatory and operational frameworks, and considers potential future regulatory and operational frameworks, for
unmanned aircraft systems in the national airspace system.
“(3) Assessment.—
The research plan shall include an assessment of the interoperability of a
UTM system with existing and potential future air traffic management systems and processes.
“(4) Deadlines.—The Administrator shall—
“(A)
initiate development of the research plan not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act [July 15, 2016]; and
“(B) not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act—
“(i)
complete the research plan;
“(ii)
submit the research plan to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; and
“(iii)
publish the research plan on the Internet Web site of the Federal Aviation Administration.
“(b) Pilot Program.—
“(1) In general.—
Not later than 90 days after the date of submission of the research plan under subsection (a)(4)(B), the Administrator, in coordination with the Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Drone Advisory Committee, the research advisory committee established by
section 44508(a) of title 49,
United States Code, and representatives of the
unmanned aircraft industry, shall establish a
UTM system pilot program.
“(2) Sunset.—
Not later than 2 years after the date of establishment of the pilot program, the Administrator shall conclude the pilot program.
“(c) Updates.—
Not later than 180 days after the date of establishment of the pilot program, and every 180 days thereafter until the date of conclusion of the pilot program, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives an update on the status and progress of the pilot program.
“SEC. 2209. APPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNATION.
“(a) Applications for Designation.—
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [
July 15, 2016], the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a process to allow applicants to petition the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration to prohibit or restrict, including temporarily, the operation of an
unmanned aircraft in close proximity to a fixed site facility.
“(b) Review Process.—
“(1) Application procedures.—
“(A) In general.—
The Administrator shall establish the procedures for the application for designation under subsection (a).
“(B) Requirements.—
The procedures shall allow operators or proprietors of fixed site facilities to apply for designation individually or collectively.
“(C) Considerations.—Only the following may be considered fixed site facilities:
“(i)
Critical infrastructure, such as energy production, transmission, distribution facilities and equipment, and railroad facilities.
“(ii)
Oil refineries and chemical facilities.
“(2) Determination.—
“(A) In general.—
The Secretary shall provide for a determination under the review process established under subsection (a) not later than 90 days after the date of application, unless the applicant is provided with written notice describing the reason for the delay.
“(B) Affirmative designations.—An affirmative designation shall outline—
“(i)
the boundaries for
unmanned aircraft operation near the fixed site facility; and
“(ii)
such other limitations that the Administrator determines may be appropriate.
“(C) Considerations.—In making a determination whether to grant or deny an application for a designation, the Administrator may consider—
“(ii)
protection of
persons and property on the ground;
“(iii)
national security; or
“(D) Opportunity for resubmission.—
If an application is denied, and the applicant can reasonably address the reason for the denial, the Administrator may allow the applicant to reapply for designation.
“(c) Public Information.—
Designations under subsection (a) shall be published by the Federal Aviation Administration on a publicly accessible website.
“(d) Savings Clause.—
Nothing in this section may be construed as prohibiting the Administrator from authorizing operation of an
aircraft, including an
unmanned aircraft system, over, under, or within a specified distance from that fixed site facility designated under subsection (b).
“(e) Deadlines.—
“(1)
Not later than March 31, 2019, the Administrator shall publish a notice of proposed rulemaking to carry out the requirements of this section.
“(2)
Not later than 12 months after publishing the notice of proposed rulemaking under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall issue a final rule.
“(f) Deadlines.—
“(1)
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 [May 16, 2024], the Administrator shall publish a notice of proposed rulemaking to carry out the requirements of this section.
“(2)
Not later than 16 months after publishing the notice of proposed rulemaking under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall issue a final rule based on the notice of proposed rulemaking published under paragraph (1).
“(g) Definition of State Prison.—
In this section, the term ‘State prison’ means an institution under State jurisdiction, including a State Department of Corrections, the primary use of which is for the confinement of individuals convicted of a felony.
“SEC. 2210. OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
“(a) In General.—Any application process established under [former] section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 [Pub. L. 112–95] ([former] 49 U.S.C. 40101 note) shall allow for a person to apply to the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to operate an unmanned aircraft system, for purposes of conducting an activity described in subsection (b)—
“(2)
during the day or at night.
“(b) Activities Described.—The activities described in this subsection are—
“(1) activities for which manned aircraft may be used to comply with Federal, State, or local laws, including—
“(A)
activities to ensure compliance with Federal or State regulatory, permit, or other requirements, including to conduct surveys associated with applications for permits for new pipeline or pipeline systems construction or maintenance or rehabilitation of existing pipelines or pipeline systems; and
“(B) activities relating to ensuring compliance with—
“(i)
parts
192 and
195 of title
49, Code of Federal Regulations; and
“(ii)
the requirements of any Federal, State, or local governmental or regulatory body, or industry best practice, pertaining to the construction, ownership, operation, maintenance, repair, or replacement of covered facilities;
“(2)
activities to inspect, repair, construct, maintain, or protect covered facilities, including for the purpose of responding to a pipeline, pipeline system, or electric energy infrastructure incident; and
“(3)
activities in response to or in preparation for a natural disaster, manmade disaster, severe weather event, or other incident beyond the control of the applicant that may cause material damage to a covered facility.
“(c) Definitions.—In this section, the following definitions apply:
“(1) Covered facility.—The term ‘covered facility’ means—
“(A)
a pipeline or pipeline system;
“(B)
an electric energy generation, transmission, or distribution facility (including a renewable electric energy facility);
“(C)
an oil or gas production, refining, or processing facility; or
“(D)
any other critical infrastructure facility.
“(d) Deadlines.—
“(1) Certification to congress.—
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [
July 15, 2016], the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of
Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the
Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the
House of Representatives] a certification that a process has been established to facilitate applications for
unmanned aircraft systems operations described in this section.
“(2) Failure to meet certification deadline.—
If the Administrator cannot provide a certification under paragraph (1), the Administrator, not later than 180 days after the deadline specified in paragraph (1), shall update the process under [former] section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 [
Pub. L. 112–95] ([former]
49 U.S.C. 40101 note) to facilitate applications for
unmanned aircraft systems operations described in this section.
“(e) Exemptions.—
In addition to the operations described in this section, the Administrator may authorize, exempt, or otherwise allow other
unmanned aircraft systems operations under [former] section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ([former]
49 U.S.C. 40101 note) that are conducted beyond the visual line of sight of the individual operating the
unmanned aircraft system or during the day or at night.
“SEC. 2211. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ROADMAP.
“SEC. 2212. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS-MANNED AIRCRAFT COLLISION RESEARCH.
“(a) Research.—The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (in this section referred to as the ‘Administrator’), in continuation of ongoing work, shall coordinate with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to develop a program to conduct comprehensive testing or modeling of unmanned aircraft systems colliding with various sized aircraft in various operational settings, as considered appropriate by the Administrator, including—
“(3)
collisions between
unmanned aircraft systems of various sizes, traveling at various speeds, and rotorcraft of various sizes, traveling at various speeds; and
“(b) Report.—
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [July 15, 2016], the Administrator shall transmit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report summarizing the costs and results of research under this section.
“SEC. 2213. PROBABILISTIC METRICS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT STUDY.
“(a) Study.—
Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [
July 15, 2016], the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academies to study the potential use of probabilistic assessments of risks by the Administration to streamline the integration of
unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system, including any research and development necessary.
“(b) Completion Date.—
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall provide the results of the study to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.”
Unmanned Aircraft Joint Training and Usage Plan
Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title X, § 1075(a), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 870, provided that:
“(1) Methods.—
The
Secretary of Defense, the
Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly develop and implement plans and procedures to review the potential of joint testing and evaluation of
unmanned aircraft equipment and systems with other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government that may serve the dual purpose of providing capabilities to the
Department of Defense to meet the future requirements of combatant commanders and domestically to strengthen international border security.
“(2) Report.—
Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 26, 2013], the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly submit to Congress a report on the status of the development of the plans and procedures required under paragraph (1), including a cost-benefit analysis of the shared expenses between the Department of Defense and other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government to support such plans.”
Interagency Collaboration
Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, § 1052(b), (c), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1935, 1936, provided that:
“(b) Interagency Collaboration.—
“(1) In general.—
The
Secretary of Defense shall collaborate with the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration and the Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration to conduct research and seek solutions to challenges associated with the safe integration of
unmanned aircraft systems into the National Airspace System in accordance with subtitle B of title III of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (
Public Law 112–95;
126 Stat. 72) [
49 U.S.C. 44802 note].
“(2) Activities in support of plan on access to national airspace for unmanned aircraft systems.—
Collaboration under paragraph (1) may include research and development of scientific and technical issues, equipment, and technology in support of the plan to safely accelerate the integration of
unmanned aircraft systems as required by subtitle B of title III of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012.
“(3) Nonduplicative efforts.—
If the Secretary of Defense determines it is in the interest of the Department of Defense, the Secretary may use existing aerospace-related laboratories, personnel, equipment, research radars, and ground facilities of the Department of Defense to avoid duplication of efforts in carrying out collaboration under paragraph (1).
“(4) Reports.—
“(A) Requirement.—The Secretary of Defense, on behalf of the UAS Executive Committee, shall annually submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the progress of research activity of the Department of Defense, including—
“(i)
progress in accomplishing the goals of the
unmanned aircraft systems research, development, and demonstration as related to the
Department of Defense Final Report to
Congress on Access to National Airspace for
Unmanned Aircraft Systems of October 2010, and any ongoing and collaborative research and development programs with the
Federal Aviation Administration and the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration;
“(ii)
estimates of long-term funding needs and details of funds expended and allocated in the budget requests of the President that support integration into the National Airspace; and
“(iii)
progress in sharing with the
Federal Aviation Administration safety operational and performance data as it relates to
unmanned aircraft system operation and the impact on the National Airspace System.
“(B) Termination.—
The requirement to submit a report under subparagraph (A) shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 2, 2013].
“(c) UAS Executive Committee Defined.—
In this section, the term ‘UAS Executive Committee’ means the National
Aeronautics and Space and [sic] Administration and the
Department of Defense–
Federal Aviation Administration executive committee described in section 1036(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 [
Pub. L. 110–417;
122 Stat. 4597] and established by the
Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration.”
Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Pub. L. 112–95, title III, subtitle B, Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 72, as amended by Pub. L. 114–190, title I, § 1102(i), title II, §§ 2201(b), 2211, July 15, 2016, 130 Stat. 618, 628, 636; Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, §§ 341(b)(2), 346(b)(2), 347(b)(2), 349(b)(2), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3287, 3295, 3296, 3300, provided that:
“SEC. 331. DEFINITIONS.“In this subtitle, the following definitions apply:
“(1) Arctic.—
The term ‘
Arctic’ means the
United States zone of the Chukchi Sea, Beaufort Sea, and Bering Sea north of the Aleutian chain.
“(7) Test range.—
“(A) In general.—
The term ‘
test range’ means a defined geographic area where research and development are conducted as authorized by the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration.
“(B) Inclusions.—
The term ‘
test range’ includes any of the 6
test ranges established by the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration under section 332(c), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this subparagraph [
July 15, 2016], and any public entity authorized by the
Federal Aviation Administration as an
unmanned aircraft system flight test center before
January 1, 2009.
“(8) Unmanned aircraft.—
The term ‘
unmanned aircraft’ means an
aircraft that is operated without the possibility of direct human intervention from within or on the
aircraft.
“(9) Unmanned aircraft system.—
The term ‘
unmanned aircraft system’ means an
unmanned aircraft and associated elements (including communication links and the components that control the
unmanned aircraft) that are required for the pilot in command to operate safely and efficiently in the national airspace system.
“SEC. 335. SAFETY STUDIES.
“The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall carry out all safety studies necessary to support the integration of unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system.
Unmanned Aerial Systems and National Airspace
Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, § 1097, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1608, provided that:
“(a) Establishment.—
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Dec. 31, 2011], the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration shall establish a program to integrate
unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system at six
test ranges.
“(b) Program Requirements.—In establishing the program under subsection (a), the Administrator shall—
“(1)
safely designate nonexclusionary airspace for integrated manned and unmanned flight operations in the national airspace system;
“(2)
develop certification standards and air traffic requirements for unmanned flight operations at
test ranges;
“(3)
coordinate with and leverage the resources of the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration;
“(5)
ensure that the program is coordinated with the Next Generation
Air Transportation System; and
“(6)
provide for verification of the safety of
unmanned aircraft systems and related navigation procedures before integration into the national airspace system.
“(c) Locations.—In determining the location of a test range for the program under subsection (a), the Administrator shall—
“(1)
take into consideration geographic and climatic diversity;
“(2)
take into consideration the location of ground infrastructure and research needs; and
“(3)
consult with the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
“(d) Test Range Operation.—
A project at a
test range shall be operational not later than 180 days after the date on which the project is established.
“(e) Report.—
Not later than 90 days after the date of completing each of the pilot projects, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report setting forth the Administrator’s findings and conclusions concerning the projects that includes a description and assessment of the progress being made in establishing special use airspace to fill the immediate need of the
Department of Defense to develop detection techniques for small
unmanned aircraft systems and to validate sensor integration and operation of
unmanned aircraft systems.
“(f) Duration.—
The program under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 31, 2011].
“(g) Definition.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—
“(A)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives; and
“(B)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
“(2)
The term ‘
test range’ means a defined geographic area where research and development are conducted.”
Promoting Economic Competitiveness While Safeguarding Privacy, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties in Domestic Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Memorandum of President of the United States, Feb. 15, 2015, 80 F.R. 9355, provided:
Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) technology continues to improve rapidly, and increasingly UAS are able to perform a variety of missions with greater operational flexibility and at a lower cost than comparable manned aircraft. A wide spectrum of domestic users—including industry, private citizens, and Federal, State, local, tribal, and territorial governments—are using or expect to use these systems, which may play a transformative role in fields as diverse as urban infrastructure management, farming, public safety, coastal security, military training, search and rescue, and disaster response.
The Congress recognized the potential wide-ranging benefits of UAS operations within the United States in the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–95), which requires a plan to safely integrate civil UAS into the National Airspace System (NAS) by September 30, 2015. As compared to manned aircraft, UAS may provide lower-cost operation and augment existing capabilities while reducing risks to human life. Estimates suggest the positive economic impact to U.S. industry of the integration of UAS into the NAS could be substantial and likely will grow for the foreseeable future.
As UAS are integrated into the NAS, the Federal Government will take steps to ensure that the integration takes into account not only our economic competitiveness and public safety, but also the privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties concerns these systems may raise.
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish transparent principles that govern the Federal Government’s use of UAS in the NAS, and to promote the responsible use of this technology in the private and commercial sectors, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. UAS Policies and Procedures for Federal Government Use. The Federal Government currently operates UAS in the United States for several purposes, including to manage Federal lands, monitor wildfires, conduct scientific research, monitor our borders, support law enforcement, and effectively train our military. As with information collected by the Federal Government using any technology, where UAS is the platform for collection, information must be collected, used, retained, and disseminated consistent with the Constitution, Federal law, and other applicable regulations and policies. Agencies must, for example, comply with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) (the “Privacy Act”), which, among other things, restricts the collection and dissemination of individuals’ information that is maintained in systems of records, including personally identifiable information (PII), and permits individuals to seek access to and amendment of records.
(a) Privacy Protections. Particularly in light of the diverse potential uses of UAS in the NAS, expected advancements in UAS technologies, and the anticipated increase in UAS use in the future, the Federal Government shall take steps to ensure that privacy protections and policies relative to UAS continue to keep pace with these developments. Accordingly, agencies shall, prior to deployment of new UAS technology and at least every 3 years, examine their existing UAS policies and procedures relating to the collection, use, retention, and dissemination of information obtained by UAS, to ensure that privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties are protected. Agencies shall update their policies and procedures, or issue new policies and procedures, as necessary. In addition to requiring compliance with the Privacy Act in applicable circumstances, agencies that collect information through UAS in the NAS shall ensure that their policies and procedures with respect to such information incorporate the following requirements:
(i) Collection and Use. Agencies shall only collect information using UAS, or use UAS-collected information, to the extent that such collection or use is consistent with and relevant to an authorized purpose.
(ii) Retention. Information collected using UAS that may contain PII shall not be retained for more than 180 days unless retention of the information is determined to be necessary to an authorized mission of the retaining agency, is maintained in a system of records covered by the Privacy Act, or is required to be retained for a longer period by any other applicable law or regulation.
(iii) Dissemination. UAS-collected information that is not maintained in a system of records covered by the Privacy Act shall not be disseminated outside of the agency unless dissemination is required by law, or fulfills an authorized purpose and complies with agency requirements.
(b) Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Protections. To protect civil rights and civil liberties, agencies shall:
(i) ensure that policies are in place to prohibit the collection, use, retention, or dissemination of data in any manner that would violate the First Amendment or in any manner that would discriminate against persons based upon their ethnicity, race, gender, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity, in violation of law;
(ii) ensure that UAS activities are performed in a manner consistent with the Constitution and applicable laws, Executive Orders, and other Presidential directives; and
(iii) ensure that adequate procedures are in place to receive, investigate, and address, as appropriate, privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties complaints.
(c) Accountability. To provide for effective oversight, agencies shall:
(i) ensure that oversight procedures for agencies’ UAS use, including audits or assessments, comply with existing agency policies and regulations;
(ii) verify the existence of rules of conduct and training for Federal Government personnel and contractors who work on UAS programs, and procedures for reporting suspected cases of misuse or abuse of UAS technologies;
(iii) establish policies and procedures, or confirm that policies and procedures are in place, that provide meaningful oversight of individuals who have access to sensitive information (including any PII) collected using UAS;
(iv) ensure that any data-sharing agreements or policies, data use policies, and record management policies applicable to UAS conform to applicable laws, regulations, and policies;
(v) establish policies and procedures, or confirm that policies and procedures are in place, to authorize the use of UAS in response to a request for UAS assistance in support of Federal, State, local, tribal, or territorial government operations; and
(vi) require that State, local, tribal, and territorial government recipients of Federal grant funding for the purchase or use of UAS for their own operations have in place policies and procedures to safeguard individuals’ privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties prior to expending such funds.
(d) Transparency. To promote transparency about their UAS activities within the NAS, agencies that use UAS shall, while not revealing information that could reasonably be expected to compromise law enforcement or national security:
(i) provide notice to the public regarding where the agency’s UAS are authorized to operate in the NAS;
(ii) keep the public informed about the agency’s UAS program as well as changes that would significantly affect privacy, civil rights, or civil liberties; and
(iii) make available to the public, on an annual basis, a general summary of the agency’s UAS operations during the previous fiscal year, to include a brief description of types or categories of missions flown, and the number of times the agency provided assistance to other agencies, or to State, local, tribal, or territorial governments.
(e) Reports. Within 180 days of the date of this memorandum, agencies shall provide the President with a status report on the implementation of this section. Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum, agencies shall publish information on how to access their publicly available policies and procedures implementing this section.
Sec. 2. Multi-stakeholder Engagement Process. In addition to the Federal uses of UAS described in section 1 of this memorandum, the combination of greater operational flexibility, lower capital requirements, and lower operating costs could allow UAS to be a transformative technology in the commercial and private sectors for fields as diverse as urban infrastructure management, farming, and disaster response. Although these opportunities will enhance American economic competitiveness, our Nation must be mindful of the potential implications for privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties. The Federal Government is committed to promoting the responsible use of this technology in a way that does not diminish rights and freedoms.
(a) There is hereby established a multi-stakeholder engagement process to develop and communicate best practices for privacy, accountability, and transparency issues regarding commercial and private UAS use in the NAS. The process will include stakeholders from the private sector.
(b) Within 90 days of the date of this memorandum, the Department of Commerce, through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and in consultation with other interested agencies, will initiate this multi-stakeholder engagement process to develop a framework regarding privacy, accountability, and transparency for commercial and private UAS use. For this process, commercial and private use includes the use of UAS for commercial purposes as civil aircraft, even if the use would qualify a UAS as a public aircraft under 49 U.S.C. 40102(a)(41) and 40125. The process shall not focus on law enforcement or other noncommercial governmental use.
Sec. 3. Definitions. As used in this memorandum:
(a) “Agencies” means executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government that conduct UAS operations in the NAS.
(b) “Federal Government use” means operations in which agencies operate UAS in the NAS. Federal Government use includes agency UAS operations on behalf of another agency or on behalf of a State, local, tribal, or territorial government, or when a nongovernmental entity operates UAS on behalf of an agency.
(c) “National Airspace System” means the common network of U.S. airspace; air navigation facilities, equipment, and services; airports or landing areas; aeronautical charts, information, and services; related rules, regulations, and procedures; technical information; and manpower and material. Included in this definition are system components shared jointly by the Departments of Defense, Transportation, and Homeland Security.
(d) “Unmanned Aircraft System” means an unmanned aircraft (an aircraft that is operated without direct human intervention from within or on the aircraft) and associated elements (including communication links and components that control the unmanned aircraft) that are required for the pilot or system operator in command to operate safely and efficiently in the NAS.
(e) “Personally identifiable information” refers to information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual’s identity, either alone or when combined with other personal or identifying information that is linked or linkable to a specific individual, as set forth in Office of Management and Budget Memorandum M–07–16 (May 22, 2007) and Office of Management and Budget Memorandum M–10–23 (June 25, 2010).
Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) This memorandum complements and is not intended to supersede existing laws and policies for UAS operations in the NAS, including the National Strategy for Aviation Security and its supporting plans, the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) Integration of Civil UAS in the NAS Roadmap, and the FAA’s UAS Comprehensive Plan.
(b) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law, and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(d) Independent agencies are strongly encouraged to comply with this memorandum.
(e) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
(f) The Secretary of Commerce is hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Pilot Program
Memorandum of President of the United States, Oct. 25, 2017, 82 F.R. 50301, provided:
Memorandum for the Secretary of Transportation
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Policy. It shall be the policy of the United States to promote the safe operation of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and enable the development of UAS technologies for use in agriculture, commerce, emergency management, human transportation, and other sectors. Compared to manned aircraft, UAS provide novel, low-cost capabilities for both public and private applications. UAS present opportunities to enhance the safety of the American public, increase the efficiency and productivity of American industry, and create tens of thousands of new American jobs.
The private sector has rapidly advanced UAS capabilities to address the needs of recreational, commercial, and public users. To promote continued technological innovation and to ensure the global leadership of the United States in this emerging industry, the regulatory framework for UAS operations must be sufficiently flexible to keep pace with the advancement of UAS technology, while balancing the vital Federal roles in protecting privacy and civil liberties; mitigating risks to national security and homeland security; and protecting the safety of the American public, critical infrastructure, and the Nation’s airspace. Well-coordinated integration of UAS into the national airspace system (NAS) alongside manned aircraft will increase the safety of the NAS and enable the authorization of more complex UAS operations.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has taken steps to integrate UAS into the NAS at specific test sites and has issued operational requirements for small UAS operations in the NAS. Further integration will require continued private-sector cooperation and the involvement of State, local, and tribal governments in Federal efforts to develop and enforce regulations on UAS operations in their jurisdictions. Input from State, local, tribal, and private-sector stakeholders will be necessary to craft an optimal strategy for the national management of UAS operations. A coordinated effort between the private sector and among these governments will provide certainty and stability to UAS owners and operators, maximize the benefits of UAS technologies for the public, and mitigate risks to public safety and security.
Sec. 2. UAS Integration Pilot Program. (a) Within 90 days of the date of this memorandum, the Secretary of Transportation (Secretary), in consultation with the Administrator of the FAA (Administrator), shall establish a UAS Integration Pilot Program (Program) to test the further integration of UAS into the NAS in a select number of State, local, and tribal jurisdictions.
(b) The objectives of the Program shall be to:
(i) test and evaluate various models of State, local, and tribal government involvement in the development and enforcement of Federal regulations for UAS operations;
(ii) encourage UAS owners and operators to develop and safely test new and innovative UAS concepts of operations; and
(iii) inform the development of future Federal guidelines and regulatory decisions on UAS operations nationwide.
Sec. 3. Implementation. (a) To implement the Program, the Secretary or the Administrator, as appropriate, shall:
(i) solicit proposals from State, local, and tribal governments to test within their jurisdictions the integration of civil and public UAS operations into the NAS below 200 feet above ground level, or up to 400 feet above ground level if the Secretary determines that such an adjustment would be appropriate;
(ii) select proposals by State, local, and tribal governments for participation in the Program according to the criteria listed in subsection (b) of this section;
(iii) enter into agreements with the selected governments to establish the terms of their involvement in UAS operations within their jurisdictions, including their support for Federal enforcement responsibilities; describe the proposed UAS operations to be conducted; and identify the entities that will conduct such operations, including, if applicable, the governments themselves; and
(iv) as necessary, use existing authorities to grant exceptions, exemptions, authorizations, and waivers from FAA regulations to the entities identified in the agreements described in subsection (iii) of this section [sic], including through the issuance of waivers under 14 CFR Part 107 and Certificates of Waiver or Authorization under [former] section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) (Public Law 112–95) [see note above].
(b) In selecting proposals for participation in the Program under subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary shall consider:
(i) overall economic, geographic, and climatic diversity of the selected jurisdictions;
(ii) overall diversity of the proposed models of government involvement;
(iii) overall diversity of the UAS operations to be conducted;
(iv) the location of critical infrastructure;
(v) the involvement of commercial entities in the proposal, and their ability to advance objectives that may serve the public interest as a result of further integration of UAS into the NAS;
(vi) the involvement of affected communities in, and their support for, participating in the Program;
(vii) the commitment of the governments and UAS operators involved in the proposal to comply with requirements related to national defense, homeland security, and public safety, and to address competition, privacy, and civil liberties concerns; and
(viii) the commitment of the governments and UAS operators involved in the proposal to achieve the following policy objectives:
(A) promoting innovation and economic development;
(B) enhancing transportation safety;
(C) enhancing workplace safety;
(D) improving emergency response and search and rescue functions; and
(E) using radio spectrum efficiently and competitively.
(c) Within 180 days of the establishment of the Program, the Secretary shall enter into agreements with State, local, or tribal governments to participate in the Program, with the goal of entering into at least 5 such agreements by that time.
(d) In carrying out subsection (c) of this section, the Secretary shall select State, local, or tribal governments that plan to begin integration of UAS into the NAS in their jurisdictions within 90 days after the date on which the agreement is established.
(e) The Secretary shall consider new proposals for participation in the Program up to 1 year before the Program is scheduled to terminate.
(f) The Secretary shall apply best practices from existing FAA test sites, waivers granted under 14 CFR part 107, exemptions granted under [former] section 333 of the FMRA, the FAA Focus Area Pathfinder Program, and any other relevant programs in order to expedite the consideration of exceptions, exemptions, authorizations, and waivers from FAA regulations to be granted under the Program, as described in subsection (a)(iv) of this section.
(g) The Secretary shall address any non-compliance with the terms of exceptions, exemptions, authorizations, waivers granted, or agreements made with UAS users or participating jurisdictions in a timely and appropriate manner, including by revoking or modifying the relevant terms.
Sec. 4. Coordination. (a) The Administrator, in coordination with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, shall apply relevant information collected during the Program and preliminary findings to inform the development of the UAS Traffic Management System under section 2208 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–190) [set out in a note above].
(b) The Secretary, in coordination with the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security and the Attorney General, shall take necessary and appropriate steps to:
(i) mitigate risks to public safety and homeland and national security when selecting proposals and implementing the Program; and
(ii) monitor compliance with relevant laws and regulations to ensure that Program activities do not interfere with national defense, homeland security, or law enforcement operations and missions.
(c) The heads of executive departments and agencies with relevant law enforcement responsibilities (Federal law enforcement agencies), including the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall develop and implement best practices to enforce the laws and regulations governing UAS operations conducted under the Program.
(d) In carrying out the responsibilities set forth in subsection (c) of this section, the heads of Federal law enforcement agencies shall coordinate with the Secretaries of Defense and Transportation, as well as with the relevant State, local, or tribal law enforcement agencies.
(e) In implementing the Program, the Secretary shall coordinate with the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security and the Attorney General to test counter-UAS capabilities, as well as platform and system-wide cybersecurity, to the extent appropriate and consistent with law.
Sec. 5. Evaluation and Termination of UAS Integration Pilot Program. (a) The Program shall terminate 3 years from the date of this memorandum, unless extended by the Secretary.
(b) Before and after the termination of the Program, the Secretary shall use the information and experience yielded by the Program to inform the development of regulations, initiatives, and plans to enable safer and more complex UAS operations, and shall, as appropriate, share information with the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the heads of other executive departments and agencies.
(c) After the date of this memorandum and until the Program is terminated, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security and the Attorney General, shall submit an annual report to the President setting forth the Secretary’s interim findings and conclusions concerning the Program. Not later than 90 days after the Program is terminated, the Secretary shall submit a final report to the President setting forth the Secretary’s findings and conclusions concerning the Program.
Sec. 6. Definitions. As used in this memorandum, the next stated terms, in singular and plural, are defined as follows:
(a) The term “unmanned aircraft system” has the meaning given that term in section 331 of the FMRA [Pub. L. 112–95, set out in a note above].
(b) The term “public unmanned aircraft system” has the meaning given that term in section 331 of the FMRA.
(c) The term “civil unmanned aircraft system” means an unmanned aircraft system that meets the qualifications and conditions required for operation of a civil aircraft, as defined in 49 U.S.C. 40102.
Sec. 7. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof;
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals; or
(iii) the conduct of public aircraft operations, as defined in 49 U.S.C. 40102(a)(41) and 40125, by executive departments and agencies, consistent with applicable Federal law.
(b) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
(d) The Secretary is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
