(a) Criteria.
This section shall be used to establish soil cleanup levels where the
department has determined that industrial land use represents the reasonable
maximum exposure. Soil cleanup levels for this presumed exposure scenario shall
be established in accordance with this section. To qualify as an industrial
land use and to use an industrial soil cleanup level a site must meet the
following criteria:
(i) The area of the site
where industrial property soil cleanup levels are proposed must meet the
definition of an industrial property under WAC
173-340-200;
Industrial soil cleanup levels are based on an adult worker
exposure scenario. It is essential to evaluate land uses and zoning for
compliance with this definition in the context of this exposure scenario. Local
governments use a variety of zoning categories for industrial land uses so a
property does not necessarily have to be in a zone called "industrial" to meet
the definition of "industrial property." Also, there are land uses allowed in
industrial zones that are actually commercial or residential, rather than
industrial, land uses. Thus, an evaluation to determine compliance with this
definition should include a review of the actual text in the comprehensive plan
and zoning ordinance pertaining to the site and a visit to the site to observe
land uses in the zone. When evaluating land uses to determine if a property use
not specifically listed in the definition is a "traditional industrial use" or
to determine if the property is "zoned for industrial use," the following
characteristics shall be considered:
(A) People do not normally live on industrial
property. The primary potential exposure is to adult employees of businesses
located on the industrial property;
(B) Access to industrial property by the
general public is generally not allowed. If access is allowed, it is highly
limited and controlled due to safety or security considerations;
(C) Food is not normally grown/raised on
industrial property. (However, food processing operations are commonly
considered industrial facilities);
(D) Operations at industrial properties are
often (but not always) characterized by use and storage of chemicals, noise,
odors and truck traffic;
(E) The
surface of the land at industrial properties is often (but not always) mostly
covered by buildings or other structures, paved parking lots, paved access
roads and material storage areas minimizing potential exposure to the soil;
and
(F) Industrial properties may
have support facilities consisting of offices, restaurants, and other
facilities that are commercial in nature but are primarily devoted to
administrative functions necessary for the industrial use and/or are primarily
intended to serve the industrial facility employees and not the general
public.
(ii) The cleanup
action provides for appropriate institutional controls implemented in
accordance with WAC
173-340-440 to limit potential
exposure to residual hazardous substances. This shall include, at a minimum,
placement of a covenant on the property restricting use of the area of the site
where industrial soil cleanup levels are proposed to industrial property uses;
and
(iii) Hazardous substances
remaining at the property after remedial action would not pose a threat to
human health or the environment at the site or in adjacent nonindustrial areas.
In evaluating compliance with this criterion, at a minimum the following
factors shall be considered:
(A) The potential
for access to the industrial property by the general public, especially
children. The proximity of the industrial property to residential areas,
schools or childcare facilities shall be considered when evaluating access. In
addition, the presence of natural features, manmade structures, arterial
streets or intervening land uses that would limit or encourage access to the
industrial property shall be considered. Fencing shall not be considered
sufficient to limit access to an industrial property since this is insufficient
to assure long term protection;
(B)
The degree of reduction of potential exposure to residual hazardous substances
by the selected remedy. Where the residual hazardous substances are to be
capped to reduce exposure, consideration shall be given to the thickness of the
cap and the likelihood of future site maintenance activities, utility and
drainage work, or building construction reexposing residual hazardous
substances;
(C) The potential for
transport of residual hazardous substances to off-property areas, especially
residential areas, schools and childcare facilities;
(D) The potential for significant adverse
effects on wildlife caused by residual hazardous substances using the
procedures in WAC
173-340-7490 through
173-340-7494; and
(E) The likelihood that these factors would
not change for the foreseeable future.
(b)
Expectations. In applying
the criteria in (a) of this subsection, the department expects the following
results:
(i) The department expects that
properties zoned for heavy industrial or high intensity industrial use and
located within a city or county that has completed a comprehensive plan and
adopted implementing zoning regulations under the Growth Management Act
(chapter 36.70A RCW) will meet the definition of industrial property. For
cities and counties not planning under the Growth Management Act, the
department expects that spot zoned industrial properties will not meet the
definition of industrial property but that properties that are part of a larger
area zoned for heavy industrial or high intensity industrial use will meet the
definition of an industrial property;
(ii) For both GMA and non-GMA cities and
counties, the department expects that light industrial and commercial zones and
uses should meet the definition of industrial property where the land uses are
comparable to those cited in the definition of industrial property or the land
uses are an integral part of a qualifying industrial use (such as, ancillary or
support facilities). This will require a site-by-site evaluation of the zoning
text and land uses;
(iii) The
department expects that for portions of industrial properties in close
proximity to (generally, within a few hundred feet) residential areas, schools
or childcare facilities, residential soil cleanup levels will be used unless:
(A) Access to the industrial property is very
unlikely or, the hazardous substances that are not treated or removed are
contained under a cap of clean soil (or other materials) of substantial
thickness so that it is very unlikely the hazardous substances would be
disturbed by future site maintenance and construction activities (depths of
even shallow footings, utilities and drainage structures in industrial areas
are typically three to six feet); and
(B) The hazardous substances are relatively
immobile (or have other characteristics) or have been otherwise contained so
that subsurface lateral migration or surficial transport via dust or runoff to
these nearby areas or facilities is highly unlikely; and
(iv) Note that a change in the reasonable
maximum exposure to industrial site use primarily affects the direct contact
exposure pathway. Thus, for example, for sites where the soil cleanup level is
based primarily on the potential for the hazardous substance to leach and cause
groundwater contamination, it is the department's expectation that an
industrial land use will not affect the soil cleanup level. Similarly, where
the soil cleanup level is based primarily on surface water protection or other
pathways other than direct human contact, land use is not expected to affect
the soil cleanup level.